Study shows US performs poorly on poverty, inequality measures

February 3, 2016 by David Grusky And Clifton B. Parker
Levels of poverty and inequality place the United States behind other well-off nations in a new report by the Stanford Center on Poverty and Inequality. Credit: Joseph Sohm / Shutterstock

The United States is dead last on many poverty and inequality outcomes when compared with other well-to-do countries, according to a new report by the Stanford Center on Poverty and Inequality.

This year's report, issued today, examines how the U.S. is faring relative to other well-off . Written by some of the world's leading experts on and , the report includes data on poverty, employment, income and wealth inequality, , educational outcomes, health inequality and .

The research shows that, among the well-off countries for which comprehensive evidence is available, the U.S. has the lowest overall ranking, a result that arises in part because the U.S. brings up the rear in performance, income inequality and . When the comparison set is expanded to include other less well-off countries, America still ranks 18th (out of 21 countries), with only Spain, Estonia and Greece scoring worse.

More than two dozen countries were studied overall, along with the United States. Not all were ranked in each category. Among the countries included are Australia, the United Kingdom, Italy, Germany, France, Norway and Canada.

David Grusky, the center's director, said that "we've long known that the U.S. is exceptional, but it hasn't been fully appreciated that it's such a standout in so many types of inequality."

The report also shows that the U.S. performs poorly in many areas that have historically been regarded as its strengths:

  • The U.S. is not a jobs machine: Although it is often argued that the U.S. is a "jobs machine," in fact it ranks eighth out of 10 in prime-age employment among women (with only Italy and Spain faring worse) and ninth out of 10 in prime-age employment among men (with only Spain faring worse).
  • The U.S. is not delivering on its commitment to economic mobility: The U.S., long understood as the "land of opportunity," ranks eighth out of 10 countries in the level of economic mobility.
  • The U.S. is not a land of health equality: In some states like Alabama and Kentucky, levels of average health and health inequality compare with post-Soviet-bloc countries like Bulgaria, Estonia and Latvia.

A silver lining

The report also notes some bright spots. It shows, for example, that a relatively moderate increase in U.S. safety net spending would push the poverty rate down to levels observed in other well-off countries. The rate of disposable-income poverty, which is the rate that people actually experience after transfers play out, is especially high not because market incomes are all that low but because the safety net is relatively small.

"This is good news," Grusky said, "because in principle it is easier to reform the safety net than to attempt to retool the economy in ways that would deliver higher market incomes."

Grusky, the Barbara Kimball Browning Professor in the School of Humanities and Sciences, suggested that if the U.S. safety net were ramped up to the standard of other liberal economies (especially the United Kingdom), much headway would be made in reducing poverty.

A "safety net" is a collection of services provided by the state – or even other institutions – such as welfare, unemployment benefits, health care, homeless shelters and subsidized services such as public transport. The idea is to prevent individuals from falling into poverty beyond a certain level.

Reasons for rankings

Why does the U.S rank so high on so many different types of inequality? Though there are many reasons why "all bad things" come together, Grusky suggested that "feedback loops" may be partly responsible.

For example, residential segregation has the effect of protecting well-off children from educational competition and increasing their earnings, which then triggers a further rise in and a further increase in residential segregation. This is known as a feedback loop, according to Grusky.

These types of feedback loops are, Grusky noted, worrying because they "suggest a dynamic system that has run amok." According to the poverty center's research, offering underprivileged children more and better opportunities for high-quality education, including at the college level, would help lessen the poverty and inequality gap.

It is possible, Grusky suggested, to stop those forces by "intervening in a feedback loop and turning it against itself."

In 2013, the Stanford Center on Poverty and Inequality produced its first annual report card, evaluating how well the country is addressing poverty, inequality and opportunity.

Explore further: Research shows dramatic differences in poverty throughout US

More information: The report is available online: … s/state-union-report

Related Stories

Stanford releases new poverty index for California

October 2, 2013

The sky-high cost of housing in California is pushing many families into poverty, according to new research by Stanford's Center on Poverty and Inequality and the Public Policy Institute of California.

Scholars issue plan to reduce poverty

May 19, 2015

Stanford scholars and other experts on California's low-income population have unveiled a new initiative – the Equal Opportunity Plan – aimed at dramatically reducing poverty in the state.

OECD says Brazil inequality persists

October 23, 2013

Brazil may have cut the number of people living in poverty in recent years but inequality persists and better education is needed, the OECD said Tuesday.

Recommended for you

Metacognition training boosts gen chem exam scores

October 20, 2017

It's a lesson in scholastic humility: You waltz into an exam, confident that you've got a good enough grip on the class material to swing an 80 percent or so, maybe a 90 if some of the questions go your way.

Scientists see order in complex patterns of river deltas

October 19, 2017

River deltas, with their intricate networks of waterways, coastal barrier islands, wetlands and estuaries, often appear to have been formed by random processes, but scientists at the University of California, Irvine and other ...

Six degrees of separation: Why it is a small world after all

October 19, 2017

It's a small world after all - and now science has explained why. A study conducted by the University of Leicester and KU Leuven, Belgium, examined how small worlds emerge spontaneously in all kinds of networks, including ...

Ancient DNA offers new view on saber-toothed cats' past

October 19, 2017

Researchers who've analyzed the complete mitochondrial genomes from ancient samples representing two species of saber-toothed cats have a new take on the animals' history over the last 50,000 years. The data suggest that ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Feb 03, 2016
What we are experiencing is the stock market collapse that was due to greed. After WW II there was a rush to exploit Europe's prostrate economic condition by investing in western land to produce meat, milk, vegetables, and it worked so well for the elites, we are repeating it again with unending wars that produce collapsed areas which then are economically exploited. Only the powers that be have corralled the stock market with an algorithm that is manipulated.
I do not consider being trapped in in poverty by the closure of the economy a silver lining.
5 / 5 (1) Feb 04, 2016
Tax--a word missing in the article. The US keeps it low. Whether that is right or wrong it has a knock on effect on the government's ability to reduce poverty.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.