The year ahead in science

January 5, 2015 by Los Angeles Times
Credit: CERN

Some serious groundwork has been laid. Some amazing instruments are turning on. Some incredible destinations are in sight. If you ask us, 2015 is going to be an awesome year in science.

From exploration to new adventures in to the possible defeat of a microscopic foe, here are some of the science stories we can't wait to follow in the coming year.

—-

Our first good look at Pluto

Our telescopes take amazing images of distant galaxies, but the best pictures of Pluto are fuzzy and difficult to interpret. That's about to change. In 2015 humans will get a good look at the dwarf planet - for the very first time.

After a nine-year journey across nearly 3 billion miles of the solar system, NASA's New Horizons spacecraft and its high-definition cameras are closing in on Pluto. A suite of instruments will start taking scientific measurements on Jan. 15. The closest approach, when the spacecraft gets within 7,700 miles from the planet, is scheduled for July.

—-

Could this be the year of the AIDS vaccine?

Microbiologists say that new insights into the structure of HIV's protein spikes - the weapons the virus uses to enter host cells - have raised hopes for a vaccine. If they are right, it would be a major victory against the virus that causes AIDS.

In the last few years, scientists have realized that some AIDS patients have developed broadly neutralizing antibodies that are not fooled by HIV's infamous ability to camouflage itself. In October, researchers at Yale School of Medicine and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases showed that these antibodies were able to attach to HIV spikes and disable them.

"Personally, working in the HIV vaccine field for 16 years, I have never been so positive," said Rogier Sanders, a Cornell University microbiologist who studies the spikes but was not involved in that research. "I think the coming year will see some major steps forward thanks to this."

—-

CERN comes back, with more power than ever

The Large Hadron Collider, the largest and fastest in the world, is set to start up again in March after a two-year break. When it is turned on, the two beams of protons that fly around its 17-mile loop at close to the speed of light will collide with nearly double the energy of the previous run.

The collider, which is run by the European Organization for Nuclear Research, or CERN, is buried beneath the border of Switzerland and France, not far from Geneva. In 2012, physicists used the massive machine to find the elusive Higgs boson, a subatomic particle that is key to understanding why there is mass in the universe. The achievement was honored with a Nobel Prize.

Scientists are not sure what they will find this time around, but some possibilities include particles associated with dark energy and dark matter. There may even be particles that could provide evidence for the theory of supersymmetry.

—-

An encounter with a very big asteroid

In March, NASA's Dawn spacecraft is set to rendezvous with Ceres, the largest member of the asteroid belt and one of five dwarf planets in the Solar System. (The others are Haumea, Makemake, Eris and Pluto.) Ceres is Dawn's second stop; its first was Vesta, which the spacecraft circled from July 2011 to September 2012.

While Ceres and Vesta are both enormous asteroids, they're actually very different. Vesta, the second-biggest asteroid in the belt, is elliptical and very dry, while Ceres is spherical and may harbor a subsurface ocean. Both of these "protoplanets" could shed light on the early solar system's history.

—-

More comet science, courtesy of Rosetta

The world watched breathlessly in 2014 as the European Space Agency's Rosetta orbiter caught up with a comet and, for the first time ever, gently dropped a lander onto its surface.

The lander, Philae, has been silent since Nov. 14. But the mission isn't over yet. Scientists say Philae could turn back on as the comet gets closer to the sun, recharging its solar-powered batteries. If so, it may send more data back to scientists on Earth.

In the meantime, Rosetta will continue to escort the comet as it flies toward the sun, watching as it spews ever larger jets of gas and dust. The comet will make its to our star in August 2015. When it does, Rosetta will be right by its side.

—-

The search for ripples in the structure of spacetime continues

Scientists in the BICEP2 collaboration rocked the astrophysics world when they announced in March that they had picked up signs of cosmic inflation - the universe's giant growth spurt shortly after the Big Bang - as well as evidence of gravitational waves, ripples in the structure of spacetime that have been theorized but never detected. Data from the European Space Agency's Planck spacecraft, however, allowed other researchers to poke holes in the findings, leaving the discovery up for debate.

