Entanglement lifetime extended orders of magnitude using coupled cavities

September 10, 2015 by Lisa Zyga, Phys.org report
(Left) In the single-qubit system, a qubit is embedded in a cavity, which in turn is coupled to a second cavity by a coupling strength J. (Right) In the two-qubit system, two entangled qubits are each embedded in their own cavity, and each cavity is coupled to a second cavity. Credit: Man, et al. ©2015 Nature Scientific Reports

(Phys.org)—Entangled qubits form the basic building blocks of quantum computers and other quantum technologies, but when qubits lose their entanglement, they lose their quantum advantage over classical bits. Unfortunately, entanglement decays very quickly due to unavoidable interactions with the surrounding environment, so preserving entanglement for long enough to use it has been a key challenge for realizing quantum technologies.

In a new study, physicists have developed a way to extend the lifetime to nearly 10 milliseconds, which is about three orders of magnitude longer than the spontaneous lifetime of a few microseconds. The millisecond lifetime is long enough to implement some quantum algorithms and protocols, and is expected to be extended further in the future.

The researchers, Zhong-Xiao Man and Yun-Jie Xia at Qufu Normal University in China, along with Rosario Lo Franco at the University of Palermo in Italy, the University of São Paulo in Brazil, and The University of Nottingham in the UK, have published their paper in a recent issue of Nature's Scientific Reports.

The new set-up is relatively simple, consisting of a qubit embedded in a cavity—something that traps the qubit and holds it in place—which in turn is coupled to a second, empty cavity. Since this system contains just one qubit, it exhibits , which is the simultaneous coexistence of multiple states within a single qubit, rather than entanglement, which involves correlations between two or more qubits. The scientists showed that they could preserve the quantum coherence of the single-qubit system simply by adjusting the between the two cavities.

The physicists then extended the single-qubit system to a double-qubit system by adding a second qubit embedded in its own cavity, which was coupled to its own second cavity. Again, by adjusting the coupling strengths between both pairs of cavities, the scientists could preserve the quantum resource—in this case, entanglement.

What's happening here, the scientists explain, is that adjusting the cavity coupling strength inhibits the qubits' spontaneous emission, which would otherwise dissipate into the environment and lead to entanglement decay. As the coupling strength between cavities is gradually increased, the entanglement dynamics undergo multiple transitions between two regimes (the so-called Markovian, or memoryless, and non-Markovian, or memory-keeping, regimes). Every time the dynamics enter the non-Markovian regime, the entanglement experiences a partial revival after decaying, although it eventually decays completely.

In theory, entanglement could be preserved indefinitely if the cavities without qubits were "perfect," meaning they do not leak any photons and therefore have an infinite quality factor. Due to steady progress in the field of circuit quantum electrodynamics (cQED), achieving higher quality factors may further improve the lifetime. The method is also promising in that it can be extended to more than two qubits, while keeping the qubits separated, which are requirements for realizing complex quantum information and computation protocols.

"We stress that the condition of noninteracting separated is desirable in order to individually address them for quantum information and computation tasks," Lo Franco said.

Explore further: For faster battery charging, try a quantum battery?

More information: Zhong-Xiao Man, et al. "Cavity-based architecture to preserve quantum coherence and entanglement." Nature Scientific Reports 5, 13843 (2015). DOI: 10.1038/srep13843. Also at: arXiv:1508.01675 [quant-ph]

Related Stories

For faster battery charging, try a quantum battery?

August 3, 2015

(Phys.org)—Physicists have shown that a quantum battery—basically, a quantum system such as a qubit that stores energy in its quantum states—can theoretically be charged at a faster rate than conventional batteries. ...

Entanglement recycling makes teleportation more practical

January 17, 2013

(Phys.org)—Working in the exotic-sounding field of quantum teleportation, physicists are trying to make it easier to transmit quantum information in the form of qubits from one location to another without having the qubits ...

Quantum computer emulated by a classical system

May 27, 2015

(Phys.org)—Quantum computers are inherently different from their classical counterparts because they involve quantum phenomena, such as superposition and entanglement, which do not exist in classical digital computers. ...

Improved stability of electron spins in qubits

September 7, 2015

Calculation with electron spins in a quantum computer assumes that the spin states last for a sufficient period of time. Physicists at the University of Basel and the Swiss Nanoscience Institute have now demonstrated that ...

Recommended for you

Walking crystals may lead to new field of crystal robotics

February 23, 2018

Researchers have demonstrated that tiny micrometer-sized crystals—just barely visible to the human eye—can "walk" inchworm-style across the slide of a microscope. Other crystals are capable of different modes of locomotion ...

Recurrences in an isolated quantum many-body system

February 23, 2018

It is one of the most astonishing results of physics—when a complex system is left alone, it will return to its initial state with almost perfect precision. Gas particles, for example, chaotically swirling around in a container, ...

Seeing nanoscale details in mammalian cells

February 23, 2018

In 2014, W. E. Moerner, the Harry S. Mosher Professor of Chemistry at Stanford University, won the Nobel Prize in chemistry for co-developing a way of imaging shapes inside cells at very high resolution, called super-resolution ...

Hauling antiprotons around in a van

February 22, 2018

A team of researchers working on the antiProton Unstable Matter Annihilation (PUMA) project near CERN's particle laboratory, according to a report in Nature, plans to capture a billion antiprotons, put them in a shipping ...

Urban heat island effects depend on a city's layout

February 22, 2018

The arrangement of a city's streets and buildings plays a crucial role in the local urban heat island effect, which causes cities to be hotter than their surroundings, researchers have found. The new finding could provide ...

5 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Osiris1
not rated yet Sep 11, 2015
Extending lifetime of entanglement is very important if these systems are going to be used as communication devices. BTW...ways have been found to do this and published even on this site in the past. Communication using these are instant, and time of transmission is not a factor. Possibly future landers on moons around the ice giants will greatly benefit from this as direct control and commo and maybe even in image transmission will become possible. This is not a medium that can be intercepted by antennas no matter how large; and that is a reason why SETI comes up empty, A better commo system and a more secure one is being used by sophisticated sentients.
docile
Sep 12, 2015
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
antialias_physorg
3.7 / 5 (3) Sep 12, 2015
Communication using these are instant,

No. Speed of light is still the limit for information transmission - even in quantum-mechanical systems.
(Please look up the difference between information and quantum information and you will see that the latter cannot be used for any kind of FTL remote control.)

There are uses for this instant correlation that do not violate this, howevere (e.g. encryption - which is not a form of information transmission), and - of course - various algorithms geared for these systems.
docile
Sep 12, 2015
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
inkosana
not rated yet Sep 14, 2015
Why do they invoke Qubits? This result is old hat when using micro-wave cavities and can be modelled in terms of Maxwell's equations.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.