How climate change is making California's epic drought worse

May 21, 2015 by Catherine Gautier, The Conversation
A persistent high-pressure weather pattern. Credit: NOAA

California is undergoing a record-setting drought that began in 2012, the worst in at least 1,200 years. It can be seen in many ways: most of the freshwater reservoirs are drying up, crops are wilting in the fields and groundwater is rapidly depleting.

Whatever definition is used for , based on meteorological, hydrological, agricultural or socioeconomic references, all the indicators are showing an extreme situation due to particularly warm and dry conditions. Last year had the lowest calendar-year precipitation on record, leading to acute water shortages, groundwater overdraft to replace the missing rain, critically low stream flow and high wildfire risk.

California and other southwestern states have suffered through multi-year droughts in the past, but how does climate change figure into what's happening now? Can scientists separate the effect of rising greenhouse gas levels on the current drought from other factors? To answer these questions, we need to consider the meteorological forces that drive California's weather.

Eye on the Pacific

California's winter precipitation normally comes from east-traveling North Pacific storms, which are guided by the strong river of wind known as the jet stream. Year-to-year variations in precipitation are affected by a number of factors, including the El Niño cycle of warming Pacific Ocean temperatures as well as long-term oscillations in climate that cause natural variability over decades or hundreds of years. Also at play are normal short-term changes in the atmosphere and the effect of long-term climate change.

Droughts are caused when there is a substantial reduction in the number of precipitation-carrying Pacific storms to reach the West Coast. They are blocked by a region of persistently high atmospheric pressure, called an upper-level ridge (see figure, above). This ridge of directs the jet stream toward a much more northerly track. The result is that most precipitation systems miss California, with some of them going as far north as British Columbia and Alaska.

In 2013 and 2014, the sea surface temperature in the North Pacific was unusually high, which created the conditions for a persistent high-pressure ridge and thus dryness over California. In addition, reduced Arctic sea ice is associated with warmer surface temperature in the Pacific and reduced rain and snowfall in the western part of the US from the northward shift in the storm track.

Persistent high pressure causes a descending motion of air, known as subsidence, which leads to a lack of cloud cover and eventually hotter temperatures on land. And with higher surface temperatures, soils dry as more water evaporates into the air.

Higher temperatures combined with somewhat reduced precipitation – sometimes called "warm droughts" – play a critical role in reducing water availability. In the case of California, precipitation this winter fell in the form of rain instead of snow in the Sierra mountains due to high temperatures. Snowpack is critical because it stores water and releases it slowly. Thinner snowpack means less water stored on the ground for use in the summer. So even a normal precipitation amount but fallen in the form of rain means less water is available.

Uvas Reservoir in Santa Clara County more than a year ago, before another year of dry weather. Credit: Ian Abbott/flickr, CC BY-NC

Climate fingerprint?

California has experienced sustained droughts in the past. For instance, during the medieval warming period between 900 and 1330 AD, extensive and persistent mega-droughts occurred in western North America. Paleoclimate studies using proxy records such as tree rings indicate that severe drought periods happened during periods of higher temperatures.

The magnitude of the deficit in precipitation from shifting atmospheric conditions in today's drought is not so unusual compared with past observations. However, there is also a background of unusually high temperature nowadays, clearly exceeding that of the medieval warming period.

So this is a double whammy for the hydrological balance: less precipitation and more evaporation and transpiration, or water evaporation through plants, due to the warm air.

Running the numbers

So the present drought raises at least two questions: first, is this record-breaking 21st-century drought related to , and second, has long-term warming altered the probability that precipitation deficits will yield extreme drought in the future?

Detecting and attributing observed or projected impacts to man-caused climate change is not an easy task. But there is some supporting evidence from improving numerical climate models and the record of several diverse meteorological and hydrological events already happening, including heat waves, flooding or droughts.

Nevertheless, direct causal relationship is nearly impossible to establish in a complex system such as the climate system because interactions and feedbacks all but erase what appear to be causal links.

Still, statistical analysis of past data can help by providing the likelihood of occurrence of particular events. Also, scientists can run climate model experiments that include only natural variability and then include manmade factors, such as greenhouse gases. These tools serve to highlight and distinguish the dominant mechanisms responsible for particular air circulation characteristics.

These climate model simulations show that the extreme and persistent circulation patterns that have caused droughts on the West Coast this century are due to anthropogenic external forces, not natural causes.

For instance, in the case of the persistent region of high pressure – nicknamed the "ridiculously resilient ridge" – the likelihood of an event as observed in 2012-2013 is one in every 420 years!