More findings are set to be published this month, according to California Institute of Technology astrophysicist James Bock, one of the lead scientists on the BICEP2 team. The team will continue to scan the skies in 2015 with their next-generation experiment, BICEP3.

Meanwhile, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory, or LIGO, is searching for gravitational waves directly at facilities in Washington state and Louisiana. Although the experiment struck out during its 2002-10 run, scientists are set to unleash their newly built Advanced LIGO detectors, which are 10 times more sensitive than their predecessors.

"We're planning to resume our search for with Advanced LIGO in late summer or early fall 2015," said David Reitze, executive director of the LIGO Laboratory at Caltech. "Hopefully, we'll get some interesting results soon after!"

Explore further: Dawn snaps its best-yet image of dwarf planet ceres

Related Stories

Dawn snaps its best-yet image of dwarf planet ceres

December 5, 2014

The Dawn spacecraft has delivered a glimpse of Ceres, the largest body in the main asteroid belt, in a new image taken 740,000 miles (1.2 million kilometers) from the dwarf planet. This is Dawn's best image yet of Ceres as ...

Dawn spacecraft begins approach to dwarf planet Ceres

December 30, 2014

(Phys.org)—NASA's Dawn spacecraft has entered an approach phase in which it will continue to close in on Ceres, a Texas-sized dwarf planet never before visited by a spacecraft. Dawn launched in 2007 and is scheduled to ...

NASA's upcoming Year of the Dwarf Planet

December 30, 2014

Together, the space probes Dawn and New Horizons have been in flight for a collective 17 years. One remained close to home and the other departed to parts of the Solar System of which little is known. They now share a common ...

Explainer: Why the Rosetta comet mission is such a big deal

November 12, 2014

The first attempted landing on the surface of a comet is a huge landmark in the history of space exploration that will not only uncover further details about comets but could unlock further clues about the origins of our ...

Philae lander on comet may communicate again

November 15, 2014

European space scientists are hoping that they succeeded in maneuvering comet lander Philae into the sun and that it will resume communicating Saturday with recharged batteries.

Recommended for you

Chinese Cretaceous fossil highlights avian evolution

September 24, 2018

A newly identified extinct bird species from a 127 million-year-old fossil deposit in northeastern China provides new information about avian development during the early evolution of flight.

Ancient mice discovered by climate cavers

September 24, 2018

The fossils of two extinct mice species have been discovered in caves in tropical Queensland by University of Queensland scientists tracking environment changes.

The first predators and their self-repairing teeth

September 24, 2018

The earliest predators appeared on Earth 480 million years ago—and they even had teeth capable of repairing themselves. A team of palaeontologists led by Bryan Shirley and Madleen Grohganz from the Chair for Palaeoenviromental ...

Fat from 558 million years ago reveals earliest known animal

September 20, 2018

Scientists from The Australian National University (ANU) and overseas have discovered molecules of fat in an ancient fossil to reveal the earliest confirmed animal in the geological record that lived on Earth 558 million ...

155 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Nashingun
1 / 5 (9) Jan 05, 2015
Wasting too much of your time on things that won't give you anything. Particle physics is a dead end, Einstein pointed, listen to the most intelligent person ever lived.
Vietvet
4.6 / 5 (11) Jan 05, 2015
What the heck?

Why isn't "nutrient dependent, pheromone controlled" from "microbes to men" not at the top of the list?
OZGuy
5 / 5 (12) Jan 05, 2015
@vietvet
RealityCheck has Wednesday earmarked for that unless the drinks post-cracking Cold Fusion on Tuesday drag on a bit too long.
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (13) Jan 06, 2015
Hi again, OZGuy. :)
@vietvet
RealityCheck has Wednesday earmarked for that unless the drinks post-cracking Cold Fusion on Tuesday drag on a bit too long.
Just letting you and the forum know that I have no connection or involvement or technical interest in that area. Never have had. So your purile sarcasm is based on a lie. Is that what your 'scientific' and human intellectual capital is spent on every day of your internet trolling life? What a sad waste of brains (assuming you have some). Do better for science and humanity's sake, instead of continuing to make yourself a self-serving 'personality cult' sarcastic lying irrelevance like that, yet again.
OZGuy
5 / 5 (13) Jan 07, 2015
RC
Of course it's sarcasm, if you claim to be the scientific acolyte of the world towering over us mere mortals then sarcasm comes with the territory, you should be used to it by now.

