Black holes and the dark sector explained by quantum gravity

Black holes and the dark sector explained by quantum gravity
Composite image of the Bullet Group showing galaxies, hot gas (shown in pink) and dark matter (indicated in blue). Credit: ESA / XMM-Newton / F. Gastaldello (INAF/IASF, Milano, Italy) / CFHTLS.

Ask any theoretical physicist on what are the most profound mysteries in physics and you will be surprised if she mentions anything other than Quantum Gravity and the Dark Sector. Questions such as how do we reconcile GR and Quantum Theory? What is Dark Matter? And what is Dark Energy? These are what keep most physicists awake late at night.

Suggested solutions to these problems are manifold but all fall short of providing a satisfactory explanation. The situation is set to change however as a new theory authored by Lic. Stuart Marongwe who holds a licentiate degree in physics and electronics from Jose Varona University in Havana, Cuba now stationed at the physics Department of McConnell College in Botswana, provides a self-consistent theory of Quantum Gravity which explains the Dark sector and is in agreement with observations.

The theory is known as Nexus in the sense that it provides a link between Quantum Theory and GR. This link manifests in the form of the Nexus graviton- a composite spin 2 particle of space-time which emerges naturally from the unification process. One remarkable feature of the Nexus graviton which distinguishes it from the graviton hypothesized in the Standard Model is that it is not a messenger particle but rather it induces a constant rotational motion on any test particle embedded within its confines. Moreover the Nexus graviton can also be considered as a globule of vacuum energy which can merge and de-merge with others in a process that resembles cytokineses in cell biology. The Nexus graviton is Dark Matter and constitutes space-time. The emission of a graviton of least energy by a high energy graviton results in the expansion of the high energy graviton as it assumes a lower energy state. This process manifests as Dark Energy and takes place throughout space-time as the theory explains.

This paper is significant in the sense that it sheds some light on some of the most perplexing questions in physics which include a quantum description of Black Holes without singularities inherent in classical GR.The solutions provided in this paper will certainly open doors to new physics.


Explore further

Physics duo suggest using early universe inflation as graviton detector

More information: The paper can be found in International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics (IJGMMP).
Citation: Black holes and the dark sector explained by quantum gravity (2015, March 6) retrieved 19 September 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2015-03-black-holes-dark-sector-quantum.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
127 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Mar 06, 2015
I do believe in faires. I DO believe in faires! I DO BELIEVE IN FAIRES!!!


Mar 06, 2015
More bogus theories for more bogus paper reports to more wasteful spending. Particle Physics is such a pool of science fairytale this days.

Mar 06, 2015
welcome to particle physics

http://selfawarep...ollider/

To the collider!!

Mar 06, 2015
I do believe in faires. I DO believe in faires! I DO BELIEVE IN FAIRES!!!



Believe it or not you need imagination in all fields of science.

Mar 06, 2015
Is this the paper?

https://www.acade...on_Field


That does have the same author that is mentioned in this article and has the same title as the one referenced in the paper link at the end of the phys.org article, so I would say all roads point to Yes, that is the article.

Mar 06, 2015
Original study (PDF). It has nothing to do with quantum gravity - simply because of the absence of quantum mechanics. It's ad-hoced relativistic model.
The Nexus graviton is Dark Matter and constitutes space-time.
Space-time is not dark matter. The space-time formed with particles is essentially aether model, but the aether doesn't imply any special properties for these particles.

Mar 06, 2015
https://www.academia.edu/8604226/The_Schwarzschild_Solution_to_the_Nexus_Graviton_Field (PDF). It has nothing to do with quantum gravity - simply because of the absence of quantum mechanics. It's ad-hoced relativistic model.
The Nexus graviton is Dark Matter and constitutes space-time.
Space-time is not dark matter. The space-time formed with particles is essentially aether model, but the aether doesn't imply any special properties for these particles.


It is best to reference the actual scientific paper for insight rather than the press summarized edition of what the paper is saying

From the paper:
In the Nexus paradigm, space-time is seen as a gravi-ton field with 10^60
eigen states.The Nexus graviton itself is a perturbation of this graviton field or a pulse of space-time.

Mar 06, 2015
space-time is seen as a gravi-ton field with 10^60 eigen states.The Nexus graviton itself is a perturbation of this graviton field
Still not quite perfect at the conceptual level. How the perturbation of field formed with gravitons can be graviton? It's like to say, that the density fluctuation of water (which is formed with water molecules) is the water molecule itself or that the Higgs field is formed with Higgs boson.... Anyway, we can consider this study as another example of creeping of aether model back into mainstream physics - just masked under new exotic names. BTW What the "pulse" of space-time is supposed to be?

