Dam projects on world's largest rivers threaten fish species, rural livelihoods

January 7, 2016, Virginia Tech
Scientists are concerned about the Belo Monte power complex in Brazil because its placement on a major Amazon tributary threatens several species of fish that do not exist elsewhere. Credit: Kirk Winemiller/Texas A&M

Advocates of huge hydroelectric dam projects on the Amazon, Congo, and Mekong rivers often overestimate economic benefits and underestimate far-reaching effects on biodiversity, according to an article in the Jan. 8 issue of Science by scientists representing 30 academic, government, and conservation organizations in eight countries.

"These three hold roughly one-third of the world's freshwater fish species," said Kirk Winemiller, a professor of wildlife and fisheries sciences at Texas A&M University and lead author on the article. "The 450 additional dams being planned or under construction in these basins put many unique fishes at risk."

Impacts of the hundreds of proposed Amazon dams include forced relocation of human populations and expanding deforestation.

"Even when environmental impact assessments are mandated, millions of dollars may be spent on studies that have no actual influence on design parameters, sometimes because they are completed after construction is underway," said co-author Leandro Castello, an assistant professor of fish conservation at Virginia Tech, who studies how global change affects the ecology and conservation of fish and fisheries. "A lack of transparency during dam approval raises doubts about whether funders and the public are aware of the risks and impacts on millions of people."

"Long-term ripple effects on ecosystem services and biodiversity are rarely weighed appropriately during dam planning in the tropics," said co-author Peter McIntyre, assistant professor of zoology in the Center for Limnology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. "There is good reason for skepticism that rural communities in the Amazon, Congo, and Mekong basins will experience benefits of energy supply and job creation that exceed costs of lost fisheries, agriculture, and property. An improved approach to dam evaluation and siting is imperative."

There is a better way, according to the researchers. For the first time, spatial data on biodiversity and ecosystem services are adequate to support sophisticated analyses that balance the costs and benefits of hydropower.

For instance, new analytical methods can account for cumulative impacts from multiple dams upon hydrology, sediment dynamics, ecosystem productivity, biodiversity, fisheries, and rural livelihoods throughout watersheds. "Incorporating these data and tools into assessment protocols would boost the credibility of dam siting in the eyes of all stakeholders," Winemiller said.

"Institutions that permit and finance hydropower development should require basin-scale analyses that account for cumulative impacts and climate change. Common-sense adjustments to assessment procedures would ensure that societal objectives for energy production are met while avoiding the most environmentally damaging projects," the article concludes.

Explore further: Ray of hope for critically endangered Mekong dolphin but mega-dams threaten its chances of survival

More information: "Balancing hydropower and biodiversity in the Amazon, Congo, and Mekong," Science, www.sciencemag.org/lookup/doi/ … 1126/science.aac7082

Related Stories

Global boom in hydropower expected this decade

October 24, 2014

An unprecedented boom in hydropower dam construction is underway, primarily in developing countries and emerging economies. While this is expected to double the global electricity production from hydropower, it could reduce ...

Better dam planning strategies

January 7, 2015

When dams are built they have an impact not only on the flow of water in the river, but also on the people who live downstream and on the surrounding ecosystems. By placing data from close to 6,500 existing large dams on ...

Could the Mekong's water destabilise Asia?

April 26, 2012

(Phys.org) -- South-East Asian nations surrounding the Lower Mekong Basin should put construction of hydro-electric dams on the Mekong River on hold if they want to avoid a human security disaster more reminiscent of sub-Saharan ...

Recommended for you

Maximizing the environmental benefits of autonomous vehicles

February 15, 2018

The added weight, electricity demand and aerodynamic drag of the sensors and computers used in autonomous vehicles are significant contributors to their lifetime energy use and greenhouse gas emissions, according to a new ...

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Shootist
not rated yet Jan 07, 2016
If you oppose hydro you really don't oppose carbon.
SamB
not rated yet Jan 07, 2016
If a mountain falls into a river and causes a dam, are the far-reaching effects on biodiversity considered OK or is it only if man builds the dam that this then becomes true? If a rat floats in to a remote island the scientists would say, "Oh, look at the unique ecosystem on this remote island!" But if man introduces the rat then it would be , "Look at all the damage man has done to this remote island!" You just cant win...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.