You've claim to have written a Theory of Everything, surely that covers Cold Fusion. No?

If Cold Fusion isn't in your ToE is it because Cold Fusion doesn't occur and you effectively discredit it or is your book a Theory of Some Stuff?

When is your toss book being published?
Maggnus
5 / 5 (10) Jan 07, 2015
RC
Of course it's sarcasm, if you claim to be the scientific acolyte of the world towering over us mere mortals then sarcasm comes with the territory, you should be used to it by now.

You've claim to have written a Theory of Everything, surely that covers Cold Fusion. No?

If Cold Fusion isn't in your ToE is it because Cold Fusion doesn't occur and you effectively discredit it or is your book a Theory of Some Stuff?

When is your toss book being published?


This deserves a 10! The Theory of Some Stuff! Quite apt!
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (13) Jan 07, 2015
Hi OZGuy.

No, I merely told you what I've been/am doing along lines of original thinking/work which will be published complete. :)

The work was necessary since for 100 yrs the 'great minds/systems of mainstream science' has failed to complete the physical reality-based (not just abstractions) theory; and the technological/political progress towards a truly safe/economic/integrated solution for our local/global energy/transportation/environment etc problems.

Otherwise I wouldn't have needed to do all this work over the decades. :)

Meanwhile your/your useless bot-voting troll gang's original and important contribution to significantly advancing either the science or humanity from its current impasse has been...squat.

No, worse than squat...you bring bot-voting, sarcasm, bias etc, based on personal ignorance/malice, to try sabotage/censor otherwise open/free science/humanity discourse.

PS: OZGuy, did you just imply you've cracked 'Cold Fusion' for 'real'? Wow! hehe. :)
gkam
3 / 5 (10) Jan 07, 2015
Let's just hope the year ahead in science is better than the year ahead in politics.
OZGuy
5 / 5 (12) Jan 07, 2015
RC

No I implied as you claim to know EVERYTHING and claimed to have written a Theory of Everything you already have Cold Fusion cracked . I thought that was fairly obvious to anyone with a basic grasp of the english language and an understanding of sarcasm.

I'm not claiming to have cracked anything, you are the leading expert on cracked on this forum.

Sabotage science? What science? All I see in your posts is self-serving statements informing us how brilliant you are and that one day soon you'll illuminate the world with your brilliance. Soon, any day now, well maybe a bit later on but soon very soon, I promise, bah!. We've heard this song for years and it still doesn't play well.

Don't make grandiose claims if you don't want to be ridiculed! Put up or shut up once and for all.
Whydening Gyre
4.6 / 5 (11) Jan 08, 2015
"Theory of Some Stuff" is still crackin" me up..

TOSS (as in - out)
antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (10) Jan 08, 2015
"Personally, working in the HIV vaccine field for 16 years, I have never been so positive,"

OK, that one made me grin.
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (13) Jan 08, 2015
Hi OZGuy. Well well, your reading confirmation bias will out for all to see, as usual. I wrote: "sabotage science DISCOURSE" with your self-evident indiscriminate bot-vote gang and 'personality cult' trolling tactics.

And as usual, you have less-than-nothing original or positive to contribute to ADVANCE the science from current 100-yr-long IMPASSE on the very BIGGEST questions which my complete ToE will answer consistent with reality-based mechanisms/processes which no conventional mainstream maths abstractions 'construct' is capable of ever delivering (else it should have done so after 100yrs, no?).

It is no crime to foreshadow publication of my complete ToE work; which includes gravity and all other fundamental non-abstract aspects and explanations.

You've no clue about its contents, yet presume to prejudge in your ignorance-based confirmation-biased way...how 'brave' and 'enlightened' and 'objective' of you.

