Kangaroos chew over evolutionary theory

April 18, 2016, Flinders University
Researchers Aidan Couzens and Gavin Prideaux examining the teeth of extinct kangaroos at the Palaeontology Laboratory at Flinders.

What if snakes could grow legs, or chickens develop teeth, or humans re-evolve tails like our primate ancestors?

According to new research led by Flinders University, reversible evolution is possible under certain conditions – even after many millions of years.

A new paper, published in the journal Evolution, casts new light on the long-held idea that once a structure or organ is lost during the course of evolution, it cannot be recovered in descendant species.

The Australian and UK team of scientists show that some of the largest kangaroos ever to evolve resurrected crests on their teeth that were present in their distant ancestors more than 20 million years earlier.

Changes in climate, habitat and diet are the reason. As forests retreated towards the coastline over millions of years, kangaroos were forced to eat more grass, with their teeth needing to cut rather than chomp away at their food, the researchers say.

As forests retreated, grasses and other abrasive plants became more abundant and kangaroos shifted their diets to exploit them, says Flinders School of Biological Sciences PhD candidate Aidan Couzens who used a simple mathematical rule to show that re-evolving these features may not be so difficult as previously thought.

"We show that small changes to a 'rule' that determines how teeth form in the embryo have allowed some to partly turn back the clock on evolution," Aidan says.

"Using these rules, we can start to predict the pathways evolution can take.

"We found that contrary to Dollo's law in biology, features lost in evolution can re-evolve when evolution 'tinkers' with the way features are assembled in the embryo."

Biologists have often discounted the potential for evolution to shift into reverse, dismissing such occurrences as convergent evolution, "where similar features evolve independently in organisms that are not closely related," explains co-author Flinders Associate Professor Gavin Prideaux.

The researchers argue that "reanimating genetically mothballed features may be 'allowed' by when it aligns with pressures that determine an animal's ecology".

The re-emergence of these molar traits was driven by changes in climate, habitat and diet.

Kangaroos and wallabies have been studied as barometers of historical climatic change in Australia, Associate Professor Prideaux says. "They have been around for at least 30 million years, and we are discovering more about how early forms were adapted to the abundant soft-leaved forest plants and how later macropods adapted to more arid conditions," he says.

The latest research findings resulted from collaboration between scientists at Flinders University and the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany, University of Kent in England, Monash University and Museum Victoria.

Explore further: Kangaroo evolution maps climate change

More information: Aidan M. C. Couzens et al. The role of inhibitory dynamics in the loss and reemergence of macropodoid tooth traits, Evolution (2016). DOI: 10.1111/evo.12866

Related Stories

Predicting human evolution: Teeth tell the story

February 24, 2016

Monash University-led research has shown that the evolution of human teeth is much simpler than previously thought, and that we can predict the sizes of teeth missing from human fossils and those of our extinct close relatives ...

Recommended for you

Archaeologists discover Incan tomb in Peru

February 16, 2019

Peruvian archaeologists discovered an Incan tomb in the north of the country where an elite member of the pre-Columbian empire was buried, one of the investigators announced Friday.

Where is the universe hiding its missing mass?

February 15, 2019

Astronomers have spent decades looking for something that sounds like it would be hard to miss: about a third of the "normal" matter in the Universe. New results from NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory may have helped them ...

What rising seas mean for local economies

February 15, 2019

Impacts from climate change are not always easy to see. But for many local businesses in coastal communities across the United States, the evidence is right outside their doors—or in their parking lots.

The friendly extortioner takes it all

February 15, 2019

Cooperating with other people makes many things easier. However, competition is also a characteristic aspect of our society. In their struggle for contracts and positions, people have to be more successful than their competitors ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1.7 / 5 (6) Apr 19, 2016
The statement "reversible evolution is possible under certain conditions " is nothing but pure speculation based on scanty evidence which is interpreted to align with the evolution myth.

These authors PRESUME that evolution is real - but is it?
If we cut through the linguistic trickery evolutionists use to confuse and intimidate the masses.
Darwinian/Macro evolution can be stated simply as the following equation:

Simple beginning (e.g. 1 cell)
+ lots of time
+ lots natural selection
+ many mutations
+ natural forces (rain, wind, gravity etc.)
extremely complex organism
(e.g. human, brain, blood circulatory system)

Has this been observed? - NO (Even Richard Dawkins agrees with this)
Is it plausible? -Not really ; There is no proof that it is.
Does it need a lot of faith to believe this? - Certainly does

So why do we teach it as a scientific fact?

Dr John Sanford (Geneticist and inventor of the GeneG
5 / 5 (4) Apr 19, 2016
Is this really "evolution in reverse"? Yes, it expresses something that the ancestors of these organisms had before, but it is still mutation and selection...and the mutation pathway to a better adapted state is a easier (read: more likely) if a lot of functional legacy parts are already present instead of having to come up with a new idea from scratch.

There have been socumented evolutinary changes in the fossil records from prey that is heaviyl armored to predators with teeth so large they were barely mobile to then faster prey to then predator with smaller teeth, and back again. That's not 'reverse evolution' ...just evolution.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.