Proton-conducting material found in electrosensory organs of sharks

Proton-conducting material found in electrosensory organs of sharks
Pressing along the canals on the ventral side of an adult skate causes AoL jelly to extrude from the pores of the ampullae of Lorenzini. Credit: Erik Josberger

Sharks, skates, and rays can detect very weak electric fields produced by prey and other animals using an array of unusual organs known as the ampullae of Lorenzini. Exactly how these electrosensory organs work has remained a mystery, but a new study has revealed an important clue that may have implications for other fields of research.

First described by Stefano Lorenzini in 1678, the ampullae of Lorenzini are visible as small pores in the skin around the head and on the underside of sharks, skates, and rays (known as elasmobranchs, a subclass of cartilaginous fish). Each pore is open to the environment and is connected to a set of electrosensory cells by a long canal filled with a clear, viscous jelly.

In the new study, published May 13 in Science Advances, a team of researchers from UC Santa Cruz, University of Washington, and the Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason investigated the properties of this jelly. They found that the jelly is a remarkable proton-conducting material, with the highest proton conductivity ever reported for a biological material. Its conductivity is only 40 times lower than the current state-of-the-art proton-conducting polymer (Nafion), said corresponding author Marco Rolandi, associate professor of at UC Santa Cruz.

"The observation of high proton conductivity in the jelly is very exciting," Rolandi said. "We hope that our findings may contribute to future studies of the electrosensing function of the ampullae of Lorenzini and of the organ overall, which is itself rather exceptional."

Proton-conducting material found in electrosensory organs of sharks
(A and B) Skates and sharks locate their prey by detecting the weak electric fields naturally generated by biomechanical activity. (C) A network of electrosensory organs called the ampullae of Lorenzini is responsible for this sense. (D) An individual ampulla consists of a surface pore connected to a set of electrosensory cells by a long jelly-filled canal. Sharks and skate can sense fields as small as 5 nV/cm despite canals traveling through up to 25 cm of noisy biological tissue. Credit: Luk Cox

The integration of signals from several ampullae allows , skates, and rays to detect changes in the electric field as small as 5 nanovolts per centimeter. But how such weak signals are transmitted from the pore to the sensory cells has long been a matter of debate. The researchers speculate that sulfated polyglycans in the jelly may contribute to its high proton conductivity.

Proton conductivity is the ability of a material or solution to conduct protons (positive hydrogen ions). In a system with very many ordered hydrogen bonds, such as a hydrated hydrophilic polymer, proton conduction can occur along chains of these bonds, Rolandi explained. In technological applications, proton conductors such as Nafion can be used as proton exchange membranes in fuel cells.

"The first time I measured the proton conductivity of the jelly, I was really surprised," said first author Erik Josberger, an electrical engineering doctoral student in Rolandi's group at UW. "The conductivity was only 40 times smaller than Nafion."

The new findings may be of interest to researchers in materials science and other fields. Applications of the discovery could include unconventional sensor technology, Rolandi said.


Explore further

Tiny tubes move into the fast lane

More information: "Proton conductivity in ampullae of Lorenzini jelly," Science Advances, advances.sciencemag.org/content/2/5/e1600112
Journal information: Science Advances

Citation: Proton-conducting material found in electrosensory organs of sharks (2016, May 13) retrieved 20 September 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2016-05-proton-conducting-material-electrosensory-sharks.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
1551 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

May 14, 2016
photomultiplier? Proton multiplier. The investigators have it totally wrong. It's a multiplier effect, not conduction. It's very similar to pheromone transduction, see Nicholson, B. Pheromones cause disease: pheromone odorant transduction. 2001.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more