Newly purchased Newton alchemy manuscript to be put online

Newly purchased Newton alchemy manuscript to be put online
Credit: Chemical Heritage Foundation

(Phys.org)—A 17th century document written by Isaac Newton has been purchased from a private owner, by a nonprofit called the Chemical Heritage Foundation, and they have plans to put the whole thing online. What is intriguing about the manuscript is that the main page is a recipe hand-copied by Newton that describes a method of creating "sophick" mercury—a supposed necessary ingredient for making the Philosopher's stone.

So great is Newton's stature in the science world, that mention of his dalliance in alchemy has been cause for not just embarrassment, but for attempts to hide it as one of his great passions. The genius, the father of and co-inventor of calculus, is believed to have written over a million words on alchemy, which historians have lately begun to note, was originally, a synonym for chemistry.

The manuscript purchased by CHF began, it is believed, as a simple hand-copy of a recipe created by George Starkey, a well known American alchemist and sometime writer. Newton than added notes to the text and later, apparently turned the document over and used the blank side to write a procedure for subliming lead ore, an endeavor that he apparently worked on for many years, once again, as part of his desire to make the Philosopher's stone. Newton was apparently eager to create the mythical substance that would change simple base metals such as lead, into gold, making himself rich, though it might also be noted, that the original Philosopher's stone was also supposed to cure any disease and allow people to become immortal.

CHF has announced plans to put the entire text (which has been in private hands for several decades) online, allowing anyone who wishes (and is able to read Latin) to consider the recipes and note the musings of one of the great minds of history. In recent years, historians have come to offer a more lenient look at the negative reputation of alchemy, noting that in many ways, it led to the development of what is now known as the scientific method. Some have noted, for example, that Newton's work with natural light—showing for the first time that it is actually made of many colors—might have been a direct result of his work with alchemic processes that involved breaking down compounds into their basic components.


Explore further

Early Newton notebook shows prescient understanding of water ascension in plants

More information: www.chemheritage.org/about/new … onal-geographic.aspx

© 2016 Phys.org

Citation: Newly purchased Newton alchemy manuscript to be put online (2016, April 8) retrieved 22 September 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2016-04-newly-newton-alchemy-manuscript-online.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
121 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Apr 08, 2016
i am surprised benni, zeph, cd, or any of the other pseudoscience crowd isn't here trying to establish the validity of alchemy because this was written by Isaac Newton!

i fully expect the religious crowd to crow about this still
they fall for anything

Apr 08, 2016
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Apr 08, 2016
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Apr 09, 2016
Newton was aetherist
@zeph
so... you didn't get the point of the first post?
are ya gonna start posting more argument from authority for justification of a failed hypothesis that was debunked by empirical evidence to a high degree of accuracy?
http://arxiv.org/...1284.pdf

Newton was first modern-type scientist, who replaced the physical intuition by mathematical modeling without deeper understanding of their nature. He was quite freak by itself and he became even crazier, when he poisoned himself during his alchemist experiments with mercury
which was my point

just because you made one find and supported it with evidence doesn't mean anything you say is supported with evidence

that is not how science works. that is argument from authority

science thrives & succeeds on it's evidence
the tech of today is built on the evidence of yesterday

Apr 09, 2016
He was on to something; however, he lacked knowledge of atoms. And no, the scientific method dates back to ancient Egypt. But you would have to recover the lost manuscripts of the library of Alexandria and be able to read ancient aramaic hieroglyphs. However, the idea of changing atoms and molecules is understanding that a little radiation with the correct frequency and location followed by another and another and so on, can change matter. And yes, it would be like writing a recipe. I say he was brilliant!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more