Mar 06, 2015
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Mar 06, 2015
There is evidence of dark matter every time a double slit experiment is performed; it's what waves.

Dark matter has mass. Dark matter physically occupies three dimensional space. Dark matter is physically displaced by the particles of matter which exist in it and move through it.

The Milky Way's halo is not a clump of dark matter anchored to the Milky Way. The Milky Way is moving through and displacing the dark matter.

The Milky Way's halo is the state of displacement of the dark matter.

The Milky Way's halo is the deformation of spacetime.

What is referred to geometrically as the deformation of spacetime physically exists in nature as the state of displacement of the dark matter.

A moving particle has an associated dark matter displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and the associated wave in the dark matter passes through both.

Mar 07, 2015
"Ask any theoretical physicist on what are the most profound mysteries in physics and you will be surprised if she mentions anything other than Quantum Gravity and the Dark Sector."

Is the article about just female physicists or is the writer trying to change writing conventions like a good little social activist?

Mar 07, 2015
How can this be tested? If their isn't a way to this theory falls short just as much as the other theories. Ever hear of string theory? How about susy?how about m theory? Do you realize thosr and other theories that can be consistent with observations and explain mysteries of physics if correct but that can't be tested and ruled out or confirmed yet?
Tbh this seemed more like a pr move than an actual article.
I find the idea interesting but this "article" feels heavily biased to me.

Mar 07, 2015
@jsdarkdestruction: in the paper he makes a specific, measurable prediction that arises only from his theory. I didn't understand much but I understood that much. Stay tuned.

Mar 07, 2015
Now I begin to see why peer review was invented.

Mar 07, 2015
@jsdarkdestruction: in the paper he makes a specific, measurable prediction that arises only from his theory. I didn't understand much but I understood that much. Stay tuned.

I see. I'm not a member of that site to read the paper.
I am surprised that the writer left out such an important detail.
With that taken into account it becomes much more interesting than earlier.

Mar 07, 2015
A little truth in another discussion, but it is true in this forum.
Sued, Ether is a substance that no one has yet discovered, nor can it, because it is an integral part of spiritual entities in the universe. If you do not have a choice to accept the existence of the ether, then consider as well as other scientists, that there is something "dark" (as you and others mistakenly believe that it is matter and energy), and to call the ether, then you will easily understand the universe. The universe consists of two entities: the spiritual, as well as the unlimited power of creation in the universe and that entity is formed and the other entity in it "sunk" into the ether from which it is formed and the other entity, and that's all that perceptual composed of various materials and energy. Call this entity COSMOS, because it behaves as modern science can not measure it out and studied. Because he can materially energy, expanding, and partly arises and disappears. The universe is infinite s

Mar 07, 2015
These colors were chosen by author of picture quite arbitrarily. BTW Red is also color, that comes from radiation.

Mar 07, 2015
What some main stream scientists repeat like in a hypnotic trance and called dark matter actually is a manifestation of the properties of the cosmic vacuum as physical object that has a crystalline structure which control power interactions between elementary particles and their behavior, and electromagnetic waves. This structure as a transmission medium carries electromagnetic waves in space and it is responsible for the gradual shift of thеir spectrum when traveling huge cosmic distances. This structure is like a matrix and can reprogram particle properties locally or globally and this opportunity is in the hands of superior intelligence who is our Creator. And because this structure must reserve it properties to sustain the this highly ordered universe, it can not expand infinitely us wants to convince аs above mentioned scienties. So to searching for such called dark energy is pointless but paid activity.

Mar 07, 2015
The science needs to be re-examined all the way back to Newton.

I have disproven one of Einsteins statements in Special Relativity by using the Planetary Clock as an absolute time reference.

The planetary clock shows that it turns out both observers see the exact same thing at the exact same time everywhere.

Why do atomic clocks run differently when lifted or spun?

That's another issue involved in a DIS-proof of General Relativiity.

You see, the clocks would run differently even if relativity were not true, because the Normal force and therefore friction on the internal parts changes as gravity or rotation changes.

Mar 07, 2015
To mention of gravitons and general relativity together is irreconcilable!

In Einstein's General Theory of Relativity the underlying principle of gravitational attraction is attributed to the bending of space-time by mass. This equates to a 'fictional' gravitational force (where there is no actual force) and appears relevant to the root cause in its irreconcilability with quantum theory. And, likewise, reaffirm by any Quantum Theory of Gravity where a 'non-fictional' gravitational force arises from mediation by gravitons. As described in: http://www.scienc...cale.pdf

Mar 07, 2015
@jsdarkdestruction: were you unable to access this?

https://www.acade...on_Field

For me it required no qualification.

