Researchers use CRISPR to create 'kill switch' for GMOs

A CRISPR way to edit DNA
CRISPR/Cas-derived technology offers the ability to dive into the genome and make a very precise change.

(Phys.org)—A pair of researchers at MIT has developed what amounts to a "kill switch" for genetically modified organisms (GMOs). In their paper published in the journal Nature Communications, Brian Caliando and Christopher Voigt describe the process they developed and how it might impact the development and use of GMOs.

GMOs have been in the news a lot of late, due to the fear by some that food produced in such a way might be harmful. Others fear that modified bacteria or viruses that make their way into the environment could prove disastrous. In this new effort, the two researchers describe a technique for adding a new functionality to GMOs—an ability to self destruct should they find themselves in the wrong environment—and central to their work is CRISPR, a means of using chemicals to modify gene fragments.

CRISPR allows for snipping and replacing them with other segments, which is the central idea behind GMOs. But CRISPR can also be used to snip out gene segments without replacing them, and that is the part of the system that Caliando and Voigt sought to exploit. Their idea is to add extra abilities to GMOs, such as the ability to recognize a certain sugar. The GMO can be further programmed to launch a secondary part of the CRISPR system when such a recognition occurs, and that secondary part would involve snipping out the segment that caused the GMO to be modified in the first place, returning it to its natural state, and killing it also if desired.

As an example, the researchers modified an already modified E. coli sample to cause it to recognize arabinose molecules—when it did so, it snipped out the parts of the DNA that had been inserted and set off a sequence of events that led to its own death. The team reports that after two hours, approximately 99 percent of those used in the test were dead.

The researchers suggest their technique could be used by companies that make GMOs in two ways. The first would be to prevent GMOs from disrupting the natural environment while the second would be to protect trade secrets—if the that have been inserted into an organism are snipped out before it dies, others that obtain a sample would not be able to see what genetic modifications had been made.


Explore further

Researchers find the genome of the cultivated sweet potato has bacterial DNA

More information: Targeted DNA degradation using a CRISPR device stably carried in the host genome, Nature Communications 6, Article number: 6989 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7989

Abstract
Once an engineered organism completes its task, it is useful to degrade the associated DNA to reduce environmental release and protect intellectual property. Here we present a genetically encoded device (DNAi) that responds to a transcriptional input and degrades user-defined DNA. This enables engineered regions to be obscured when the cell enters a new environment. DNAi is based on type-IE CRISPR biochemistry and a synthetic CRISPR array defines the DNA target(s). When the input is on, plasmid DNA is degraded 108-fold. When the genome is targeted, this causes cell death, reducing viable cells by a factor of 108. Further, the CRISPR nuclease can direct degradation to specific genomic regions (for example, engineered or inserted DNA), which could be used to complicate recovery and sequencing efforts. DNAi can be stably carried in an engineered organism, with no impact on cell growth, plasmid stability or DNAi inducibility even after passaging for >2 months.

Journal information: Nature Communications

© 2015 Phys.org

Citation: Researchers use CRISPR to create 'kill switch' for GMOs (2015, May 20) retrieved 21 September 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2015-05-crispr-gmos.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
110 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

May 20, 2015
well, I could be wrong, but thus sounds like a delivery system for a hidden agent.

May 20, 2015
An increasing number of people don't oppose GMOs because they'd be dangerous, they oppose GMOs because of what Monsanto can be expected to do with them.

Kill-switches that can be turned on or off wherever, both overtly and covertly, are just what the guys at Monsanto dream about.

Just an example: it should be possible to secretly create a form of wheat that works for 5 years giving fine crops, but then abruptly stops growing, unless you spray the entire field with some trivial but patented substance. You might get a bit surprised early the 5th year when you get a letter from Our Friends, saying that by now this is the only wheat around, so you better pay up.

May 20, 2015
monsanto's goal is to control the world's food supply. what we eat goes through them first. that they have stated openly.

May 20, 2015
With new modes of horizontal gene transfer being discovered this seems like a really bad idea. What happens if this kill switch gene proliferates into the wild and then when monsanto uses this molecular switch it kills more than what they intend. Like us.

May 20, 2015
Once an engineered organism completes its task, it is useful to degrade the associated DNA to ... protect intellectual property.
Really takes exploitative ownership of lifeforms to the next level, racism to speciesism.
monsanto's goal is to control the world's food supply.
Me thinks thou dost underestimate the utility of fertilizer a bit too much; from agricultural efforts to war efforts (as in bombs), to even rocket science (as in fuel), it's rather more "industrial" with respect to control.
What happens if this kill switch gene proliferates into the wild ...
Perpetual war is already as wild as it gets, and the extreme dystopian function would be along the lines of, "That's your third violation, Mr. Cave_Man, your genome™®© is deemed dysfunctional, it and its associated microbiome will be disassembled and recycled, not to be repeated."

May 20, 2015
judging by the commentary here, this is gonna be a contentious capability...

May 23, 2015
Zombie Apocalypse!

May 23, 2015
Mmmm.... killll switchhh... they must have read my mind..NOT.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more