Shade coffee is for the birds: But even in the Ethiopian home of Arabica, forests are needed too

February 5, 2015, University of Utah
This African pygmy kingfisher is an insect-eating bird in Ethiopian forests. It was among 51 bird species netted by University of Utah researchers who found that shade coffee farms in Ethiopia -- the native home of Arabica coffee -- are good for birds, but that some species do best in forest. Credit: Evan Buechley, University of Utah.

The conservation value of growing coffee under trees instead of on open farms is well known, but hasn't been studied much in Africa. So a University of Utah-led research team studied birds in the Ethiopian home of Arabica coffee and found that "shade coffee" farms are good for birds, but some species do best in forest.

"Ethiopian shade coffee may be the most bird friendly coffee in the world, but a primary forest is irreplaceable for bird conservation, especially for birds of the forest understory," says doctoral student Evan Buechley, lead author of a new study that will be published online Feb. 11 in the journal Biological Conservation.

"The best coffee for biodiversity is organic shade coffee in Ethiopia, where the coffee is a native species of the forest," says ornithologist Çağan Şekercioğlu, the study's senior author and assistant professor of biology at the University of Utah. "It is grown where it belongs in its native habitat with native tree cover and without chemicals."

"Not all shade coffee is equal," Şekercioğlu adds. "Because shade coffee is trendy, there are a lot of commercial plantations in the world where they grow shade coffee under exotic trees, not native trees, so they can call it shade coffee. But it's not as bird friendly as in Ethiopia."

"We hope to see increased marketing of Ethiopia shade coffee so the local farmers get a better deal for their beans by keeping the shade coffee intact rather than converting it to open sun farming" by cutting trees, Şekercioğlu says.

The researchers found that all 19 bird species living closer to the ground in the "understory" of forests also were found in nearby shade coffee farms in Ethiopia. However, understory forest specialists - especially insect-eating birds of the forest understory - were found in much lower numbers in shade coffee.

"Ethiopian shade coffee is even better than other shade coffee because all the native forest bird species that we recorded in the forest understory we also recorded in Ethiopia's traditional shade coffee plantations," Şekercioğlu says. "But coffee plantations are not better than forest, because forest still had a lot more relative abundance of forest-dependent birds, which were reduced by nearly 80 percent in numbers in shade coffee."

Those forest understory specialists "are among the birds most threatened with extinction globally," Buechley says. "That they are much more frequent in forests implies forests are really important. Shade coffee isn't a substitute for forests. But shade coffee provides good habitat for many other species, including migrants from Europe and Asia."

In 2012, Şekercioğlu conducted a global review of scientific literature and found wooded "shade plantations" for coffee and chocolate have greater diversity of birds than open farmland, but that forests remain the best habitats for tropical birds. He says the new study "gets more specific, and shows that there is shade and there is shade."

The National Science Foundation, National Geographic Society, VLIR-Belgian Development Cooperation, Christensen Fund and University of Utah funded the study.

Coffee berries dry on a screen in the foreground while an Ethiopian woman handles coffee beans in the basket. Once the berries are dried, they are crushed with a wood mortar and pestle, and the beans are separated from the dried husks, resulting in the green coffee beans shown in the basket. University of Utah ornithologists found that Arabica coffee farms shaded by tree canopies in Ethiopia are almost as bird-friendly as forests. Credit: Evan Buechley, University of Utah.
Netting Birds in an African Nation Where Coffee is Crucial

Buechley and Şekercioğlu say coffee is the world's second-most valuable legal international commodity after oil. Ethiopia is the home of Coffea arabica, the world's most widely produced and valuable coffee, making up two-thirds of the world market. Coffea robusta - native to tropical highlands in central and western sub-Saharan Africa - is the other main bean used for coffee.

The word coffee comes from ancient Ethiopia's Kaffa province. Coffee has been cultivated in the region for over 1,000 years.

Coffee is the primary export crop for Ethiopia. The nation produces only 5 percent of the world's coffee, but nonetheless is the fifth largest producer after Brazil, Vietnam, Colombia and Indonesia, Şekercioğlu says. "Of the top 10 countries that are coffee producers, Ethiopia is the only place where coffee is native."

Ethiopia is undergoing rapid deforestation from population growth; expansion of open farming for coffee, tea and other crops; and harvesting of trees for firewood or charcoal. The study area is in one of 35 recognized "biodiversity hotspots" on Earth.

