Just 40 light years from Earth, three planets might host life forms adapted to infrared worlds

Three potentially habitable worlds found around nearby ultracool dwarf star
This artist's impression shows an imagined view from the surface one of the three planets orbiting an ultracool dwarf star just 40 light-years from Earth that were discovered using the TRAPPIST telescope at ESO's La Silla Observatory. These worlds have sizes and temperatures similar to those of Venus and Earth and are the best targets found so far for the search for life outside the solar system. They are the first planets ever discovered around such a tiny and dim star.

In this view one of the inner planets is seen in transit across the disc of its tiny and dim parent star. Credit: ESO/M. Kornmesser

Is there life beyond our solar system? If there is, our best bet for finding it may lie in three nearby, Earth-like exoplanets.

For the first time, an international team of astronomers from MIT, the University of Liège in Belgium, and elsewhere have detected three orbiting an ultracool dwarf star, just 40 light years from Earth. The sizes and temperatures of these worlds are comparable to those of Earth and Venus, and are the best targets found so far for the search for life outside the solar system. The results are published today in the journal Nature.

The scientists discovered the planets using TRAPPIST (TRAnsiting Planets and PlanetesImals Small Telescope), a 60-centimeter telescope operated by the University of Liège, based in Chile. TRAPPIST is designed to focus on 60 nearby dwarf stars—very small, cool stars that are so faint they are invisible to optical telescopes. Belgian scientists designed TRAPPIST to monitor dwarf stars at infrared wavelengths and search for planets around them.

The team focused the telescope on the ultracool dwarf star, 2MASS J23062928-0502285, now known as TRAPPIST-1, a Jupiter-sized star that is one-eighth the size of our sun and significantly cooler. Over several months starting in September 2015, the scientists observed the star's infrared signal fade slightly at regular intervals, suggesting that several objects were passing in front of the star.

With further observations, the team confirmed the objects were indeed planets, with similar sizes to Earth and Venus. The two innermost planets orbit the star in 1.5 and 2.4 days, though they receive only four and two times the amount of radiation, respectively, as the Earth receives from the sun. The third planet may orbit the star in anywhere from four to 73 days, and may receive even less radiation than Earth. Given their size and proximity to their ultracool star, all three planets may have regions with temperatures well below 400 kelvins, within a range that is suitable for sustaining liquid water and life.

Because the system is just 40 light years from Earth, co-author Julien de Wit, a postdoc in the Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, says scientists will soon be able to study the planets' atmospheric compositions, as well as assess their habitability and whether life actually exists within this planetary system.

"These planets are so close, and their star so small, we can study their atmosphere and composition, and further down the road, which is within our generation, assess if they are actually inhabited," de Wit says. "All of these things are achievable, and within reach now. This is a jackpot for the field."

A risk, paid off

For the most part, today's exoplanetary missions have been focused on finding systems around bright, solar-like stars. These stars emit radiation in the visible band—most often at yellow wavelengths—and can be seen with . However, because these stars are so bright, their light can overpower any signal coming from a planet.

Cold dwarf stars, in contrast, are faint stars that emit radiation in the infrared band. Because they are so faint, these tiny red stars would not drown out a planetary signal, giving scientists a better chance of detecting orbiting planets. However, most missions today are not optimized to observe such stars.

"That means they can't detect planets around such stars," de Wit points out. "So you have to design a completely different survey using special instruments and detectors—it's a risk."

Lead authors Michael Gillon and Emmanuel Jehin, of the University of Liège, took that risk and built TRAPPIST, the proof-of-concept telescope that looks at 60 small, nearby ultracool stars.

"It's not looking at 100,000 at a time, like the Kepler Space Telescope," de Wit says. "It's a few of them that you're spending time on, one at a time. And one paid off."

"Worlds shifted in wavelength"

From their observations, the scientists determined that all three planets are likely tidally locked, with permanent day and night sides. The two planets closest to the star may have day sides that are too hot, and night sides too cold, to host any life forms. However, there may be a "sweet spot" on the western side of both planets—a region that still receives daylight, but with relatively cool temperatures—that may be temperate enough to sustain conditions suitable for life. The third planet, furthest from its star, may be entirely within the habitable zone.

As for next steps, de Wit says the objective is clear.

"Now we have to investigate if they're habitable," de Wit says. "We will investigate what kind of atmosphere they have, and then will search for biomarkers and signs of life. We have facilities all over the globe and in space that are helping us, working from UV to radio, in all different wavelengths to tell us everything we want to know about this system. So many people will get to play with this [system]."


