New model more accurately tracks gases for underground nuclear explosion detection

December 17, 2015, Los Alamos National Laboratory

Scientists at Los Alamos National Laboratory have developed a new, more thorough method for detecting underground nuclear explosions (UNEs) by coupling two fundamental elements—seismic models with gas-flow models—to create a more complete picture of how an explosion's evidence (radionuclide gases) seep to the surface. Their findings will appear in today's edition of the journal Nature's Scientific Reports in a paper titled, "Radionuclide Gas Transport through Nuclear Explosion-Generated Fracture Networks."

"The research is novel because it represents an integrated science approach," said Dale Anderson, the project lead and co-author of the paper. "Our field has never integrated seismology and the seismic processes that create fracture pathways with our nuclear-waste-remediation experts that know how radionuclides get through to the rock. You can't do gas seepage unless you understand the pipes and the size of the pipes that go to the surface of the earth. The solution to the problem could not have been advanced without the significant integration of these two sciences."

Underground nuclear weapon testing produces radionuclide gases that may seep to the surface, which is affected by many factors. These include fractures in the rock caused by the explosion's shock waves that create pathways for the gas to escape plus the effect of changes in atmospheric pressure that affect the gases' movement.

Atmospheric pumping of gas through explosion-fractured rock is investigated using a new, sequentially coupled hydrodynamic rock damage/gas transport model. Previous models used a simplified approach, modeling how the gas flows but not coupling that with the explosion rock fracture models through which the gases escape: the seismology and damage. There are major differences between predictions using a realistic fracture network and prior results that did not couple models. For example, simplified fracture models produced some predictive information about the gas movement, but they did not provide the directionally dependent information—that is, whether the gas moved horizontally or upwards through the rock. Thus the new calculations are able to give a better idea of how much gas may be migrating horizontally away from the location of underground explosions using knowledge about atmospheric conditions (e.g., the barometric pressure that creates a vacuum) and seasonal variabilities in different regions.

This team's research investigated the effects of the fracture network on late-time seepage (weeks to months) of radionuclide gases that migrate through explosion-enhanced fracture networks. The simulations were created for one kiloton UNEs in granite and tuff at burial depths of 125, 250 and 390 meters. Rock damage was simulated in a two-dimensional axisymmetric model using the CASH (CAmpell-SHashkov) hydrocode, a computer code for modeling shock propagation. Barometric data, of great importance to the accuracy of the models and simulations, were selected from the varied climates of Colorado, Alaska and Hawaii across different seasons and modeled with FEHM (Finite Element Heat and Mass transfer code) developed at LANL. Rather than a generic mathematical model, this research included first-principle seismology, chemistry and experimental data to improve the ensemble model.

Predicting the travel time, window of opportunity for detection and concentration of radionuclide gases from UNEs is of considerable importance to explosion monitoring.

In addition to nuclear explosion monitoring, this team's coupled model could be applied to other geophysical systems that produce fractures with subsequent flow, such as hydraulic fracturing for fossil fuels, wastewater injection, mine explosions and damaged rock zones around excavations. The gas transport results are relevant to other applications, such as radon and methane migration, soil vapor extraction for cleanup of contaminated sites and landfill migration.

Explore further: Seismic signature of small underground chemical blasts linked to gas released in explosion

Related Stories

How long does it take to make a natural fracture?

August 4, 2014

How long does it take for natural Earth processes to form hydraulic fractures? Is the formation driven by sediment compaction, oil and gas generation, or something else? What role do these natural fractures play in modern ...

Investigate 'comminution' as an alternative to fracking

January 13, 2014

( —Hydraulic fracturing, popularly known as fracking—a method used to extract oil and natural gas from rock deep within the earth—has great economic benefits for the U.S. but not without environmental costs. ...

3-D Earth model more accurately pinpoints explosions

October 28, 2013

During the Cold War, U.S. and international monitoring agencies could detect nuclear tests and measure their size. Today, they seek to pinpoint much smaller explosives tests. Under the sponsorship of the National Nuclear ...

Recommended for you

Scientists create diodes made of light

March 16, 2018

Photonics researchers at the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) have achieved the extra-ordinary by creating a diode consisting of light that can be used, for the first time, in miniaturised photonic circuits, as published ...

Quantum speed limits are not actually quantum

March 15, 2018

Quantum mechanics has fundamental speed limits—upper bounds on the rate at which quantum systems can evolve. However, two groups working independently have published papers showing for the first time that quantum speed ...

The view from inside supersonic combustion

March 15, 2018

In a jet engine, the flow of air is slowed down to increase the temperature and pressure for combustion—burning fuel with the right ratio of fuel and air to conquer drag allows for acceleration.


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.