Distinguishing coincidence from causality: Connections in the climate system

Earth
A composite image of the Western hemisphere of the Earth. Credit: NASA

Detecting how changes in one spot on Earth - in temperature, rain, wind - are linked to changes in another, far away area is key to assessing climate risks. Scientists now developed a new technique of finding out if one change can cause another change or not, and which regions are important gateways for such teleconnections. They use advanced mathematical tools for an unprecedented analysis of data from thousands of air pressure measurements. The method now published in Nature Communications can be applied to assess geoengineering impacts as well as global effects of local extreme weather events, and can potentially also be applied to the diffusion of disturbances in financial markets, or the human brain.

"Despite the chaos of weather you see a lot of correlations - for instance higher pressure in the East Pacific is often followed by lower pressure in the Indian Monsoon region," says lead-author Jakob Runge of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK). "However, if you take a closer look, you find that many correlations are simply due to another process driving both regions, an important example being the solar cycle. So you use elaborate statistics to reveal such spurious links, find new indirect pathways, and step by step you reconstruct a network more closely representing cause and effect." The new tool detects where major perturbations entering the climate system have the largest global effect, and via which pathways they are conveyed.

East Pacific, Indonesia and the tropical Atlantic are most important

The East Pacific, Indonesia and the tropical Atlantic are the regions most important for spreading and transmitting perturbations, the scientists found. One reason is that in these regions particularly huge air masses rise high up in the atmosphere. So for instance warming in the East Pacific can disturb the Indian Monsoon, even though it is thousands of kilometers away. This can put at risk yields on which millions of small farmers and in fact large parts of the population depend.

"How to robustly distinguish coincidence from causality in complex nonlinear systems has long been a riddle," says Jürgen Kurths, co-author and head of PIK's Research Domain Transdisciplinary Concepts and Methods. "Conventional approaches, based on pairwise association measures, in some cases showed good results. Yet these methods are rather limited. You can compare it to multiple organ failure in the human body - a real puzzle for the doctors. We're glad that we can now present a new approach to understanding the connections, which is the basis for ideally making the whole system more resilient."


Explore further

New forecasting method: Predicting extreme floods in the Andes mountains

More information: Runge, J., Petoukhov, V., Donges, J.F., Hlinka, J., Jajcay, N. Vejmelka, M., Hartman, D., Marwan, N., Palus, M., Kurths, J. (2015): Identifying causal gateways and mediators in complex spatio-temporal systems. Nature Communications DOI: 10.1038/NCOMMS9502
Journal information: Nature Communications

Citation: Distinguishing coincidence from causality: Connections in the climate system (2015, October 7) retrieved 25 April 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2015-10-distinguishing-coincidence-causality-climate.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
33 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Oct 07, 2015
Basically, everything that supports AGWite beliefs is causality, everything else is coincidence.

Oct 07, 2015
AGWites heard the word "unprecedented" on the Weather Channel one too many times, and now they thing EVERYTHING is "unprecedented".

Oct 07, 2015
We all know what an outlier is. It's a data point that doesn't fit and expectation. It's data that is so far off the mark, we toss it out as bad data, experimental method, or mis-measurements. Outliers tend to be rare. The biggest outliers are the global warming deniers. They are so far off the chart bat crazy that they can easily be dismissed as the 'lunatic on the grass' (pink floyd ref).

Example are the two above lunatics. They are the outliers of public and private opinion. They are unprecedented in their efforts to be the first post demonstrating to the world their complete lack of knowledge of global warming. The whole denier squad are nothing but looser outliers that couldn't punch their way out of a soggy paper bag of logic.



Oct 07, 2015
Outliers are almost always the result of poor methodology and not actual extreme cases. The only thing CD85 and Returners have in common with an outlier is that CD85 is cognitively out to lunch and Returners is a liar.


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more