Explore further

Newly discovered planet in the Hyades cluster could shed light on planetary evolution

More information: Michaël Gillon et al, Temperate Earth-sized planets transiting a nearby ultracool dwarf star, Nature (2016). DOI: 10.1038/nature17448
Journal information: Nature

Citation: Just 40 light years from Earth, three planets might host life forms adapted to infrared worlds (2016, May 2) retrieved 21 August 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2016-05-years-earth-planets-host-life.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
3559 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

May 02, 2016
Photosynthesis would be a problem without the high-energy photons from the blue part of the spectrum.

May 02, 2016
@ glam-Skippy, I hate to be being mean and nasty to you. But I got to ask, did you even get past the title on this one?

Photosynthesis would be a problem without the high-energy photons from the blue part of the spectrum.


In case you missed it,,,, """""""Just 40 light years from Earth, three planets might host life forms, ADAPTED TO INFRARED WORLDS""""""""

ADAPTED TO INFRARED WORLDS.
ADAPTED TO INFRARED WORLDS.
ADAPTED TO INFRARED WORLDS.

I wonder what that might mean? To a normal person it means ADAPTED TO INFRARED WORLDS.

May 02, 2016
@BartV
You, being a believer in the Creator, AFAIK, should stop trying to guess at what else He has done in the past and present...and will do in the future. Man was created separately and apart from animals and plants, according to Genesis, which was why fruit trees had evolved before the first man was created, and the fruit were available to be eaten.
That being said, do you honestly believe that the Creator had nothing better to do in His Universe that he had made, except to tend to the needs and wants of humans?
God creates, and has created many other life forms, some intelligent, and others had to evolve or grow their intelligence. Still others were allowed to evolve, but through bad circumstances, were not as lucky.
The ones who were lucky and put their brains to good use are living, not just existing, on other worlds. Our species may never see them, and maybe they would prefer not to meet us. Reading the news, I wouldn't blame them. Although some are here already with us

May 02, 2016
@gkam
Before I forget, here is something for you to chew on.

https://www.rt.co...nsation/

I KNOW that you hate nuclear energy, so that is something else to think about, and it's right there in your state.

May 02, 2016
We should stop wasting time, money, and resources searching for extraterrestrial life. It is completely futile. Incredible Life doesn't happen by time and chance.

This same asinine logic could be applied to any question that is currently not understood. The real reason you don't want to search for life is because we might actually find it. And that would throw your childish ideas about a creator into turmoil.

Don't worry, I'm sure you'll find some ridiculous excuse for why your creator could have sprinkled the whole universe with life, or something.

May 02, 2016
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the title is a bit off and makes it appear that it is the 3 planets that are infrared, and that any life forms must be "adapted to infrared worlds". The alternative is that the star is emitting infrared ONTO the 3 planets, but the 3 planets are not themselves infrared, which wouldn't make sense.
The text clearly says, "...starting in September 2015, the scientists observed the star's infrared signal fade slightly at regular intervals, suggesting that several objects were passing in front of the star."
It looks to me that it's the STAR that is giving off the infrared signal. Anyone agree with that?

May 03, 2016

Time it would take to get there:

Current rocket technology: 365,000-400,000 years.
1957's Project Orion ship: 195-240 years.

Think about it.

yep
May 03, 2016
Photosynthesis would be a problem without the high-energy photons from the blue part of the spectrum.

The literature seems to indicate plants will grow with the absence of either. And the optimum ratio is 5 parts red to 1 part blue. Red being the major factor in growth, flowering , seeding and fruiting.
As far as infared goes, mushrooms do not need visible light to grow, can withstand interstellar space, and potentially break down rocky planets making life possible for beings like BartV who are unable to comprehend we are genetically related. It's tought to get a skin ape to understand it's really a meat mushroom!

May 03, 2016
I wondered the same thing, about photosynthesis on a world where the peak wavelength is about 1000 nm.

Of course, life doesn't really require photosynthetic autotrophs: it could be chemical heterotrophs, like life at deep sea vents and in the crust on our planet.

A little more research revealed that there is a bacterial photosynthesis system that operates between 870 nm and 960 nm, quite solidly in the infrared.