"There's been very limited research on coffee where it's native. We expect the ecological dynamics will differ from where coffee is an exotic crop," Buechley says.

The new study was conducted in shade coffee plantations and moist forests at about 6,000 feet elevation in southwest Ethiopia's Oromia region. The forest canopy contains broadleaf evergreens, including pouteria and olea trees. There are many smaller trees, shrubs, vines, ferns and orchids. In the nearby shade coffee plantations, coffee plants are grown beneath a canopy dominated by silk tree species known as abizzias.

During December-February dry seasons in 2010-12, the researchers studied seven sites: three in forests and four shade coffee plantations ranging from five to 25 acres. They walked to research sites before dawn the day of each netting effort.

To catch understory birds, they set up fine but strong nylon "mist nets" - measuring almost 40 feet long and 8 feet high - by stringing them to bamboo poles. Each net includes pockets into which birds fall safely when they fly into the net.

At least six times every dry season at each site, 20 large nets were set up from a half hour before sunrise to six hours later. The researchers removed netted birds every half hour and recorded the species, age, sex, wingspan, tail length and weight. Then the birds were released.

Coffea arabica shrubs grow beneath a canopy of trees at a University of Utah study site in southwest Ethiopia. For three annual dry seasons, biologists from the University of Utah and other institutions netted and released birds in such 'shade coffee' farms and in nearby forests. They found that shade coffee farms in Ethiopia -- where Arabica coffee originated -- are good environments for most birds, but that forests are better for some species. Credit: Evan Buechley, University of Utah.
The Findings

Ethiopia has 860 documented bird species. Buechley and colleagues netted and identified 1,692 birds from 71 species during 18,177 net hours. Of those, 1,281 were captured in shade coffee and 411 in forest. The researchers then excluded nine species like owls, raptors and ravens too big to be netted, as well as 11 species that don't consistently frequent the forest understory.

That left 1,605 birds from 51 species in the study's analysis:

— All 51 species were found in shade coffee, including 19 also found in forests.

— Forests and shade coffee plantations had the same level of bird diversity, a measure of both the number of species and number of birds of each species. But shade coffee farms had twice the species richness (number of species only) of forests.

— Forest understory specialists, especially insectivores or insect-eating birds, were found in greatly reduced numbers in shade coffee. "That shows if we want to conserve these groups of species, we need to conserve forest," Buechley says. "And the birds that are found in the forest understory are also the birds that potentially benefit the farmers by consuming insects," allowing farmers to avoid the costs and hazards of pesticide use.

— Eight of nine Palearctic species - migratory birds from Europe, the Mideast, Asia and North Africa - were found only in shade coffee plantations, confirming shade coffee's importance for migratory birds.

— "Both species and numbers of forest generalists [birds that can live in forests and other environments] and forest visitors were higher in traditional shade than in forest control sites," Şekercioğlu says.

— Birds common in forests were specialists with narrow habitat niches; more species in shade coffee tended to be generalists able to live in varied environments.

The biologists said more research is needed to learn if use shade coffee farms to breed or as stepping stones to better habitat, or if the shade coffee serves as a trap where the can live but cannot breed due to predators or lack of food.

Explore further: Coffee cultivation good for diversity in agrarian settlements but not in forests

Related Stories

Another reason to drink a nice cup of shade-grown joe

December 22, 2008

A new study published in the December 23rd issue of Current Biology, a Cell Press publication, reveals another "eco-friendly" reason to select shade-grown coffee over beans that were grown in the sun: Shade coffee farms not ...

Birds do better in 'agroforests' than on farms: study

August 7, 2012

Compared with open farmland, wooded "shade" plantations that produce coffee and chocolate promote greater bird diversity, although a new University of Utah study says forests remain the best habitat for tropical birds.

Blame coffee farm rust fungus for rising coffee prices

September 30, 2014

Wonder why that cup o' joe is so expensive? The culprit, says ecologist Ivette Perfecto of the University of Michigan, is a fungus sweeping through coffee plantations in Mexico and Central America, limiting coffee production ...

Recommended for you

When more women make decisions, the environment wins

March 21, 2019

When more women are involved in group decisions about land management, the group conserves more—particularly when offered financial incentives to do so, according to a new University of Colorado Boulder study published ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.