Radiation levels on Bikini Atoll found to exceed safety standard

June 7, 2016 by Bob Yirka, Phys.org report

Bikini Island, 2015. Credit: Emlyn Hughes
(Phys.org)—A team of researchers from Columbia University in New York has found that all of the Marshall Islands involved in nuclear tests by the U.S. are now habitable, except for Bikini Atoll. In their paper published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the team describes the reasoning for their testing, the methods they used, their results and what they believe should be done going forward.

As most everyone knows, the United States embarked on an ambitious nuclear arms program beginning during the closing days of World War II. Testing was done at various sites, one of which involved the northern Marshall Islands. In all the U.S. detonated 67 nuclear devices in the area between the years 1946 to 1958. To make the site ready for testing, inhabitants of the were moved to other islands—but now, as time has passed, those people and their descendants, wish to return. But before that can happen, the impacted islands must be deemed safe. But, the researchers with this new effort contend, the government of the Marshall Islands has been relying on outdated information. No on the ground survey of gamma radiation has been conducted over the past several decades.

To remedy that situation, the team flew to the Marshal Islands and conducted surveys on three of the atolls most impacted by the , and compared their readings with an island (Majuro Atoll) distant enough from the blast zone to be used as a control, it showed 13 millirems of radiation per year. For further illustration purposes, the team also took readings in New York's Central Park, which showed 9 mrem/y.

The researchers report that they found readings on Enewetak Atoll to be 7.6 mrem/y, and on Rongelap to be 19.8 mrem/y, both of which fall in the safe zone. Readings on Bikini Atoll, on the other hand were 184 mrem/y, which is not considered terribly dangerous, but it does exceed the minimum acceptable levels agreed upon by the U.S. and the government of Marshall Islands—also the researchers point out, more study needs to be done on Bikini Atoll to ascertain what sorts of exposure people living on the island might be exposed to, e.g. through the food they eat, before any talk of re-habitation can begin.

Explore further: Rising seas swamp Marshall Islands

More information: Autumn S. Bordner et al. Measurement of background gamma radiation in the northern Marshall Islands, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2016). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1605535113

Abstract
We report measurements of background gamma radiation levels on six islands in the northern Marshall Islands (Enewetak, Medren, and Runit onEnewetak Atoll; Bikini and Nam on Bikini Atoll; and Rongelap on Rongelap Atoll). Measurable excess radiation could be expected from the decay of 137Cs produced by the US nuclear testing program there from 1946 to 1958. These recordings are of relevance to safety of human habitation and resettlement. We find low levels of gamma radiation for the settled island of Enewetak [mean = 7.6 millirem/year (mrem/y) = 0.076 millisievert/year (mSv/y)], larger levels of gamma radiation for the island of Rongelap (mean = 19.8 mrem/y = 0.198 mSv/y), and relatively high gamma radiation on the island of Bikini (mean = 184 mrem/y = 1.84 mSv/y). Distributions of gamma radiation levels are provided, and hot spots are discussed. We provide interpolated maps for four islands (Enewetak, Medren, Bikini, and Rongelap), and make comparisons to control measurements performed on the island of Majuro in the southern Marshall Islands, measurements made in Central Park in New York City, and the standard agreed upon by the United States and the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) governments (100 mrem/y = 1 mSv/y). External gamma radiation levels on Bikini Island significantly exceed this standard (P = <<0.01), and external gamma radiation levels on the other islands are below the standard. To determine conclusively whether these islands are safe for habitation, radiation exposure through additional pathways such as food ingestion must be considered.

Related Stories

Rising seas swamp Marshall Islands

March 11, 2016

Residents in low-lying areas of the Marshall Islands were braced for ongoing flooding Friday, as a series of high tides underscores the Pacific island nation's vulnerability to climate change.

LLNL research at Marshall Islands could lead to resettlement

February 11, 2010

Through Laboratory soil cleanup methods, residents of Bikini, Enjebi and Rongelap Islands - where nuclear tests were conducted on the atolls and in the ocean surrounding them in the 1950s - could have lower radioactive levels ...

Recommended for you

Galactic center visualization delivers star power

March 21, 2019

Want to take a trip to the center of the Milky Way? Check out a new immersive, ultra-high-definition visualization. This 360-movie offers an unparalleled opportunity to look around the center of the galaxy, from the vantage ...

Ultra-sharp images make old stars look absolutely marvelous

March 21, 2019

Using high-resolution adaptive optics imaging from the Gemini Observatory, astronomers have uncovered one of the oldest star clusters in the Milky Way Galaxy. The remarkably sharp image looks back into the early history of ...

5 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Priness
2 / 5 (8) Jun 07, 2016
Now that radiation levels have been deemed safe on all islands except Bikini Atoll, will displaced Marshallese and their descendants be required to return to the Marshall islands or will the US government at least cut off their benefits? There are many Marshallese living in the US and (evidently) according to the treaty, Marshallese are being supported by the government into perpetuity including housing, health care, cash benefits, food, transportation, the whole bit. We have supported the population of Marshall islands for 60 years. Should the hard working taxpayers of the US have to support them forever?
Eikka
4.3 / 5 (3) Jun 07, 2016
which is not considered terribly dangerous, but it does exceed the minimum acceptable levels agreed upon by the U.S. and the government of Marshall Islands

relatively high gamma radiation on the island of Bikini (mean = 184 mrem/y = 1.84 mSv/y)


https://en.wikipe...adiation

The average person in the US gets about 3 mSv per year from exposure to radon coming off of the ground, cosmic radiation, rocks and ground, and eating bananas. Another 3 mSv comes from medical x-rays and occupational sources.

An additional 2 mSv per year is basically within normal variation that ordinary people face every day, but rules are rules and contracts must be obeyed.
Mark Thomas
3.7 / 5 (3) Jun 08, 2016
Someday when we reach Callisto, the radiation levels there (roughly about 36 mSv/year) probably won't seem too bad. On the other hand, visits to Ganymede, Europa and Io are going to require increasingly stringent measures to keep us protected. Ganymede is the least irradiated of those three and still receives about 80 mSv per DAY.
Chinamike
5 / 5 (7) Jun 09, 2016
To Priness (I assume it was supposed to be "Princess")
Yes, we should be willing to support them "forever" as you stated, because we set off nearly 70 nukes in their backyard. Many of the bombs were blown up mid-air, meaning that a huge amount of radio active fallout covered all the Island areas for hundreds of miles around. This seeped into the top soil and has thus polluted them indefinitely. Note that they are only doing "readings" of surface areas. They did not however, penetrate the ground and take samples to see if the soil is suitable for planting crops. Also, they did not drill for fresh water samples, as many of the Islands have aquifers.
I live in Hawaii, and there are MANY Marshallese people here. I have absolutely NO PROBLEM letting them live off the USA, because of what our military did to their lands.
I am 55 and I have worked since I was 16, paying into the system. If my son and his children still have to carry the burden of these fine Island people, so be it.
Solon
5 / 5 (1) Jun 12, 2016
With global warming and rising sea levels I don't think there is much future for the islands anyway, let's nuke 'em again!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.