Human societies think fast and slow in cycles, mathematicians find

August 12, 2015 by Anne Ju, Cornell University
Credit: George Hodan/public domain

As humans have evolved, so has our capacity to think rationally and use resources wisely - right? Not necessarily. According to Cornell research, careful, deliberate decision-making is in constant competition with the more knee-jerk type of behavior.

Cornell mathematicians have developed a theoretical model to study the dynamics between " fast and slow" - the distinction between human that is quick and intuitive, versus slow and rational. Behavioral psychologists call this the difference between "automatic" and "controlled" processing.

Their model is detailed in a paper, "Evolutionary game dynamics of controlled and automatic decision-making," published July 27 in the journal Chaos. Its first author is Danielle Toupo, a graduate student with Steven Strogatz, the Jacob Gould Schurman Professor of Applied Mathematics, and it is co-authored by Jonathan Cohen of Princeton University and David Rand '04 of Yale University.

The project germinated with Rand, an assistant professor of psychology and economics at Yale, who studies the distinction between these two modes of human decision-making.

The researchers used their to gain insight into the interaction between fast and slow thinkers foraging for resources within an evolving population. Their results shed light on how evolution has shaped human thought.

They discovered instances in which thinking fast and slow coexist stably, and some in which one mode reigns supreme. At other times, though, cycles emerged: slow, controlled thinking at first rose to prominence, only to be deposed by fast, automatic thinking, which was then replaced by slow thinking, and so on.

"Depending on the amount of resources available, we showed that there are times when the fast thinkers dominate the world, and there are times when slow thinkers dominate the world, but a boundary exists where we actually see oscillations between both," Toupo said. "Coming from a dynamical systems background, our goal was to see whether there is a region in the resource space where these cycles occurred."

A coarser way of describing automatic versus controlled processing is to think of it as emotion versus reason, Rand said.

"In both neuroscience and psychology, there is a great deal of evidence for the existence of these two different kinds of cognitive processes," he said. "What I'm interested in is understanding why they came to be the way that they are."

Though it's nice to think humans have evolved over time into progressively more rational beings, the model shows that this may not be true; instead, rational thinking can go through boom-and-bust cycles, just like the economy.

Like the Dark Ages in Europe, Rand pointed out. "That was a bad period for rationality."

Their model also supports the notion that living in a modern world characterized by rapid innovation, technology and enlightenment could mean we as humans are on the cusp of cycling through a period of automatic processing, or fast thinking. It might be because the modern world affords people the luxury of not engaging in long-term planning, and instead opting for instant gratification.

Explore further: Risking your life without a second thought

Related Stories

Risking your life without a second thought

October 15, 2014

People who risk their lives to save strangers may do so without deliberation, according to an analysis of statements from more than 50 recognized civilian heroes, conducted by David Rand from Yale University and colleagues ...

Scale-free networking gives humans a competitive edge

June 17, 2015

Humans arrange themselves into scale-free networks to give themselves a competitive edge according to research published this month in Nature's Scientific Reports. The work conducted by University of Sydney researchers expands ...

Intuitive thinking may influence belief in God

September 20, 2011

Intuition may lead people toward a belief in the divine and help explain why some people have more faith in God than others, according to research published by the American Psychological Association.

Bats use both sides of brain to listen—just like humans

April 27, 2015

Researchers from Georgetown University Medical Center and American University have shown that, like humans, mustached bats use the left and right sides of their brains to process different aspects of sounds. Aside from humans, ...

Recommended for you

Study: Social media sways exercise motivation

January 17, 2019

It's January – a time when students are looking for that extra bit of oomph. For some, time spent on social media might provide the necessary inspiration to get up and exercising – but that time can come with consequences, ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (3) Aug 12, 2015
Societies do not think.
People think.
"Like the Dark Ages in Europe, Rand pointed out. "That was a bad period for rationality.""
Based on what?
3 / 5 (2) Aug 12, 2015
"Evolutionary game dynamics of controlled and automatic decision-making"

PDF at:
Aug 12, 2015
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Aug 12, 2015
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.