Mar 07, 2015
If Coulombs's law stands universally, we should assume that every atom or charged particle are connected by their force field across the whole space.

An atoms force field does not end at atom radius, but extend to infinity. In whole, an atom or planet maybe electrically neutral, but Every charge within has its own force field beyond distance, those forces overlapped to produce chemical bonding, magnetism and gravity. Ever wonder why is Fe=q1q2/r^2, Fg=m1m2/r^2, and mass proportional to proton numbers within it?

http://fuckedscience.com

Mar 07, 2015
More bogus theories for more bogus paper reports to more wasteful spending. Particle Physics is such a pool of science fairytale this days.

so true, it is a nice clown show.

Mar 07, 2015
Hey, this is a great thread for attracting those wingnuts you want to add to your ignore list. :-)

Mar 07, 2015
Gravity probe b, one of my all time favourite experiments, is well worth reading up about.

Mar 08, 2015
Thanks! I was able to access that one. Its over my head too to be honest.

Mar 08, 2015
light is gravitational wave produced by exited atoms. gravity is electrostatic force. there is not photon, graviton, god particle, there is no y2k, no global warming, no time travel. science is just like religion and politic, power to be controls everything.

learn true science at http://fuckedscience.com

Mar 08, 2015
Far over my head but I do understand that equations (38) and more immediately (39) can be checked against reality. Gotta admit that against all odds I just want him to be correct. I would so love for the solution to this stone wall problem to be found by an African educated in Cuba. :-)

Mar 08, 2015
The calculated "mass-energy" of a graviton was incredibly small, so small I doubt we could ever make a detector capable of seeing it. The detector would need to be the size of the entire Local Group galaxy cluster.

Mar 08, 2015
The science needs to be re-examined all the way back to Newton.

I have disproven one of Einsteins statements in Special Relativity by using the Planetary Clock as an absolute time reference.

The planetary clock shows that it turns out both observers see the exact same thing at the exact same time everywhere.

Why do atomic clocks run differently when lifted or spun?

That's another issue involved in a DIS-proof of General Relativiity.

You see, the clocks would run differently even if relativity were not true, because the Normal force and therefore friction on the internal parts changes as gravity or rotation changes.


if you tell truth in any science forum, you will be banned. if is a fact. proof it yourself at http://fuckedscience.com or http://www.thenak...=54194.0

Mar 08, 2015
This article is pushing the aether model rather openly. But the aether models aren't standardized, some are using particles of various properties, some other are using just vector fields. Their connection point is emergent concept, though. The problem with consistency of quantum mechanics and general relativity is the same, like with description of water surface from perspective of underwater and surface wave spreading. In both cases the deform and density of water surface is proportional to its energy density, which is essentially what these theories are all about. But at the first case the water is considered as a dense environment, at the later one is considered as a narrow membrane without any obstacles. Therefore the surface ripples are spreading way easier than these underwater ones and from this difference the different validity scope of both theories arise.

Mar 08, 2015
It's evident, that the full connection / formal reconciliations of surface and underwater descriptions of water will be very difficult, because these two descriptions are separated with physical singularity - the water surface, which is very narrow and thin boundary. In real life it's represented with surface of mater and its complexity. But in the same way, like at the case of water surface it can be modeled with assuming of particle nature of space-time. The particle model is more powerful and universal, than the wave equations applied to surface and underwater separately. Therefore the physicists really have no problem with modeling of both surface of water, both underwater in a single simulation with particles - they only have problem with connection of both solutions in a formal way. From ideological perspective the particle (i.e. aether) models are ignored in physics, because they demonstrate the limits of formal models, on which contemporary physics is based.

Mar 08, 2015
An atoms force field does not end at atom radius, but extend to infinity. In whole, an atom or planet maybe electrically neutral, but Every charge within has its own force field beyond distance, those forces overlapped to produce chemical bonding, magnetism and gravity. Ever wonder why is Fe=q1q2/r^2, Fg=m1m2/r^2, and mass proportional to proton numbers within it?

If proton is in fact built by U and D quarks, then maybe the proton is like one small woman sleep between two fat man. It happens in real life. At least, the 3 quarks could electrically form into a group that we called proton.

We should assume all nucleus have some degree of polarity according their unique charges carried and the structure of all quarks stick together.

An iron atom maybe is a small magnet, the positive pole of the nucleus attract dense space fluid to form a force field that its density/strength drop off at 1/r^3, that matches the observation, and fits Coulombs law.

Mar 08, 2015
the space is negative charged elastic fluid. All things are within it.

