EU delays re-approval for weedkiller glyphosate

Campaigners demonstrate in Brussels on May 18, 2016 against the use of weedkiller glyphosate
Campaigners demonstrate in Brussels on May 18, 2016 against the use of weedkiller glyphosate

The EU on Thursday failed to agree on the re-approval of weedkiller glyphosate in Europe amid fresh fears the product could cause cancer.

This is the second time that regulators from the 28 EU members states, in addition to the European Commission, delayed their decision on rolling over the approval for glyphosate amid fierce lobbying from both sides of the issue.

"The Commission has made clear that it would not proceed without a solid qualified majority (QM) of Member States," a spokeswoman for the commission, the EU's executive arm, said in an email.

"Since it was obvious that no qualified majority would have been reached, a vote was not held," the spokeswoman added.

Glyphosate was first used in the 1970s as the active ingredient in the Monsanto herbicide Roundup, which is now one of the world's most popular weedkillers.

The European Commission, the EU's top regulator, recommended that the bloc greenlight glyphosate for another nine years when its current licence ends on June 30, sources close to the matter told AFP.

But critics, led by Greenpeace, point to research from the World Health Organisation that concludes glyphosate may be carcinogenic and are calling for the ingredient's outright ban.

Among major EU member states, France and Austria have expressed opposition to glyphosate, while Germany remains divided on the issue.

French Environment Minister Segolene Royal in a tweet said: "Very good news. More and more countries are following France and refused authorisation".

Complicating the issue, there is a lack of a scientific consensus on the danger of glyphosate.

Last week, a review carried out by pesticide experts from the World Health Organization and the Food and Agriculture Organization said "glyphosate is unlikely to pose a carcinogenic risk to humans from exposure through the diet."

That appeared to contradict a March 2015 finding from the WHO's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) which said glyphosate "probably" caused cancer.

In a statement, the Monsanto-backed Glyphosate Task Force regretted an "acute politicisation of the regulatory procedure".

"The GTF consider this situation to be discriminatory, disproportionate and wholly unjustified," said Richard Garnett, head of the task force.

The main European farmers' union, Copa-Cogeca, said it regretted that no vote had taken place Thursday, with secretary general Pekka Pesonen warning that the bloc would be at "a competitive disadvantage" with non-EU countries if glyphosate were to be banned.

Explore further

UN panel says weedkiller 'unlikely' to cause cancer

© 2016 AFP

Citation: EU delays re-approval for weedkiller glyphosate (2016, May 19) retrieved 24 June 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

May 21, 2016
Glyphosate, N-phosphonomethyl-glycine is inevitably related with genetically modified plants. Steven Drucker, an attorney who sued FDA regarding that topic, published a book in 2015: Altered Genes, Twisted Truth: How the Venture to Genetically Engineer Our Food Has Subverted Science, Corrupted Government, and Systematically Deceived the Public.
Certain gut bacteria are capable of degrading Glyphosate into glycine, the neurotransmitter. Not only glyphosate was patented as an antibiotic, it also chelates metals, it inhibits one of the most essential plants and bacterial enzymes, EPSP, which delivers aromatic amino acids for us, which we can't produce. JBPC 2015 (V. 15, p.121-159) article from Samsel and Seneff, states under FOIA, that Monsanto knew about glyphosate carcinogenicity since ~1983, long before saturating fields with GMO's which bind that carcinogen. Scientists knew in 1950'ies, that certain cancers thrive with glycine. It is as if, people do not read any more.

"Since it was obvious that no qualified majority would have been reached, a vote was not held," the spokeswoman added. What is that called? Certainly not democracy or ethics.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more