Capturing and storing carbon in soil: Is it real and can it scale?

February 14, 2015, Arizona State University

Can beef production help restore ecosystems? A team of scientists, advisors and communications specialists are banding together to explore whether ranching management can create robust soils, watersheds and wildlife habitat while sequestering atmospheric carbon dioxide.

The Arizona State University-SoilCarbon Nation team is examining the adaptive multi-paddock (AMP) grazing management technique that involves using small-sized fields to provide short periods of grazing for livestock and long recovery periods for fields. The method mimics the migrations of wild herd animals, such as elk, bison and deer. The science team proposes a whole system science measurement approach in comparing AMP grazing with conventional, continuous grazing methods.

Peter Byck, professor of practice at the School of Sustainability and the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication at ASU, is helping organize the project.

"By using measures - such as the stored, the water absorbed and retained, populations of fungi, bacteria, wild life and insects, and rancher and animal well-being - we are comparing adaptive grazing with conventional grazing to see if the former actually improves ranch ecosystems," he said. "We hope to study and compare 36 ranches located in four diverse eco-regions across the U.S. and southern Canada."

While individual members of the team concentrate on aspects and impacts of various grazing techniques, Byck's focus is to discover whether the methods store carbon in the soil, and if so, which is the most successful.

According to Byck, the idea for the project came from researching Soil Carbon Cowboys, a short Carbon Nation 2.0 film made in collaboration with ASU. His feature documentary, 2011's Carbon Nation, focuses on climate change solutions.

"While filming Soil Carbon Cowboys, we came across ranchers who were adopting healthier grazing practices to rejuvenate their land and their livestock," said Byck. "What they did not know is that they were helping capture a significant amount of from the air."

The anecdotal evidence led to curiosity regarding the effectiveness of adaptive grazing. Byck and a team of leading soil, livestock, biodiversity and communications specialists have decided to investigate the following question: What is the best rangeland management technique for significantly sequestering carbon in rangeland soils and improving rangeland socio-ecological systems?

Previous research led by Richard Teague at Texas A&M University shows that ranches practicing AMP grazing sequestered an additional 30 tons of carbon per hectare over 10 years compared to conventionally grazed ranches. Although sparse, the prior pool of studies on the topic provides a solid framework upon which Byck and team hope to build.

Byck, who calls himself the convener and storyteller for the project, said that the communications component of the project is just as important as the science. He'd be filming the entire execution of the project on the ground level.

"Through the communications pieces, we'd like to be able to show everyone how the challenge is being tackled at the grassroots level by people who are just like them."

He added:

"Current methods used to capture and store carbon are industrial in nature and expensive. Adaptive is a natural technology. Ranchers who use the technique are earning more, becoming financially healthy."

Explore further: A little rest from grazing improves native grasslands

More information: Byck will be presenting the ASU-SoilCarbon Nation research at the prestigious American Association for the Advancement of Science's annual meeting to be held Feb. 12-16 in San Jose, California.

Related Stories

A little rest from grazing improves native grasslands

December 4, 2014

Just like us, grasslands need rest to improve their health. A study just published by Point Blue Conservation Science in the journal Ecological Restoration shows a 72 percent increase in where native perennial grasses were ...

Multi-paddock grazing is superior to continuous grazing

June 15, 2011

A long-term study verifies multi-paddock grazing improves vegetation, soil health and animal production relative to continuous grazing in large-scale ranches, according to Texas AgriLife Research scientists.

Recommended for you

Galactic center visualization delivers star power

March 21, 2019

Want to take a trip to the center of the Milky Way? Check out a new immersive, ultra-high-definition visualization. This 360-movie offers an unparalleled opportunity to look around the center of the galaxy, from the vantage ...

Physicists reveal why matter dominates universe

March 21, 2019

Physicists in the College of Arts and Sciences at Syracuse University have confirmed that matter and antimatter decay differently for elementary particles containing charmed quarks.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (1) Feb 14, 2015
Methane is a much more damaging green house gas than CO2 and a huge amount of it comes from Cattle farming be it for diary or beef. While the idea here might lessen the amount of damage caused by the beef and dairy industries it's very wrong to portray this as a viable solution when compared with dietary change which uses alternative sources of protein. Such change could have a major impact on global warming while at the same time help us address the expected food crisis brought about by growth in population and loss of crops due to global warming. Coupled with improved biodiversity and better (though more labor intensive) farming practice this would also enable us to give future generations a world in which a better balance between human needs and the environment has been struck.
not rated yet Feb 15, 2015
It is not a waste of time to improve cattle raising so that we lessen it's impact. Since you don't know the numbers, how do you know this is not a viable solution? Compared to a dietary change, sure. Grains, legumes, etc., are 10 times more efficient than beef. But how do you enforce a dietary change in a democratic society?
not rated yet Feb 16, 2015
If you study the effects of glyphosate, aka Roundup on soil communities it destroys them, consider what that does to the CO2 uptake capacity before getting excited, yet it may force a look at allowing that stuff in the food-chain.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.