Good luck with your self-inflicted biased irrelevance, troll.
TheGhostofOtto1923
3.2 / 5 (9) Jan 08, 2015
Well they DID forget the e-cat and the hydrino reactor, both of which should make major headlines this year.
OZGuy
5 / 5 (10) Jan 08, 2015
RC
Same tune and it's a sad old one, my book will solve ALL the worlds problems, it really really will I promise; I am special, I am brilliant, you are ALL ignorant. Seriously you sound like a 4 yr old reciting that over and over. You'll probably go to your grave muttering the same boring tune.

It's not a toe, it's toss book you look at when you want to play with yourself. Look up Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD), if your posts are truly reflective of your personality then you seriously should be tested for NPD .
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (13) Jan 08, 2015
PS: OZGuy.
WTF??? Here is your sarcasm 'rationale':
I implied as you claim to know EVERYTHING, and claimed to have written a Theory of Everything, you already have Cold Fusion cracked . I thought that was fairly obvious to anyone with a basic grasp of the english language and an understanding of sarcasm.

See the glaring non-sequitur flaw in your 'rationale'?....YOU effectively based your sarcasm on YOUR tacit implication that Cold Fusion is 'real fact'...not me!

My ToE can therefore not make any claims about it either way. See? Only if Cold Fusion was 'real fact' would your sarcasm be valid. But since I am not aware of what YOUR assumption there that Cold Fusion is 'real fact' is based on, then it is unreasonable for you to infer that I or my ToE can have anything to say about YOUR Cold Fusion assumptions on which your sarcasm is based.


OZGuy, do stop your gang-based troll tacics of strawmanning and bot-voting. I's not a good look....self-inflicted irrelevance.
Uncle Ira
4.7 / 5 (14) Jan 08, 2015
It's not a toe, it's toss book you look at when you want to play with yourself. Look up Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD), if your posts are truly reflective of your personality then you seriously should be tested for NPD .


@ Oz-Skippy. Ask him to do the one about how he goes all over the interweb as service to scientists and humans protecting and defending them against the international-gang-bottom-mafia-troll-moderators-blinker-blinders.

That is a really good one. He says he does out of that out of the goodness of his heart and as service to scientists and humans.
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (13) Jan 08, 2015
OZGuy. All your 'personal' comments are based on your assumption that your uninformed prejudgements are correct. They are not; as you will see soon enough. Just because you have failed, along with the rest of mainstream cosmology theorists and mathematical physicists over the last century, to arrive at a complete consistent reality-based GUT, it doesn't necessarily follow that no-one else could. Thinking like that is biased elitist arrogance which mainstreamers in every age and field naturally default to when they have reached the limits of their originality and effectiveness. It is usually the maverick with a novel and groundbreaking unorthodox perspective who comes to the rescue. So it is not beyond the bounds of possibility, is it, that such a maverick and breakthrough work is overdue after 100 yrs of mainstream impasse re finally unifying gravity with everything else consistently from go to whoa in reality-based terms not further self-defeating maths-abstraction?

Patience. :)
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (13) Jan 08, 2015
Poor poor irrelevant Uncle bot. Still mindlessly posting pathetic trolls to delude itself it is in any way relevant to science or humanity discourse here or anywhere else. Poor poor bot-vote gang twerp. Understands neither the orthodoxy nor the alternatives discussed, but still feels itself bot-impelled to pretend to itself and its 'friends' that anyone here gives even a tinkers curse about what it 'couyons' all over the place. Poor poor Uncle twat.
Uncle Ira
4.7 / 5 (14) Jan 08, 2015
@ Really-Skippy how you are Cher? I'm pretty darned good me. I am sorry I do not have the time I used to have to play the "Bye now mate" game with you much lately because of my new radio hobby. Maybe somebody else will play him with you.

Do your diligence with your toes and I can't wait to read it.
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (12) Jan 08, 2015
Poor poor Uncle-bot-vote gang twerp, still insensible and lying as ever. Still making indiscriminate bot-votes and inane trolling posts which even embarrasses his imaginary troll 'friends'. Who gives a 'couyon' about what goes on in your ignorantly malignant shite-filled cranium, you poor poor insensible irrelevant Uncle-bot-vote gang twat.
OZGuy
5 / 5 (13) Jan 08, 2015
Stephen Hawking announcing an upcoming publication that would revolutionise current knowledge would be plausible and generate genuine interest.