Positive charged nucleus attracts the negative charged fluid to form atom. The density of the fluid is Df=1/r^3. Electrons also attracted by positive charged nucleus and stable at atom radius where the attracting force is equal to the repel force. A demo https://www.youtu...Z2oSGqsg

The electrons around the atom is like bond by a spring, need force to push in or pull out from the nucleus. Now if a force is applied, the atom will vibrating and produce pressure/EM wave across the space around it. Every element has certain charge and bonding strength, therefore unique spectrum.

Mar 08, 2015
Hey, this is a great thread for attracting those wingnuts you want to add to your ignore list. :-)

it's a great chance for those phdmonkeys to learn true science.

Mar 08, 2015
light is not wave nor particle.

light is gravitational wave/pause produced by exited atoms.

our eyes detect gravity wave all the time. the source/atom has to vibrate at high f to produce visible light. only atoms able to vibrate at high f. a little ball weights 1g will take a lot energy to vibrate at such high speed.

if you put a bell in vacuum, put gravity wave detector in the center, knock the bell and you should detect gravity wave.

the wave is electrostatic force in nature, so we call it em wave.

Mar 08, 2015
isn't standard model says there is 99.99% empty space within atoms? how empty space stands any pressure?

isn't electron and proton attract each other with 10^39 g? how come they don't stick together? what force/magic keeps them apart? wuantum mechanic?

how many volts is in between proton and electron in a hydrogen atom? why there is no discharge? is the empty space such a good insulator?

Mar 08, 2015
how come they don't stick together?
Because of centrifugal force? Discharge doesn't occur in vacuum. Stop trolling.

Mar 08, 2015
how come they don't stick together?
Because of centrifugal force? Discharge doesn't occur in vacuum. Stop trolling.

discharge occurs in court?

Mar 08, 2015
Discharge can occur only in presence of charged particles, which mediate the EM charge. Which aren't between proton and electrons.

Mar 08, 2015
Discharge can occur only in presence of charged particles, which mediate the EM charge. Which aren't between proton and electrons.

beside proton and electron, what particle carries charge? graviton? proton? god particle? where did you get your phd?

Mar 08, 2015
Discharge can occur only in presence of charged particles, which mediate the EM charge. Which aren't between proton and electrons.

beside proton and electron, what particle carries charge? graviton? proton? god particle? where did you get your phd?

Joe,
It helps if you stop considering "charge" as strictly an electrical phenomenon...

Mar 08, 2015
Discharge can occur only in presence of charged particles, which mediate the EM charge. Which aren't between proton and electrons.

beside proton and electron, what particle carries charge? graviton? proton? god particle? where did you get your phd?

Joe,
It helps if you stop considering "charge" as strictly an electrical phenomenon...


answer the questions if you have any.

Mar 08, 2015
beside proton and electron, what particle carries charge? graviton? proton? god particle??
Nope, there is no other particle with EM charge between electrons and protons inside of atoms, which could mediate the discharge. This thread is not dedicated for discussion of these silly & off-topic pseudo-problems.

Mar 08, 2015
beside proton and electron, what particle carries charge? graviton? proton? god particle? where did you get your phd?


answer the questions if you have any.

graviton - is not a "particle". It is just a suggested carrier description to quantize the charge of attraction(personally, I think it's magnetism) between separated mass objects.

proton - think you already answered that one...

God particle - also not a "particle". And not actually found, just inferred from other observational data. It's "charge" is it's spin, which is conferrable to other "particles"..

phd - Don't have one. I'm an artist... (an observer and translator of truths)
Your "credentials"?

Mar 08, 2015
More bogus theories for more bogus paper reports to more wasteful spending. Particle Physics is such a pool of science fairytale this days.


you can say that again

present science is so fucked up. just look comments. in our history no one lied more than scientists. even einstain.

a 100 miles per hour train can not push a man to 101 miles per hour.

the force we use to push us is em force, its speed limit is c. therefore faster than light traveling is impossible.

his n prize is a joke. cus photon is not real thing. light is gravitational wave produced by exited atoms.

Mar 08, 2015
The problem of contemporary physics is not the lack of explanation, why electrons don't discharge with protons - it's a substitutive problem, i.e. the straw man fallacy. Yes, the contemporary science is fucked up, but the naive laymen like you are just helping the scientists in their informational monopoly, as they can always say: look how silly the people would be without us!

Mar 08, 2015
The problem of contemporary physics in the lack of explanation, why electrons don't discharge with protons - it's a substitutive problem, i.e. the straw man falacy. Yes, the contemporary science is fucked up, but the naive laymen like you are just helping the scientists in their informational monopoly, as they can always say: look how silly the people would be without us!

debunk my theory, not calling name. little monkey.

