Education 'experts' may lack expertise, study finds

Education 'experts' may lack expertise, study finds
The education experts cited in media stories and blog posts may have little background in research or education policy, suggests a new study by, left, curriculum specialist Joel R. Malin and education professor Christopher Lubienski, both at the University of Illinois. Credit: L. Brian Stauffer

The people most often cited as "education experts" in blogs and news stories may have the backing of influential organizations - but have little background in education and education policy, a new study suggests.

The findings are cause for concern because some prominent interest groups are promoting reform agendas and striving to influence policymakers and public opinion using individuals who have substantial relations skills but little or no expertise in education research, say the authors of the study, Joel R. Malin and Christopher Lubienski, both at the University of Illinois.

To examine possible links between individuals' media presence and their levels of expertise, Malin and Lubienski compiled a diverse list of nearly 300 people who appeared on the lists of experts prepared by several major education advocacy and policy organizations, including the conservative American Enterprise Institute and the liberal National Education Policy Center.

Malin and Lubienski also added to their sample a handful of scholars not on those lists but who are prominent and influential in the field of education.

Each person's level of expertise was then scored using a formula that included their number of Google Scholar citations; their years of experience, calculated by subtracting the year they attained their highest degree from 2014; and whether or not the person had earned a doctoral or equivalent degree.

Each person's level of media influence was calculated based upon the number of times they were quoted or mentioned in education press, U.S. newspapers or blogs during 2013; whether they had a Twitter profile; and their Klout score, which is a proxy for social media influence.

Experts were more likely to be quoted or mentioned in newspapers and blogs if they had higher scores on Google Scholar, Malin and Lubienski found. Every 1-point increase in an expert's Google Scholar score was associated with a 1-percent increase in blog mentions.

Accordingly, each 1-point increase in years of experience corresponded with an increase of about 1 percent in newspaper citations, the researchers found.

However, affiliation with a policy or advocacy organization also substantially increased an expert's media presence. People associated with the American Enterprise Institute were nearly 2.5 times more likely to be cited in education media.

Likewise, experts were 1.78 and 1.5 times more likely to be mentioned in blogs if they were affiliated with Cato or the American Enterprise Institute, respectively.

Although the initial list included 287 experts, Malin and Lubienski could not find the necessary information to estimate 52 of these individuals' years of experience. More than half of these people were connected to organizations such as Cato and Heritage.

While the three people in the sample who were affiliated with Cato each received the maximum number of points for blog mentions, these individuals' average estimated expertise score was 4.67 - substantially lower than the average score for the full sample, which was greater than 20.

Perhaps the most troubling finding was that possession of a doctoral degree was associated with 67 percent fewer blog citations and 60 percent fewer newspaper mentions, and fewer Klout points, which indicates that academic researchers with empirical expertise in education are often far removed from popular and policy conversations, Malin and Lubienski said.

"Our findings suggest that individuals with less expertise can often have greater success in media penetration," said Malin, a curriculum specialist with the Pathways Resource Center and a doctoral candidate in educational administration and leadership at the university. "Although some individuals might not have formal training in research methods for analyzing the issues about which they are speaking, they possess skills and orientations that make them accessible and appealing to the media. And when these people are affiliated with organizations that have strong media arms or outreach efforts, they have the support and the incentive to engage broader and policy audiences."

"Newer forms of media offer particularly useful opportunities for directly engaging audiences, while bypassing traditional forms of quality checks on expertise," said Lubienski, a professor of and director of the Forum on the Future of Public Education at the university. "We believe caution and consideration of individuals' expertise are warranted when reporters and bloggers are researching topics and seeking insights - and when policymakers and laypersons are consuming media."

Researchers who want to see their work have impact beyond the academic community must become more adept at communicating via traditional and new media. Otherwise, policy changes in will be guided more by ideology and agendas than by research, Malin and Lubienski said.

The study was published in a recent issue of the journal Education Policy Analysis Archives.

Explore further

Self-motivated participation in learning activities increases the well-being of adults

More information: Educational Expertise, Advocacy, and Media Influence,
Citation: Education 'experts' may lack expertise, study finds (2015, February 20) retrieved 24 August 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Feb 21, 2015
Most academic education research and policy theorizing is no better than the media relations PR stuff criticized here since academic educationalists refuse to use the scientific methods (such as control groups) that are standard elsewhere in science. Those seeking to do educational research should spend a year or two doing proper research in a medical research department.

Feb 21, 2015
Deleted due being an accidental repost

Feb 21, 2015
My high school English teacher, who was born in 1923, and earned a MA in English, said all university education departments should be abolished.

Feb 21, 2015
People have been warning about this all along. But they were ignored by "science" devotees because the "science" devotees are among the most gullible on the planet. A bunch of letters after someone's name only has to look impressive for them to give the liar credence. They don't assess what's said, only whether the person saying it has a lot of letters after their name, or claims to! The fact, for example, that the tons of "experts" on the subject still leaves America in last place on "education" in the world. But it should be pointed out, even actual experts in "education" are not experts, since the stuff they toss about, from Madeline Hunter to "whole language" is nothing more than swill sold to school boards looking to skim money off allotments for new systems and parents self conscious about their own poor performance.

Feb 23, 2015
This article is much too true. The ignorant trying to destroy public education. Some are trying to isolate minorities and go back to segregation. Most of these spokespersons are evil.

Feb 23, 2015
Some are trying to isolate minorities and go back to segregation.

If voluntary segregation promotes learning, what' wrong with it?
Uniforms, same sex classes, are all aimed to limiting distractions.
In today's k-12, if it's not politically correct, it doesn't matter how effective the method it.
The Swedes have the correct idea, vouchers for all students.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more