Fossil pollen grains found in Antarctica push back evolutionary history of daisy family

August 12, 2015 by Bob Yirka, Phys.org report

A typical Asteraceae flower head (here Bidens torta) showing the individual flowers. Credit: Marshman/Wikipedia
(Phys.org)—A team of researchers with affiliations to research facilities in Argentina, the U.K. and New Zealand, has confirmed that fossilized pollen grains found in Antarctica are members of the flowering plant family Asteraceae. In their paper published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the group describes their research and conclude by suggesting that the fossils represent the family's oldest fossils ever discovered.

The Asteraceae family includes a lot of popular modern flowers—daisy's, chrysanthemums, sunflowers, as well as gerberas, lettuce, artichokes and even dandelions. One of their main characteristics is inflorescence, which means they have clusters of flower heads that form the larger flower. It is believed that they played a major role in the of many insects and pollinating birds and also perhaps that of bees and wasps. Prior research had placed their earliest known evolutionary history to approximately 60 million years ago. This new research has revealed evidence that pushes that history back another 20 million years—to the Cretaceous, which means the flowers were growing back when dinosaurs were still around.

The pollen grains were found on the eastern side of the Antarctic Peninsula, a part of what was once the super-continent Gondwana—back then the area would have been covered by lush grasslands and temperate forests. In studying the fossils, the team noted their shape, size and surface sculpture, placing them in the species Tubulifloridites lillei—other samples had been found in Australia and New Zealand but it was not until the new fossils were found in Antarctica that researchers could definitively prove that they were also members of the Asteraceae family. Further study showed that the more recently found fossils were similar in ways to members of the Barnadesioideae subfamily of Asteraceae found today in South America, which offers a hint of what the earlier might have looked like.

There is still more work to be done before the new fossil finds can be officially placed in the flowering plants family tree, but once that happens, the researchers are confident that they will be placed at a time approximately 80 million years ago.

Explore further: Early sunflower family fossil found in South America

More information: Early evolution of the angiosperm clade Asteraceae in the Cretaceous of Antarctica, Viviana D. Barreda, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1423653112

Abstract
The Asteraceae (sunflowers and daisies) are the most diverse family of flowering plants. Despite their prominent role in extant terrestrial ecosystems, the early evolutionary history of this family remains poorly understood. Here we report the discovery of a number of fossil pollen grains preserved in dinosaur-bearing deposits from the Late Cretaceous of Antarctica that drastically pushes back the timing of assumed origin of the family. Reliably dated to ∼76–66 Mya, these specimens are about 20 million years older than previously known records for the Asteraceae. Using a phylogenetic approach, we interpreted these fossil specimens as members of an extinct early diverging clade of the family, associated with subfamily Barnadesioideae. Based on a molecular phylogenetic tree calibrated using fossils, including the ones reported here, we estimated that the most recent common ancestor of the family lived at least 80 Mya in Gondwana, well before the thermal and biogeographical isolation of Antarctica. Most of the early diverging lineages of the family originated in a narrow time interval after the K/P boundary, 60–50 Mya, coinciding with a pronounced climatic warming during the Late Paleocene and Early Eocene, and the scene of a dramatic rise in flowering plant diversity. Our age estimates reduce earlier discrepancies between the age of the fossil record and previous molecular estimates for the origin of the family, bearing important implications in the evolution of flowering plants in general.

Related Stories

Early sunflower family fossil found in South America

September 28, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- A beautifully preserved fossil identified as being of an early relative of the Asteraceae, or aster, family nearly 50 million years old suggests the plant family, which has now colonized much of the planet, ...

Flies that pollinized Cretaceous plants 105 million years ago

July 10, 2015

When we think about pollination, the image that comes first to mind is a bee or a butterfly covered by pollen. However, in the Cretaceous —about 105 million years ago— bees and butterflies did not exist, and most terrestrial ...

Can modern-day plants trace their New Zealand ancestry?

January 21, 2010

One hundred million years ago the earth looked very different from how it does today. Continents were joining and breaking apart, dinosaurs were roaming the earth, and flowering plants were becoming more widespread.

50 million year old sperm cells found in fossilized cocoon

July 15, 2015

(Phys.org)—A small team of researchers with members from institutions in Sweden, Argentina and Italy, has discovered fossilized sperm cells embedded in the walls of an ancient cocoon. In their paper published in the journal ...

Recommended for you

Frog choruses inspire wireless sensor networks

January 21, 2019

If you've ever camped by a pond, you know frogs make a racket at night; but what you might not know is how functional and regulated their choruses really are. Frogs communicate with sound, and amid their ruckus is an internally ...

Study: Social media sways exercise motivation

January 17, 2019

It's January – a time when students are looking for that extra bit of oomph. For some, time spent on social media might provide the necessary inspiration to get up and exercising – but that time can come with consequences, ...

5 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Vietvet
5 / 5 (3) Aug 13, 2015
So strange a science denier pollutes a science site.
Vietvet
5 / 5 (1) Aug 13, 2015
@verkle

There is no debate to lose. You are a religious fundamentalist incapable of accepting scientific evidence. You are an example of the message and the messenger being one and the same.
jsdarkdestruction
5 / 5 (1) Aug 14, 2015
So strange to "push back" a date just because you happen to find a fossil.

Its called science. Which explains why its strange to you.
This means very little.

To you.
Another find in the future could "push back" the date to 300 MY.

Yep. Taking new evidence Into account and adjusting current theory is science.
Maybe to 1BY.

Extremely unlikely but if evidence supported it then yes. Current theory would be adjusted to take new observations.
These dates are all nonsense, as it depends on the amazing belief in a false and non-scientific system called evolution.

You are projecting the flaws in your beliefs onto ours. Simply replace evolution with "god" and you've described yours.
jsdarkdestruction
5 / 5 (1) Aug 15, 2015
Should be "to take new observations into account" above.
OdinsAcolyte
not rated yet Aug 25, 2015
Ancient flowers.
Beautiful.
Yes life evolves as does this old Earth and the sun and the Universe.
It is much more magical than the silly old tales told by wandering shepherds and no less miraculous. I like that thought better than the thought that God placed the fossils in the earth just to lie to us. What nonsense. If a thing seems foolish to man how much more foolish is it to God? Deniers of science are modern Luddites. They fight a battle against a genie that may never be returned to the bottle.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.