Study finds racial disparity between what black and white borrowers pay for home mortgages

Racial disparity in mortgage rates is widespread between black and white borrowers, according to a newly published study which found more financially vulnerable black women suffer the most.

The study, led by Ping Cheng, Ph.D., professor of finance in Florida Atlantic University's College of Business, used data from three waves of U.S. Survey of Consumer Finance and found that black on average pay about 29 basis points more than comparable white borrowers, or .29 percent more. Their article was published in the July 2015 issue of The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics.

Cheng and his fellow researchers, Zhenghou Lin, Ph.D., and Yingchun Liu, Ph.D., of California State University, Fullerton, found that the rate disparity mainly occurs to young black borrowers with low education, as well as those borrowers whose income and credit disqualify them for prime lending rates. Additionally, among borrowers in the higher rate groups, seem to receive much more disparate treatment than black men.

"Our finding is that there is a discrepancy between blacks and whites in terms of rates," Cheng said. "When we further dig into the data, we find that generally the low-income black women who are heads of households pay the highest. They are the most vulnerable to subprime lending and higher mortgage rates."

Among women borrowers who fail to qualify for the low-rate (prime) mortgages, black women on average are charged 57.36 basis points (or 0.5736 percent) more than their white counterparts. For a typical $250,000, 30-year mortgage at the current prevailing rate of 3.75 percent per year, the rate difference implies an extra $82.86 per month in mortgage payment for the black women borrower.

If this $82.86 per month was placed in some kind of savings or investment account earning a modest 2 percent per year, the balance would reach $40,825 when the loan is paid off at the end of 30 years. This is the amount of wealth the black women borrowers would lose compared to their white counterparts.

"When all the traditional variables are controlled - similar mortgage product, similar income level, similar education level, similar shopping behavior - blacks overall as a group end up paying a higher rate on average," Cheng said.

Empirical studies running statistical models are not able to answer the question of why such discrepancies exist. However, the study's findings suggest the risk perception for lower-income black women is worse than that for white borrowers with comparable income and credit quality, Cheng explained.

"We can only suggest correlations," he added. "We can only say this high rate discrepancy is consistent with the behavior of racial discrimination, but we cannot say it is the result of racial discrimination."

Explore further

Wealthier minorities more likely than white counterparts to receive subprime loans, study finds

Citation: Study finds racial disparity between what black and white borrowers pay for home mortgages (2015, August 19) retrieved 20 July 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Aug 19, 2015
This shows, no news is not necessarily good news.
This is a "no news" study and article. These facts were well established and made national news decades ago. This information simply shows nothing has changed.

Aug 19, 2015
0.57% difference doesn't even begin to compensate for the difference in risks to the banks. Nor did they show that the applicants had equal incomes, equal reliability of incomes, equal existing debt loads, equal reliability in paying bills... they likely can't show that because it isn't true.

What this study actually goes a long way to showing is that Black mortgages are heavily subsidized.

Aug 19, 2015
This article would have been better if it actually listed the criteria that was used here to compare the groups, whether historical foreclosure/late payment data was used (I'd expect actuaries to use these), how the researcher's criteria compared to what the mortgage actuaries use, and if there were racial disparities in foreclosure/late payment history.

Lacking that, I wouldn't be surprised if this study was designed to show a racial disparity, and was funded by government bureaucrats looking for evidence of racial discrimination, to further their desire to control mortgage lending. Otherwise a lender could cater to this discriminated class, get a big piece of the market, and make money from the discrimination.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more