Supreme Court to decide fate of EPA mercury rule with billions at stake

The justices of the nation's highest court are weighing whether the Environmental Protection Agency should have considered potential compliance costs before proceeding with a rule that requires power plants to reduce their mercury emissions. In March, lawyers from the government and industry presented their sides to the Supreme Court, which could decide the matter in June, according to an article in Chemical & Engineering News (C&EN), the weekly newsmagazine of the American Chemical Society.

Glenn Hess, a senior correspondent at C&EN, notes that the EPA developed the requirement, called the Mercury & Air Toxics Standard, to curb the negative health effects of mercury and other air pollutants. The agency estimates that although the regulation will cost industry about $9.6 billion per year to fulfill, it will produce between $37 billion and $90 billion in health care savings annually. Opponents argued that these figures unfairly include "co-benefits" of reducing non-mercury pollutants. Controlling mercury would only amount to between $4 million and $6 million in savings a year, contend industry groups.

The justices were divided over whether the court should defer to EPA's interpretation of an ambiguous section of the Clean Air Act and allow the agency's final rule to stand. It appeared the decision would fall again to Justice Anthony Kennedy, often the swing vote.


Explore further

Justices seem divided over EPA mercury limits (Update)

More information: "High Court Weighs EPA Mercury Rule" - cen.acs.org/articles/93/i18/Hi … ghs-EPA-Mercury.html
Citation: Supreme Court to decide fate of EPA mercury rule with billions at stake (2015, May 6) retrieved 18 August 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2015-05-supreme-court-fate-epa-mercury.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
16 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

May 07, 2015
I hope the courts let the EPA do their job which is to protect Americans from the corporations what disregard the people's health. Coal plants are toxic dump sites and need to be regulated justly and firmly.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more