May 03, 2016
Who cares if the universe was CREATED or simply HAPPENED by chance! The fact is that we have a REAL chance here, to find out more about life, nature, other worlds! Please stop these childish comments about God / no God ...
I for one hope that we can develop the tech to find out more in my life time. Maybe even visit (even by drones etc) these worlds! We have the brain capacity to learn, create! Given to us by nature, God? Who cares! The point is, we DO have the curiosity, the NEED to understand, to know more! Let's use it then!!!!

May 03, 2016
BartV claims
.. stop wasting time, money, and resources searching for extraterrestrial life
Really ? Deprive those developing; advanced more sensitive instruments, associative analysis tools, data-analytics software, information management, demonstration & Science education for rednecks ?

So all those with passion for astrobiology should be deprived expanding horizons, shouldn't search for details beneath mere dogmatic claim "nothing out there", when spectra show presence of amino acids in space, ie building blocks of life here & more ?

BartV claims
It is completely futile
Why, please articulate *any* reasoning ?

BartV claims
Incredible Life doesn't happen by time and chance
Certainly doesnt in your case, ie your education futility in Probability math :/

Appreciate "genetic algorithms", simple & Very powerful:- Arena, Discontinuous things, time & energy"

Complexity automatically arises from simplicity, Eg Amino-Acids such as Guanine etc etc etc

May 03, 2016
Mike-Skippy who can not make a three word sentence blurts,,,
Really ? Deprive those developing; advanced more sensitive instruments, associative analysis tools, data-analytics software, information management, demonstration & Science education for rednecks ?


Sounds more like science education for peoples who are manics or on drugs.

So all those with passion for astrobiology should be deprived expanding horizons, shouldn't search for details beneath mere dogmatic claim "nothing out there", when spectra show presence of amino acids in space, ie building blocks of life here & more ?
Cher, I am sure you think that if you garble up your words and thoughts, it will make you feel smart when nobody can answer. But they can not answer what the can't understand and it makes you look like you got the mental condition.

please articulate *any* reasoning ?
Coming from you, is that the joke?

May 03, 2016
Somebody tell Ira about Einstein's first Nobel Prize.

May 03, 2016
Now, that's some place to visit with drones. We should create a good lot of them, there's some work to do and there will be more!

May 03, 2016
Somebody tell Ira about Einstein's first Nobel Prize.
I know about Einstein's first Nobel Prize Skippy. It was for the photo-electric effect. But why you think he had a "first" Nobel Prize. He had ONLY one Nobel Prize. There was not a "second" one for him. Trying to sound smart you doubled down on stupid again.

May 03, 2016
"looked it up", did you? Was it his first one?

Find my cars yet?

May 03, 2016
"looked it up", did you? Was it his first one?
Didn't need to on this one. I already knew it because I have read lots of books about scientists doing their science stuffs.

Find my cars yet?
You mean the electric car you don't have? Yeah, I find that one. It is right there in your "if I lie about my electric car, it don't count as a lie because I am glam-Skippy, and my lies don't count because I really would have one if I could, so even though I don't have on, it does not count as a lie".

Now, I know you are going to skip right on over this, and pretend it is not there and hope nobody notices. But if you got all this time to fool around with me, will you take the time to tell us about the "capacitive sensors" you told us about that detect when you are about to bump into somebody? How do they detect the Skippy or the dog you are about to bump into?

May 03, 2016
Well, gosh, you said that about my work at the Air Force Flight Test Center, didn't you? Then, whether I really helped put together and deploy and operate the Electronic Battlefield in Vietnam?

Let's see, you screamed I did not really do the studies and reports for NASA and the DCPA, did not really earn a Master of Science, and teach Power Quality nationwide to senior utility engineers. Until I proved all of it, and more. You have yet to get to the good parts. I am saving them for later.

Maybe I will put the story in the Gulf Coast News, so all can see how their "Ira" got taken advantage of for his emotional and abusive temperament.


May 03, 2016
Well, gosh, you said that about my work at the Air Force Flight Test Center, didn't you? Then, whether I really helped put together and deploy and operate the Electronic Battlefield in Vietnam?

Let's see, you screamed I did not really do the studies and reports for NASA and the DCPA, did not really earn a Master of Science, and teach Power Quality nationwide to senior utility engineers. Until I proved all of it, and more. You have yet to get to the good parts. I am saving them for later.

Maybe I will put the story in the Gulf Coast News, so all can see how their "Ira" got taken advantage of for his emotional and abusive temperament.


