Research integrity—what it means, why it is important and how we might protect it

December 1, 2015, Science Europe

As today's EU Competitiveness Council's is due to adopt Conclusions on research integrity, Science Europe publishes a comprehensive review of developments in research integrity across Europe and the US.

Research integrity is about "the performance of research to the highest standards of professionalism and rigour, in an ethically robust manner", says the report. The report argues that is vital because it creates trust, and trust is at the heart of the . Researchers must be able to trust each other's work, and "they must also be trusted by society since they provide scientific expertise that may impact people's lives".

Research is what happens when standards of integrity and ethics are ignored or abused. The report explores the damage that such misconduct can inflict on the research community, on academic institutions and on society as a whole.

"The fact that research integrity is on the agenda of today's Competitiveness Council sends out an strong signal to European governments and the European research community: it acknowledges the importance of this topic and is a positive step in raising awareness of the centrality of research integrity to the European research ecosystem", said Dr Maura Hiney, Chair of the Science Europe Working Group on Research Integrity. "I am honoured that I was invited to contribute to the development of these Conclusions during the Luxembourg Presidency's preparatory work ahead of today's ministerial meeting", she added.

The Science Europe report published today explores available data on the frequency of research misconduct and the possible reasons for researchers to commit misconduct. It also looks at the potential costs of misconduct, how national and international organisations have approached the promotion of research integrity, and how allegations of misconduct are handled. It provides an evidence base that can underpin action taken to address research integrity issues.

"The evidence gathered in the report shows the complexity of this issue and the multiple actors who need to be involved in tackling it", added Dr Hiney. "Providing training in research integrity, not just at post-graduate level but throughout researcher's career, as well as training-the-trainers initiatives, are definitely important steps in promoting good practices and preventing misconduct, but fostering the appropriate research environment and culture will be equally influential", she added.

As the 's conclusions highlight, "research integrity has the potential to increase the quality of research in the European research ecosystem, thereby increasing its overall effectiveness and impact into the future". The inclusion by Science Europe members of research integrity amongst their core priorities shows their commitment to addressing the challenge.

Explore further: Ensuring research integrity

More information: The report is available here:

Related Stories

Ensuring research integrity

May 9, 2011

Canada needs an agency to investigate research misconduct, states an editorial in CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal).

A new code of conduct for researchers

July 21, 2010

A new European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity will be presented by the European Science Foundation at the World Conference on Research Integrity. The code addresses good practice and bad conduct in science, offering ...

Scientists resolve to crack down on fraud

December 10, 2008

Public confidence in the honesty of scientists is being harmed by a small minority of researchers who behave badly, a conference heard last week. European research organisations agreed to work more closely to tackle the problem ...

Can plagiarism be weeded out?

October 26, 2011

To cheat or not to cheat? It's a question scholars have grappled with for generations. For the majority of students, cheating is out of the question because success can only be achieved through honest and hard work, i.e. ...

Feds: Ex-Harvard prof faked data in experiments

September 5, 2012

(AP)—Federal investigators have found that a Harvard University psychology professor who resigned after being accused of scientific misconduct fabricated data and manipulated results in experiments.

Recommended for you

Study sheds new light on ancient human-turkey relationship

January 17, 2018

For the first time, research has uncovered the origins of the earliest domestic turkeys in ancient Mexico. The study also suggests turkeys weren't only prized for their meat—with demand for the birds soaring with the Mayans ...

Lifting barriers to citizenship for low-income immigrants

January 15, 2018

Taking the Oath of Allegiance at a naturalization ceremony is an emotional moment for many immigrants, and for good reason: it is the culmination of an often arduous process and many years of striving. Citizenship also opens ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.