It had been thought that all ants, wasps and other eusocial insects used a common class of chemical compounds to distinguish queens from workers and other members of their colonies or hives. But new research finds that there is significant variation in these chemical signals, even between closely related species. The work was done by scientists at North Carolina State University, the North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, the University of California, Riverside, and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
"These chemical signatures are incredibly important, because social insect groups couldn't function without them," says Adrian Smith, lead author of a paper on the work, an assistant research professor of biological sciences at NC State and head of the NC Museum of Natural Sciences' Evolutionary Biology & Behavior Research Lab. "These signals are how insects in a colony distinguish males from females and workers from queens."
Researchers collected the colonies of three closely related trap-jaw ant species found in the southeastern United States: Odontomachus ruginodis, O. relictus and O. haematodus. The researchers then took samples of the chemicals found on the cuticle—or exoskeleton—of each colony's queen and workers and used a gas chromatograph to analyze each ant's chemical signature.
The researchers found that the queens of each trap-jaw species used very different chemicals to differentiate themselves from workers.
"Not only are these pheromones outside of the class of compounds thought to be common to all eusocial insect queens, but they are not even similar to each other," Smith says. "Each species uses its own unique blend of chemicals. And two of these chemicals are—as far as we can tell—completely new to science."
These new chemicals belong to a class of compounds called dialkyltetrahydrofurans, which had previously been found in butterflies, but not in other eusocial insect species.
Queen and worker ants are all females, but the researchers also sampled the chemicals found on males.
"Across these three Odontomachus species, the males had much more similar chemical signatures than females—though you could still tell one species from another," Smith says.
"Males are outsiders in ant society—they fly out of the colony to breed and then die," Smith says. "Perhaps because of this, they are not well studied. Little is known about their chemical signatures, even though these male pheromones may play a key role in how prospective queens identify their mates."
The new findings raise interesting questions in two areas. One question is: Are these results evidence of evolutionary links between solitary and social insect communication?
"Solitary insects use their chemical signatures for distinguishing the sexes and finding a mate," Smith says. "This study demonstrates that social insects are likely doing the same thing, as well as things that are specific to social insects, such as queen signaling."
Another line of questioning revolves around the new chemical compounds that researchers found in Odontomachus queens. Additional research is needed to explore why the ants have evolved to produce these chemicals, and whether these chemicals may have practical uses in other applications.
The paper, "Comparative analysis of fertility signals and sex-specific cuticular 1 chemical profiles of Odontomachus trap-jaw ants," will be published online in the Journal of Experimental Biology on Feb. 3, 2016.
Explore further: Friend, foe or queen? Study highlights the complexities of ant perception