Mar 08, 2015
a 100 miles per hour train can not push a man to 101 miles per hour.
the force we use to push us is em force, its speed limit is c. therefore faster than light traveling is impossible.

You're in the back end of a long train travelling at 100 miles per hour. You decide to run to the front of a the train (approx. 10 miles per hour). How fast are you travelling?

Answer MY question - what is, and where did you get, YOUR phd?


Mar 08, 2015
Which theory? I explained you already, why the protons aren't discharged with electrons inside of atoms: no charge carriers are there. The insulated capacitor charged in vacuum can remain charged for centuries, because no particles are between the plates.

Mar 08, 2015
I do believe in faires. I DO believe in faires! I DO BELIEVE IN FAIRES!!!


You could start by spelling fairies correctly. You silly uneducated twit.

Mar 08, 2015
a 100 miles per hour train can not push a man to 101 miles per hour.
the force we use to push us is em force, its speed limit is c. therefore faster than light traveling is impossible.

You're in the back end of a long train travelling at 100 miles per hour. You decide to run to the front of a the train (approx. 10 miles per hour). How fast are you travelling?

Answer MY question - what is, and where did you get, YOUR phd?

Forgot to add - the train is travelling west to east...

Mar 08, 2015
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Mar 08, 2015
this is the top science forum, cambridge university hosted. to learn true science of gravity, light, magnetism, atomic structure and theory of everything, come in joining the debate. 49k views already in 1 single thread.

http://www.thenak...=54194.0

have a great day!

They're slamming you over at the naked scientist, too, JCCC

Mar 08, 2015
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Mar 08, 2015
this is the top science forum, cambridge university hosted. to learn true science of gravity, light, magnetism, atomic structure and theory of everything, come in joining the debate. 49k views already in 1 single thread.

http://www.thenak...=54194.0

have a great day!

They're slamming you over at the naked scientist, too, JCCC


not anyone debunked my theories, are you blind?

You don't appear to have a theory, just blathering...
You still didn't answer my question...
What in and where from, is your phd? Are you another JVK?

Mar 08, 2015
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Mar 08, 2015
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Mar 08, 2015
https://www.youtu...4QQNYstk

1 is mainstream science, 1 is my science. you be the judge.

i won't use monkey phd to wipe my ass.

Reported.
Also, you appear to be smoking too much of your vaporized woojoo.

Mar 08, 2015
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Mar 08, 2015
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Mar 08, 2015
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Mar 08, 2015
@ Whydening-Skippy. How you are Cher? I really good me.

Hooyeei, you look like you have picked up some of my charm and bad habits. You doing a fine job podna. Keep up the good work, and thanks for letting me take the break.

Mar 08, 2015
don't delete my post again please, have a little merit. whoever did it again and again. I recorded everything i posted. please don't make fun to your forum.


@ Chung-Skippy. Why you don't lay off Whydening-Skippy. He's one of the nice guys here.

Oh yeah, I almost forget. Are you sometimes known as the Gerry-Skippy, the Craig-Skippy and the something else Skippy that I forget right now? Anyhoo to you, the Lady-Skippette with the donuts sends her regards if you are one of those Skippys.

Oh yeah, now I remember me. The NIghtgale-Skippy, are you him? If you aren't you two probably went to school together because you obviously took the same science classed he did together.

Mar 08, 2015
@ Whydening-Skippy. How you are Cher? I really good me.

Hooyeei, you look like you have picked up some of my charm and bad habits. You doing a fine job podna. Keep up the good work, and thanks for letting me take the break.

If someone is just plain wacko, you gotta call it...

Mar 09, 2015
The level of weirdness in the comments around here is simply bewildering.

Anyway, things as those in the article have been tried before, e.g. the Einstein–Cartan theory that introduces space torsion besides curvature. This theory sounds like a quantum counterpart to that.

Mar 09, 2015
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Mar 09, 2015
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Mar 09, 2015
The level of weirdness in the comments around here is simply bewildering.


Our German friends have a word for the vicarious embarrassment provided by the clueless: "fremdschämen." The Dutch have a similar word, "plaatsvervangende schaamte"- lit. "place-replacing shame" - often applied to those who are embarrassingly oblivious to their own ignorance.

Mar 09, 2015
the comments are way better than the article. fully demonstrated how educated is our science community.

Mar 09, 2015
@Tektrix: I think that what we have here goes far beyond ignorance and well into mental illness. But oblivious none the less.

There is something about physics that draws the mentally ill like flies. I sure wish someone could get to the bottom of that and tell me why.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more