A vitriolic troll waving and shouting "I'm releasing a ToE and I'm so special, look at me, look at me" year after year rightfully elicits either "F#ck off nutjob" or a shrug of indifference from most people.

You have to eventually put up or shut up, unfortunately I can't see you doing either.
Captain Stumpy
4.6 / 5 (10) Jan 09, 2015
Good luck with your self-inflicted biased irrelevance
&
See the glaring non-sequitur flaw in your 'rationale'?
!! this is HILARIOUS! http://sci-ence.o...-flags2/
I am trying to get my solutions into 'presentation' shape in time for the next major International Climate Change Conference ...but this GW solutions project has now become too urgent for me to leave it on the backburner any longer in all good conscience. ...The Reality-cavalry is coming to the rescue, whether you like it or not, or believe it or not
i think OZGuy has NAILED it on the head with this comment
Look up Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD)
So now we have a Dunning-Kruger NPD-ToSS ToE to look forward to! I can't wait!
You have to eventually put up or shut up
and that is pretty much the meat of the problem
time after time, when asked to put up, he simply goes into a tirade against troll/mods and argues that he is right or that we are wrong with NO evidence
GOD WORK OZ
Captain Stumpy
4.6 / 5 (10) Jan 09, 2015
You have to eventually put up or shut up, unfortunately I can't see you doing either.
@OZGuy
if you will take special note of his reply to you above... starting with
OZGuy. All your 'personal' comments are based on your assumption...
then you read the whole paragraph with the NPD link (here: https://en.wikipe...disorder ) in your head while reading... you can deconstruct the paragraph and see that you are pretty right on in your assessment!
the links says
People who are diagnosed with a narcissistic personality disorder are characterized by exaggerated feelings of self-importance. They have a sense of entitlement and demonstrate grandiosity in their beliefs and behavior. They have a strong need for admiration, but lack feelings of empathy
and then we read the post
it is not beyond the bounds of possibility, is it, that such a maverick and breakthrough work is overdue after 100 yrs of mainstream impasse
WITH NO MATHS!!!!
Maggnus
5 / 5 (11) Jan 09, 2015
Well they DID forget the e-cat and the hydrino reactor, both of which should make major headlines this year.


Cold fusion is doubtful at best, a sham at worst. Neither of these belong on a list like this, as they have provided very little evidence that they will work.

I hope to be proved wrong about this, but I have been watching and waiting since the 90's and there has been exactly zero progress.

Ira I like your TOES comment, but I think you should be calling it by its proper name - TOSS!
gkam
2.8 / 5 (9) Jan 09, 2015
Ira, do you talk on sort wave? I used to tune in some folk now and then, on a 618T, late in the night in Southeast Asia, to hear another voice in another place. I did not speak back, but had them on background. I also used to listen to the incredibly boring Chinese propaganda, . . mind-numbing.
TheGhostofOtto1923
4.2 / 5 (6) Jan 09, 2015
Well they DID forget the e-cat and the hydrino reactor, both of which should make major headlines this year.


Cold fusion is doubtful at best, a sham at worst. Neither of these belong on a list like this, as they have provided very little evidence that they will work.
Hey - are you following me around??!?!?

If either of them fulfills the claims of rossi or mills then guaranteed they will be major news. And we can expect to hear about it this year.
Maggnus
5 / 5 (7) Jan 09, 2015
Hey - are you following me around??!?!?
Lol you wish!

If either of them fulfills the claims of rossi or mills then guaranteed they will be major news. And we can expect to hear about it this year.
Yea, the problem is they have been saying that exact same thing for years. They are always just a few months away. Like I say, I hope you are right - but I doubt it.
TheGhostofOtto1923
4.2 / 5 (5) Jan 09, 2015
But they haven't been DOING the same thing for years. Both have had significant infusion of capital. Rossi now works for IH, a major energy company. Both have had independent review and confirmation. Rossis first industrial unit has been functioning in a manufacturing production line for months now.
Maggnus
5 / 5 (7) Jan 09, 2015
But they haven't been DOING the same thing for years. Both have had significant infusion of capital. Rossi now works for IH, a major energy company. Both have had independent review and confirmation. Rossis first industrial unit has been functioning in a manufacturing production line for months now.


