Google wins in retrial of Oracle copyright lawsuit

May 27, 2016 by Glenn Chapman
Oracle sought billions in damages from Google over the search engine company's use of Java programming language in its Android smartphone operating system

A jury ruled Thursday that Google did not unfairly use parts of Java programming language, saving the tech giant from a possible multibillion-dollar verdict in a lawsuit brought by business software firm Oracle.

The retrial stemmed from a 2012 case in which Google also prevailed, and has been closely watched by the tech industry because of its implications for software innovation and copyright law.

Oracle sought billions in damages from Google over the search engine company's use of Java programming language in its Android smartphone operating system.

But Google and its allies argued that extending copyright protection to bits of code, called application programming interfaces, or APIs, would threaten innovation.

Google said in a statement that the verdict "represents a win for the Android ecosystem, for the Java programming community and for software developers who rely on open and free programming languages to build innovative consumer products."

Oracle, which obtained Java when it acquired Sun Microsystems in 2009, had been seeking some $9 billion in damages.

After Google prevailed in the first trial, Oracle appealed, and an appellate panel ruled in 2014 that the lower court had erred, sending the case between the two Silicon Valley titans back for a new trial.

Oracle, which obtained Java when it acquired Sun Microsystems in 2009, had been seeking some $9 billion in damages from Google

Oracle said Thursday its battle was not over.

"We strongly believe that Google developed Android by illegally copying core Java technology to rush into the mobile device market," Oracle general counsel Dorian Daley said in an email.

"Oracle brought this lawsuit to put a stop to Google's illegal behavior," he added.

"We believe there are numerous grounds for appeal and we plan to bring this case back to the Federal Circuit on appeal."

Silicon Valley victory

Public interest and industry groups hailed the verdict as a win for the software makers and technology innovators.

Silicon Valley had been watching the case closely, since weaving open source code into software programs is commonplace and often eliminates a need to re-invent commands considered fundamental.

Google and its allies argued that extending copyright protection to bits of code, called application programming interfaces, or APIs, would threaten innovation

APIs are seen as snippets of code that simply direct one program to another, almost the way a restaurant menu points diners to meal options.

"While the legal process may still be ongoing, this is an important win for software developers everywhere and it promotes innovation," Computer and Communications Industry Association chief executive Ed Black said.

"APIs are important building blocks for all software. Allowing copyright claims to block their use by third parties would have a chilling effect across the entire software industry."

The CCIA describes itself as an international, nonprofit group representing a cross-section of the computer, communications and Internet industries.

"Software developers always have been, and should continue to be, free to develop new products that are compatible with other pieces of software," said John Bergmayer, senior staff attorney at public interest group Public Knowledge.

"It's been the norm in the software industry for decades. The jury's verdict is a welcome dose of common sense."

Explore further: Appeal court revives Oracle-Google copyright battle (Update)

Related Stories

Justices won't hear Google appeal in dispute with Oracle

June 29, 2015

The Supreme Court is staying out of a long-running legal battle between technology giants Oracle and Google over copyright protection for a computer program that powers most of the world's smartphones and computer tablets.

Google violated copyright, but no damages: jury

May 7, 2012

A jury ruled Monday that Google violated copyrights owned by Oracle Corp. for the Android mobile platform, but failed to agree on whether damages should be awarded in the high-profile trial.

Recommended for you

Semimetals are high conductors

March 18, 2019

Researchers in China and at UC Davis have measured high conductivity in very thin layers of niobium arsenide, a type of material called a Weyl semimetal. The material has about three times the conductivity of copper at room ...

Researchers discover new material to help power electronics

March 18, 2019

Electronics rule our world, but electrons rule our electronics. A research team at The Ohio State University has discovered a way to simplify how electronic devices use those electrons—using a material that can serve dual ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.