Moons of Saturn may be younger than the dinosaurs

Saturn moons
The new paper finds that Saturn's moon Rhea and all other moons and rings closer to Saturn may be only 100 million years old. Outer satellites (not pictured here), including Saturn's largest moon Titan, are probably as old as the planet itself. Credit: NASA/JPL

New research suggests that some of Saturn's icy moons, as well as itsfamous rings, might be modern adornments. Their dramatic birth may have taken place a mere hundred million years ago, more recent than the reign of many dinosaurs.

"Moons are always changing their orbits. That's inevitable," says Matija Cuk, principal investigator at the SETI Institute. "But that fact allows us to use computer simulations to tease out the history of Saturn's . Doing so, we find that they were most likely born during the most recent two percent of the planet's history.

"While Saturn's rings have been known since the 1600s, there's still debate about their age. The straightforward assumption is that they are primordial – as old as the planet itself, which is more than four billion years. However, in 2012, French astronomers found that tidal effects – the gravitational interaction of the inner moons with fluids deep in Saturn's interior – are causing them to spiral to larger orbital radii comparatively quickly. The implication, given their present positions, is that these moons, and presumably the rings, are recent phenomena.

Cuk, together with Luke Dones and David Nesvorny of the Southwest Research Institute, used computer modeling to infer the past dynamic behavior of Saturn's icy inner moons. While our own moon has its around Earth to itself, Saturn's many satellites have to share space with each other. All of their orbits slowly grow due to tidal effects, but at different rates. This results in pairs of moons occasionally entering so-called orbital resonances. These occur when one moon's orbital period is a simple fraction (for example, one-half or two-thirds) of another moon's period. In these special configurations, even small moons with weak gravity can strongly affect each other's orbits, making them more elongated and tilting them out of their original orbital plane.

Tethys
Saturn's moon Tethys, with its giant canyon Ithaca Chasma. We propose that Ithaca Chasma was opened by strong tidal forces millions of years ago when Tethys was in an orbital resonance with the neighboring moon Dione. Credit: NASA

By comparing present orbital tilts and those predicted by computer simulations, the researchers could learn how much the orbits of Saturn's moons grew. It turns out that for some of the most important satellites – Tethys, Dione and Rhea – the orbits are less dramatically altered than previously thought. The relatively small orbital tilts indicate that they haven't crossed many orbital resonances, meaning that they must have formed not far from where they are now.

But how long ago was their birth? Cuk and his team used results from NASA's Cassini mission to help answer this question. The Cassini spacecraft has observed ice geysers on Saturn's moon Enceladus. Assuming that the energy powering these geysers comes directly from tidal interactions, and that Enceladus' level of geothermal activity is more or less constant, then the tides within Saturn are quite strong. According to the team's analysis, these would move the satellite by the small amount indicated by the simulations in only about 100 million years. This would date the formation of the major moons of Saturn, with the exception of more distant Titan and Iapetus, to the relatively recent Cretaceous Period, the era of the dinosaurs.

"So the question arises, what caused the recent birth of the inner moons?" asks Cuk. "Our best guess is that Saturn had a similar collection of moons before, but their orbits were disturbed by a special kind of orbital resonance involving Saturn's motion around the Sun. Eventually, the orbits of neighboring moons crossed, and these objects collided. From this rubble, the present set of moons and rings formed."

If this result is correct, Saturn's bright rings may be younger than the heyday of the dinosaurs, and we are fortunate to witness them today.

The research is being published in the Astrophysical Journal.


Explore further

Image: Saturn's moonlets disrupting a core ring

More information: Read the preprint at arxiv.org/abs/1603.07071
Journal information: Astrophysical Journal

Provided by SETI Institute
Citation: Moons of Saturn may be younger than the dinosaurs (2016, March 24) retrieved 17 October 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2016-03-moons-saturn-younger-dinosaurs.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
1620 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Mar 24, 2016
"The Cassini spacecraft has observed ice geysers on Saturn's moon Enceladus. Assuming that the energy powering these geysers comes directly from tidal interactions, and that Enceladus' level of geothermal activity is more or less constant, then the tides within Saturn are quite strong." Correct.

Age body seeks answers for:
Why the chemical composition of the planet has in common with satellites?
How did the nitrogen, carbon, oxygen ... on satellites if the planet composition mainly hydrogen (96%) and some helium (3%)?
How in 100 million or 4.5 billion years ago formed body (satellite) of gas (other particles is below the 1%)? Today we see that this process is very very slow.

The article takes this as already proven thing.
The answer must also be the same as for other bodies in the system and the universe.

Mar 24, 2016
Few years ago, there was some peer reviewed article which stated, that age of Saturn rings is like billions of years. So it is obvious, that either that article was wrong or this article is completely wrong. I would bet, that this one is wrong.

Mar 24, 2016
It's entertaining how everybody pretends that the models do not simply say what they are programmed to say. People have been writing code for long enough now that you'd think that the mystique would have long ago disappeared. But, apparently, when a scientist writes code, it's sufficiently MAGICAL that people stop talking about the assumptions that go into the model.

Mar 25, 2016
Instead of writing articles for publication time that, articles started to provide answers, no new complications new stories.
It should collect evidence for one thing and bring to an end the debate and move on.
Say: rings on gaseous bodies arise due rapid rotation of the body (increasing the relative gravity) and cooler environment. Impressive are due to the large mass of the planet. Pluto has a slow rotation (6.4 days) and no rings.
We say: if the satellite is growing faster than the parent body he is slowly moving away (moon), if is close to the planet and slowly growing on the fall of the planet (Mars Phobos).
Internal synchronous satellites, depending on the mass of the planet, the form of satellites and temperature, other satellites receive rotation (Stix Pluto 42,656 km of semi-major axis). ...

Mar 29, 2016
The implication, given their present positions, is that these moons, and presumably the rings, are recent phenomena.

WOW!!!!
Seems like someone is willing to take some courage and apply it to their vocation in the veritable face of the evolutionist paradigm.
Of course the hundred million years will persist to try and prop it up.
Pluto is of course waiting in the wings to drive the point home that the solar system is definitely NOT millions of years old.

@Ultron, perhaps you need to update yourself on the observed facts. That will quickly dispel any notion of billions of years for the existence of these moons and rings. This is precisely why these authors have now finally gathered enough courage to fly in the face of the evolutionary paradigm, even if they don't want to abandon it completely.

Mar 29, 2016
"So the question arises, what caused the recent birth of the inner moons?" asks Cuk. "Our best guess is that Saturn had a similar collection of moons before, but their orbits were disturbed by a special kind of orbital resonance involving Saturn's motion around the Sun

Pure clutching at straws.
This kind of guess means that even my uninformed and uneducated guess is acceptable.

My guess is that the shape and physical composition of all planets and moons dictate that they all were formed out of a pre-existing blob of material which was forced to experience in-situ transformation of physical and chemical properties. All in a short space of time in order to satisfy the mechanical make-up.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more