Natural gas versus diesel: Examining the climate impacts of natural gas trucks

Natural gas versus diesel: Examining the climate impacts of natural gas trucks

Some major trucking companies are turning to natural gas to fuel their fleets—and to earn "green" credit among customers. But celebrating lower emissions could be premature, according to an analysis in the ACS journal Environmental Science & Technology. Researchers have found that converting heavy-duty trucks to run on natural gas could lead to negative climate impacts if steps are not taken to improve engine efficiency and reduce methane emissions from the fuel's supply chain.

Burning natural gas emits less carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere than other fossil fuels, but the process of getting natural gas out of the ground and delivering it through pipelines releases methane, a much more potent greenhouse gas than CO2. So, Jonathan Camuzeaux and colleagues wanted to investigate the climate impacts of switching to natural gas in different types of heavy-duty trucks.

The researchers examined a range of assumptions for methane leakage and several different kinds of commercial, natural-gas truck engines. They calculated that switching heavy-duty truck fleets from diesel to natural gas could lead to worse over the next 50 to 90 years than remaining with diesel due to methane's high potency as a greenhouse gas in the near term. But, they added, reducing methane losses from the supply chain and improving engine efficiency could make switching fuels climate-friendly.


Explore further

Natural gas trucking fleet could benefit economy, but has mixed environmental effects

More information: Influence of Methane Emissions and Vehicle Efficiency on the Climate Implications of Heavy-Duty Natural Gas Trucks, Environ. Sci. Technol., Article ASAP. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00412

Abstract
While natural gas produces lower carbon dioxide emissions than diesel during combustion, if enough methane is emitted across the fuel cycle, then switching a heavy-duty truck fleet from diesel to natural gas can produce net climate damages (more radiative forcing) for decades. Using the Technology Warming Potential methodology, we assess the climate implications of a diesel to natural gas switch in heavy-duty trucks. We consider spark ignition (SI) and high-pressure direct injection (HPDI) natural gas engines and compressed and liquefied natural gas. Given uncertainty surrounding several key assumptions and the potential for technology to evolve, results are evaluated for a range of inputs for well-to-pump natural gas loss rates, vehicle efficiency, and pump-to-wheels (in-use) methane emissions. Using reference case assumptions reflecting currently available data, we find that converting heavy-duty truck fleets leads to damages to the climate for several decades: around 70–90 years for the SI cases, and 50 years for the more efficient HPDI. Our range of results indicates that these fuel switches have the potential to produce climate benefits on all time frames, but combinations of significant well-to-wheels methane emissions reductions and natural gas vehicle efficiency improvements would be required.

Citation: Natural gas versus diesel: Examining the climate impacts of natural gas trucks (2015, May 20) retrieved 18 September 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2015-05-natural-gas-diesel-climate-impacts.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
24 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

May 20, 2015
I guess these guys have never heard of tier 5 pollution controls. A modern diesel engine puts out very little pollution of any type.

"The researchers examined a range of assumptions for methane leakage and several different kinds of commercial, natural-gas truck engines."

They don't seem to know the old saying about 'assuming' either. Natural gas engines are about as efficient as they can get now. You basically have to go to fuel cells to get any cleaner exhaust.


Jun 06, 2015
Part of the equation might be how much the conversion will save in particle pollution. If we buy new technology today, diesel engine should have a low particle pollution, but the old diesels spew a lot, so if those are converted, there is a win in that area.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more