Does this mean you are not going to tell us about the "capacitive sensors" in "your" electric car you said was there to warn you when you were about to bump into somebody? Tell the trut, that was just one more thing you make up out of thin air to sound like might know something, eh?

May 03, 2016
No, it means the Guardian article about the internet making you dumber is accurate.

Experience is where it is at, Toots.

May 03, 2016
No, it means the Guardian article about the internet making you dumber is accurate.

Experience is where it is at, Toots.


Well you were so proud of the "capacitive sensors" on "your" new electric car, you even crowed about them in three different postums. Now you want to be all shy about them, so it sort of looks like you might being lying again. But we know that glam-Skippy would not lie because he is "real" Maybe you should use that interweb for looking up stuffs instead of a place to make foolish comments that make it look like you are lying all the time.

If my car had "capacitive sensors" that would tell me I was about to bump into somebody, I would not be ashamed to tell peoples about him. Is it some of that secret technology that only glam-Skippy knows about from "experiences"?

May 03, 2016
This is very good news! And an awesome name for a telescope!

- It clears a large class of stars as having normal systems. I think there has been reports of (gas giant) planets around brown dwarfs, but this is stronger evidence of terrestrials in the class.

- All 3 of the planets clears the putative more stringent condition to be less than 1.2 Earth radii in order to be terrestrial. (Though the paper itself uses another condition of surface equilibrium temperatures to tentatively clear them.) [ http://www.planet...ets.html ; I am a huge fan of first principles, so this putatively unbiased way of classifying planets looks intriguing.]

This could up the current Earth like set from 3 (using the stringent criteria and including Earth) to 6. (See the paper's table of possible equilibrium surface temperatures.)

[tbctd]

May 03, 2016
[ctd]

- I don't know about the oxygenating photosynthesis potential around these extremely low mass red dwarfs on the border of brown dwarfs. But the paper's surface temperature of ~ 2 500 K should mean at least a few percent of the stars light would fall in the >~ 3 000 K (IIRC) window where near-IR capable chlorophylls work.

C.f. how some green bacteria can do non-oxygenic photosynthesis - using parts of the same system -around ocean vents glowing at ~ 700 K. The blue end of the spectra is used to make photosynthesis more efficient, that is why the pigment reflects green photons, it isn't necessary IIRC. (But I have to check it. I know M dwarfs that radiate above 3000 K is OK.)

As already noted, just to get energy out of the starlight, archaea has a simpler rhodopsin - based system. (The same pigment type we eukaryote descendants use in a large number of independently evolved eyes.)

May 03, 2016
I wouldn't care about the creationist crackpot trolls and their apologist accommodationists. They both fail to accept the observations that life emerged out of a natural process - early Earth was sterile, then it was not - or that the two top theories today does mot rely on time and chance.

All it takes the process is 10 - 100 kyrs, and one of a huge number of alkaline vents (vent theory), or a not entirely unlikely series of tidal pools (soup theory).

Earth was habitable > 4.3 Ga, the earliest dated split is > 4,2 Ga, and the earliest putative fossil confirms that split had happened > 4,1 Ga (because the carbon isotope ratios are the one photosynthetic bacteria make).

That means life had > 100 Myrs to evolve archaea & bacteria, which is the same period of time it took to evolve modern mammals (mostly after the K/Pg event 65 Myrs ago), or land tetrapods (after the first fishes appeared 530 Myrs ago and the first land tetrapods 400 Myrs ago).

May 03, 2016
Also, I noted the incredibly stupid and erroneous claim that humans evolved differently than other lineages and followed an invented, mostly erroneous myth.

(I say "mostly" to be kind, because there are stuff that can't be tested yet. That which has been tested, around 50 %, is found *all wrong*. So much for magical fantasies about invisible bearded magical agents, which just happen to be the right one among 35 000 variants among similar christianist sects or all the other similar magic beliefs. Improbable, if we didn't already know utterly inane and utterly wrong.)

Here is the evolution of all the human species to date, some 7 - 15 depending on how you define fossil species: https://en.wikipe...iki/Homo . Why would one of them be special, why would any species be special when it is so unlikely among 100s of millions of species? Astoundingly inane, erroneous and full of immoral hubris. (These people will all go to their fantasy 'Hell', I take it.)

