Review: YouTube Music keeps the video groove going

November 14, 2015 byRyan Nakashima
Review: YouTube Music keeps the video groove going
This photo shows the YouTube Music app on a mobile phone on Friday, Nov. 13, 2015, in Los Angeles. If you were going to reinvent MTV for a mobile generation, you'd probably come up with something like YouTube Music. It's a video-first music service that also plays in the background like you'd expect a music app to do. (AP Photo/Richard Vogel)

If you were going to reinvent MTV for a mobile generation, you'd probably come up with something like YouTube Music. It's a video-first music service that also plays in the background like you'd expect a music app to do. That sets it apart from other music apps out there, many of which give you a choice of videos or songs, but not interchangeably.

But while YouTube Music offers a lot of interesting features, most of them require a subscription to the new YouTube Red service, which will set you back $10 a month—$13 if you sign up through YouTube's iPhone . Without Red, YouTube Music will play ads similar to what you see on YouTube proper, and several other functions won't work at all. YouTube is offering new users a 14-day free trial to Red, but to continue commercial free, you'll need to pony up.

YouTube Music is first and foremost a - app, albeit one that doesn't forget that most people will be using it on their phones. For those times you'd rather just listen instead of watching, you can hit a toggle that switches the app to audio-only mode, which turns off the video playback and swaps in a still image. You can even turn off the screen and keep listening while you do something else.

But here's the first gotcha: Audio-only mode only works for paid subscribers. I also found the audio-only toggle worked far better on a Samsung Galaxy Note 4 than on an iPhone 5, where it introduced a jarring pause.

Review: YouTube Music keeps the video groove going
This photo shows the YouTube Music app on a mobile phone on Friday, Nov. 13, 2015, in Los Angeles. If you were going to reinvent MTV for a mobile generation, you'd probably come up with something like YouTube Music. It's a video-first music service that also plays in the background like you'd expect a music app to do. (AP Photo/Richard Vogel)

You can similarly shrink the video to a little strip at the bottom of the app, which keeps it playing in a cropped format while you look for the next video. The app will even keep playing if you switch to other tasks, like checking email—although again only if you've paid up for Red.

There are some curious omissions. For instance, there's no easy way to create a playlist to queue up a bunch of videos in a row. The app does offer "song stations," which queue up videos from artists related to the one you're on. You can toggle the range of the resulting mix with options like "less variety," ''more variety" or "balanced." I started a station starting with Passenger's "Let Her Go" and so far I'm pretty happy with the "balanced" playlist it created, which included "Counting Stars" from OneRepublic and "Burn" by Ellie Goulding.

You can also play all of the videos you've thumbs-upped, which turns that grouping into a crude sort of playlist.

YouTube Music is far less cluttered than competing services like Apple Music, which has more lists and tabs than you'll know what to do with. YouTube Music keeps the tabs to three—home, hot (trending videos), and thumbs up (your favorites).

Home offers recommended videos, and it's easy to find something playable. Your mileage may vary with the "hot" tab; it didn't do much for me, although I'm usually a bit out of sync with the mainstream.

Finally, there's one more fun feature, which is called "offline mixtape." It automatically saves 20 audio-only songs for you based on your tastes, for when you know you're going to get spotty reception. I wish it saved the videos instead of just the audio, but this will keep the tunes turning in a pinch. Alas, offline mixtapes are disabled in the ad-supported version of YouTube Music.

The app makes Google's $10-a-month music subscription a lot more attractive. Paying up not only unlocks features in YouTube Music itself, it also gets you ad-free playback on the main YouTube app, access to Google Play Music, and, down the road, some original material from YouTube stars.

Explore further: YouTube enters music streaming with eye on casual fan

Related Stories

YouTube readying paid music service (Update)

October 25, 2013

Google's video-sharing arm YouTube is preparing to launch a subscription music service to allow consumers to watch videos and listen to music ad-free, industry sources said Friday.

Recommended for you

Paleontologists report world's biggest Tyrannosaurus rex

March 22, 2019

University of Alberta paleontologists have just reported the world's biggest Tyrannosaurus rex and the largest dinosaur skeleton ever found in Canada. The 13-metre-long T. rex, nicknamed "Scotty," lived in prehistoric Saskatchewan ...

NASA instruments image fireball over Bering Sea

March 22, 2019

On Dec. 18, 2018, a large "fireball—the term used for exceptionally bright meteors that are visible over a wide area—exploded about 16 miles (26 kilometers) above the Bering Sea. The explosion unleashed an estimated 173 ...

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

gwrede
not rated yet Nov 14, 2015
For a long time I've suspected, and in the last couple of years I have becomen convinced, being an Apple customer turns you into a Model Customer.

You learn to not just download pdf-files, music, video clips to your iPad, iPhone, etc. If you want to browse pdf-files, you need to download an app that lets you download the file into its own Area, and only then you can view the file with that app's sorry PDF-contraption, because the real PDF-reader only works with content directly downloaded from Apple.

Sheesh!!

As a Linux user, I am not only appalled, I am profoundly flabbergasted!

Linux is an Operating system By Users, For Users. But how could I ever explain this to the disciples of Microsoft or Apple??

But hey, I guess that's the way the world is. Maybe a bit harder to use, but offering untold advantages. That's a little like choosing between an algebraic or an RPN calculator.

Byt this time I've given up on trying to explain either. It's just not worth my time.
DirtySquirties
not rated yet Nov 17, 2015
@gwrede - Disciples? I think you're stretching it a bit. The average person is dumber than a stump when it comes to computers. They just want to boop a button, hear a ding ding, so they can clap their little cymbals together when it works. That's not because they are shills for MS or Apple, they just don't know any better because they don't care to know any better.

And "By users, for users"? The average Linux user is a developer/programmer, so it's really 'By programmers, for programmers". Considering the interface of many Linux programs and how often answers to questions start with "go to the terminal", that should be downright obvious. Just face it, for the time being, Linux is not for the average consumer and not better for the average consumer.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.