California court makes it tougher for music, movie industries to take down Web postings

September 16, 2015 by Howard Mintz, San Jose Mercury News

For a Pennsylvania mom who has waged a closely watched Silicon Valley legal battle for nearly 10 years with the music industry, it appears, perhaps, her baby should have simply been allowed to dance to a Prince song on YouTube after all.

A on Monday made it tougher for such as the or movie makers to secure so-called "takedown" letters that quickly force Web providers, in this case YouTube, to take down material. The decision allows Stephanie Lenz to go to a jury with claims Universal Music violated her rights when they attempted to force her to take down a 29-second YouTube video of her toddler learning to walk to the Prince song "Let's Go Crazy" blaring in the background.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, over the objections of Universal and companies backing its position, insisted holders of such copyrights must make an effort to evaluate whether such a posting really tramples on copyright protections or is accepted "fair use" of widely distributed work.

"Copyright holders cannot shirk their duty to consider - in good faith and prior to sending a takedown notification - whether allegedly infringing material constitutes fair use," 9th Circuit Judge Richard Tallman wrote for the court.

The so-called "dancing baby" case, which has been unfolding in San Jose federal court since 2008, has been closely watched in the valley, where everyone from Google and Twitter to Hollywood has weighed in on the stakes. Universal has resisted, spending years trying to dismiss Lenz's lawsuit, which maintains the media giant and Prince are abusing an 18-year-old intended to curtail movie and music thievery on the Web. Lenz is seeking unspecified damages and a court finding that she did not violate Universal's copyrights with the YouTube video.

The case centers on a so-called "takedown" letter Universal sent to Lenz after she posted the video in February 2007. Music and movie companies send tens of thousands of such letters under the copyright law each year, essentially forcing the material to be at least temporarily removed unless the target fights the request.

She maintains that the video was a harmless, legal use of a popular song, and that her case exemplifies how a powerful industry can abuse the copyright law, known as the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. The 9th Circuit's ruling basically forces the industry to take a more thorough, careful approach to evaluating copyright issues before unleashing the takedown letters.

Lenz and her legal team depict the video as a "fair use" of the Prince song. But Universal attorneys insist the company had the legal right to send the letter in Lenz's case, and that it would be unfair to artists and media companies to force them to undertake lengthy inquiries before asserting violations.

The dispute itself has become so lengthy that Lenz's "toddler" is now about 10 years old.

"Somebody needs to tell these music companies they can't just throw out these (takedown letters) and accuse people of violating federal crimes," Lenz told the San Jose Mercury News in a 2008 interview. "I didn't like feeling like I'd done something wrong, even though I knew I hadn't. It made me panic."

Explore further: Appeals court sides with Google in anti-Muslim film case

61 shares

Related Stories

Appeals court sides with Google in anti-Muslim film case

May 18, 2015

A federal appeals court panel should not have forced YouTube to take down an anti-Muslim film that sparked violence in the Middle East and death threats to actors, a larger group of judges ruled Monday in a victory for free ...

Justices won't hear Google appeal in dispute with Oracle

June 29, 2015

The Supreme Court is staying out of a long-running legal battle between technology giants Oracle and Google over copyright protection for a computer program that powers most of the world's smartphones and computer tablets.

Viacom to NY court: Scrap YouTube copyright ruling

October 18, 2011

A lawyer for Viacom Inc. warned an appeals court panel Tuesday that there will be greater exploitation of copyright material on the Internet if the court lets YouTube get away with a business built on "rampant copyright infringement."

YouTube ordered to take down anti-Muslim film

February 27, 2014

(AP)—A U.S. appeals court ordered YouTube on Wednesday to take down an anti-Muslim film that sparked violent riots in parts of the Middle East and death threats to the actors.

US court deals blow to digital music resales

April 1, 2013

A US federal court has dealt a blow to a music website offering sales of "pre-owned" digital music, ruling that it violates copyright law by making illegal reproductions.

Viacom-YouTube secrets to be exposed in lawsuit

March 17, 2010

(AP) -- A legal tussle pitting media conglomerate Viacom Inc. against online video leader YouTube is about to get dirtier as a federal judge prepares to release documents that will expose their secrets and other confidential ...

Recommended for you

Technology near for real-time TV political fact checks

January 18, 2019

A Duke University team expects to have a product available for election year that will allow television networks to offer real-time fact checks onscreen when a politician makes a questionable claim during a speech or debate.

Privacy becomes a selling point at tech show

January 7, 2019

Apple is not among the exhibitors at the 2019 Consumer Electronics Show, but that didn't prevent the iPhone maker from sending a message to attendees on a large billboard.

China's Huawei unveils chip for global big data market

January 7, 2019

Huawei Technologies Ltd. showed off a new processor chip for data centers and cloud computing Monday, expanding into new and growing markets despite Western warnings the company might be a security risk.

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.