May 03, 2016
OK, it is as I remember: the oxygen producing PII complex uses very red, 680 nm, photons. It is the antenna complex that tries to extract as many useful photons it can, mostly in the visible range due to UV absorption in the atmosphere et cetera, and deliver them as ~ 680 nm photons to PII. [ https://en.wikipe...system_II]https://en.wikipe...ystem_II[/url] ; https://en.wikipe...iki/P680 ; https://en.wikipe...n_plants ] The P! center uses even redder photons, max absorption @ 700 nm. [ https://en.wikipe...system_I ]

I haven't integrated it, but eyeballing gives that indeed a few % of photons are more energetic than 680 nm @ 2500 K blackbody. [ http://www.giangr...dy.shtml ] Plants could evolve on habitable planets around this star.

May 04, 2016
Who cares if the universe was CREATED or simply HAPPENED by chance! The fact is that we have a REAL chance here, to find out more about life, nature, other worlds! Please stop these childish comments about God / no God ...
I for one hope that we can develop the tech to find out more in my life time. Maybe even visit (even by drones etc) these worlds! We have the brain capacity to learn, create! Given to us by nature, God? Who cares! The point is, we DO have the curiosity, the NEED to understand, to know more! Let's use it then!!!!
- langbaba

That is the whole point of having a "mind" and the capacity to use it, as well as the ability of mobility...ALL geared to enable and equip the mind for the purpose of discovery and to assimilate data while considering all of the implications of such. It is as it had been foreseen.

May 07, 2016
I read somewhere that red dwarf stars are pretty turbulent and since the habitable zone with such stars would have to be much closer to the red dwarf than for our sun, planets in those systems would be blasted with a relatively stronger solar wind, flares and coronal ejections. Also since many red dwarf stars are much older than our system, any rocky planet in those systems would most likely have lost their magnetic shielding leaving them totally exposed.

If all that is true, is searching for habitable planets around red dwarf systems a waste of time and resources?

May 07, 2016
Re photosynthesis around lukewarm stars, it hit me that the difference between bacteria that can't oxidize water to oxygen (say, green sulfur bacteria) and those who ca,looks like a duplication of the photosynthetic complexes in the Z scheme that gradually increases the energies of the freed electrons until they can reduce hydrogen. [ https://en.wikipe...ynthesis ] It would be less likely, but consequential, if organisms under red dwarfs would similarly increase the length of the electron transport chain until they can oxidize what they find available. I.e. 3 or even 4 steps would be possible until water "cracks", by way of other stuff that can be oxidized at first.

May 07, 2016
tblakely: Red dwarfs in general have a long (1 Gyrs) violent youth, but not all. For reasons unknown, ~ 10 % are calmer, not unlike our own somewhat calmer than average star. Since planets, especially these a bit larger than Earth ones, can start off with dense atmospheres (like Earth, that is believed to originally had ~ 10 bars of CO2), they may be "just right" when these stars mature. I.e. it is pretty much a zero sum game.

It is believed that planets a bit larger than Earth would have a bit stronger geodynamo.

So no, it isn't apriori wasted time, and anyway we need to study some of these planets before we really know either way,

May 07, 2016
The information is non material fundamental entity and can not emerge spontaniously from the matter or energy. The matter and energy can only be used to store or transfer the existing information.
The information is product of mental process and is consequience of intensional choice of inteligent being. It can be shared between its source and the recipients only by pre established set of rules for its coding and decoding to be pasible it right understanding or interpretation.
So it does not exist any chance for evolutionary processes without the direct intervention of intelligent being according to his ideas, will and moral principles and based on his knowedge and technological capabilities.


May 08, 2016
"The information".

What "information"? We do observe these planets, and we do observe evolution, so we have information about both, and that was the topic - evolution on planets - what was discussed.

I swear, the quality of trolls have gone down here. They used to make sense if you squinted hard, now they can't even order a pizza down to the cellar where they hide from their mother's eyes.

May 08, 2016
"It is believed that planets a bit larger than Earth would have a bit stronger geodynamo."

Doesn't Earth have an unusually large iron core for it's size due to assimilating the core from Theia? If so, wouldn't that mean a 'normal' rocky planet would have to be significantly larger than Earth to have an even larger core and thus a much longer lasting magnetic shield?

May 09, 2016
according to Genesis


With or without Phil Collins

May 09, 2016
[It is as it had been foreseen.


By You? You are a Genius!

May 09, 2016
Fascinating, and likely indicative that there are going to be quite a few places other than Earth capable of supporting life. These guys may have gotten lucky on their first roll of the dice, but that seems unlikely.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more