Studies suggest that might give rise to a new climate regime, one in which the years of low precipitation will be accompanied by warm conditions, creating the aforementioned "warm drought."

This prediction suggests a growing risk of unprecedented drought in California, and the western United States in general, driven primarily by warmer temperature, reduced snowpack and late spring and summer soil moisture, even without significantly drier patterns.

All of this means that sustaining water supplies in parts of the Southwest will be a challenge this year – and in the future.

Explore further: Warming temperatures implicated in recent California droughts

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Researchers solve the century-old mystery of Blood Falls

April 25, 2017

A research team led by the University of Alaska Fairbanks and Colorado College has solved a century-old mystery involving a famous red waterfall in Antarctica. New evidence links Blood Falls to a large source of salty water ...

Research shows global warming making oceans more toxic

April 25, 2017

Climate change is predicted to cause a series of maladies for world oceans including heating up, acidification, and the loss of oxygen. A newly published study published online in the April 24 edition of the Proceedings ...

Mystery of the missing mercury at the Great Salt Lake

April 25, 2017

Around 2010, the deep waters of Utah's Great Salt Lake contained high levels of toxic methylmercury. Mercury measurements in waterfowl surrounding the lake led to a rare human consumption advisory for ducks.

12 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

gkam
3 / 5 (4) May 21, 2015
We are in the very beginning of some startling changes to come. I expect earthquakes to do a real number on us, no matter what the drought does.

antigoracle
1 / 5 (7) May 21, 2015
Would one of you AGW Chicken Littles check that this pool is not dry.
http://www.zimbio.../Al+Gore
Thanks.
gkam
3.4 / 5 (5) May 21, 2015
No Chicken Little here, while the rest of you goobers were in your panic over the failure of the Bush/Cheney Crowd to prevent 9/11, and NEEDING Big Brother to "protect" you, (the same one which just failed you), we war veterans tried and tried to tell you how you were being emotionally-manipulated. You were played like a cheap kazoo.

Now, those of us with education in this field are telling you once again you are being taken by the same goobers who screamed "WMD!" at you. You think that because YOU panic, we do the same thing. Nope.
Bongstar420
3 / 5 (4) May 21, 2015


Too bad Global Warming caused El Nino is on its way to shut that trend down. ;)
gkam
2.3 / 5 (3) May 21, 2015
El Nino can help with some increased precipitation, but it is short-term. We will probably be in this for hundreds of years, and had better start changing now.
leetennant
4.3 / 5 (6) May 21, 2015


Too bad Global Warming caused El Nino is on its way to shut that trend down. ;)


The ENSO cycle is a natural cycle and if you're going to use the El Nino as "proof" that climate change doesn't matter then you have to accept that the La Nina is "proof" that climate chagne does.

And that's just ignoring the fact that the El Nino, in other parts of the world, excacerbates brutal widespread droughts through much hotter, drier conditions. Climate change will increase the impact of the El Nino everywhere and it will be a net negative. The US isn't the centre of everything you know.
ubavontuba
1 / 5 (2) May 22, 2015
I take issue with this article. The image of Uvas reservoir is over a year old and is not an accurate representation of its current condition.

https://www.flick...90993595

Recently, it was reported as being 71% full.

https://rayhosler...ervoirs/

Vietvet
3.7 / 5 (6) May 22, 2015
@unavontuba

You have a legitimate beef about the year old image of Uva reservoir but not the content of the article.

http://cdec.water...n.action
ubavontuba
1 / 5 (5) May 22, 2015
You have a legitimate beef about the year old image of Uva reservoir but not the content of the article.
Baloney. The entire article is as much B.S. as is the picture. Drought is normal in California and this one isn't nearly as severe as the AGWites desire to paint it. California is not in dust bowl conditions. In fact, California has enjoyed much late spring precipitation this year (for you, Vietvet, that means rain and snow).

And, they're already predicting the El Nino is soon to give us plenty of rain.

But you can bet the AGWites will blame that on "climate change" too.

After all, "Climate Change" is the only "science" without a path to falsification. LOL

Benni
3 / 5 (4) May 23, 2015
@unavontuba

You have a legitimate beef about the year old image of Uva reservoir but not the content of the article.


..........you're losing the luster of your image. Where is the usual diatribe of profanity?


ryggesogn2
1 / 5 (3) May 23, 2015
"the worst in at least 1,200 years"

That was about the time of the MWP.

Of course no mention is made of how fascist govt policies affected the drought.
gkam
3.7 / 5 (3) May 23, 2015
Ryggy, if you are so independent, why are you using our internet? Why not use your own?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.