Interesting declaration, how about a link? Here's one that suggests your optimism may be misplaced:

http://freeenergy...-test-2/
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (12) Jan 09, 2015
Good Morning, OZGuy. :) Mate, just what does it take to get you off that arrogant elitist self-delusional roundabout? Here...

http://blogs.scie...onceive/

...read where mainstream scientist Paul Seinhardt never really believed in the Inflation theory he helped conceive. And...

http://phys.org/n...ray.html

...read about mainstream scientists increasingly recognizing Confirmation Bias insidiously embedded over DECADES in research/assumpions/interpretaions/literature. In this case Gamma Ray Burster field. Recall also that I warned you all for some time now about similar bias embedded in mainstream CMB/Big Bang studies, interpretations/literature/peer review etc for decades (BICEP2 being the latest case in point supporting my caution!).

[continued...]
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (12) Jan 09, 2015
[...continued]

And...

http://phys.org/n...ize.html

http://phys.org/n...vor.html

...read for yourself about the insidious failure potential/inevitability in the present system from training-to-research-to-publish-or-perish stage; which Stephen Hawking and MANY other mainstream hacks/quacks have been indulging in like publicity whores, at the cost of setting back reality (as distinct from 'pop') science understanding/theory by decades, with their lame 'bets' and 'speculations' which 'maths-bedazzled' non-original thinkers and 'religious' believers 'accept' uncritically as 'fact' or 'valid', even though in reality it's all total pop-sci 'crank crap' of the most insidious sort.

[continued...]
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (12) Jan 09, 2015
[...continued]

And finally...

http://phys.org/n...pts.html

...read how a flawed 'peer review' system (and the flawed human beings involved all along the chain of confirmation bias) can not only suppress/delay breakthrough publications, but, and just as bad, also insidiously allow bad science publications into the body of scientific literature which subsequent 'work/assessments' use!

Face it, OZGuy, I have been right all along on all counts; and I have NOT been lying to you about what I have observed/confirmed/cautioned so far; nor about what REALITY-based work I have done/am doing (which will BE published complete as soon as my personal/health/other situational factors allows). So...

Patience. Good luck. Peace, everyone. Until then! :)
OZGuy
5 / 5 (11) Jan 09, 2015
RC
Nice rant, none of which has anything to do with your claims to be an unpublished misunderstood genius about to unleash his brilliance on the world, any day now, very very soon, well soonish.

Hawking has published accredited papers and books not just grandiose rants in forums. I'm sure deep down you believe that Hawking is just a mainstream puppet in a conspiracy to blindside us to your brilliance and steal your thunder. I'm sure once you publish the ToE/GUt/ToSS he'll be so embarrassed at how wrong he was he'll beg your forgiveness.

Ho hum
OZGuy
5 / 5 (13) Jan 09, 2015
RC
PLEASE, publish this amazing tome, revolutionise the world and prove me wrong and I'll get down on my knees to publicly apologise and acknowledge your brilliance.

Uncle Ira
4.4 / 5 (14) Jan 09, 2015
How you are Really-Skippy? I'm good thanks.

as soon as my personal/health/other situational factors allows


Then maybe you should think about not writing all the goofy stuffs you write whenever you get on the interweb.because the doctors taking care of your mental conditions won't ever let you out.

I hope you get better real soon so we can see you doing your diligence and read your toes book about everything.
RealityCheck
1.3 / 5 (12) Jan 10, 2015
Hi OZGuy.
Hawking has published accredited papers and books...
Sure he has, but "accredited" by whom/what? The same 'peer review' and 'professional publish or perish' people/setup that my earlier references prove are FLAWED? If you did read those references, then your cognitive dissonance is astounding if you can come back with such a lame and circuitous rationale/justification for 'believing' that crap. It's not a conspiracy; so much as a FAILING, for the reasons already made clear and proven by all hose references you just read, and more besides. Take off your blinkers, OZGuy, and stop engaging in self-interested bot-vote-gang tacics which mirror exactly the kind of entrenched confirmation bias FAILURES which bedevil the peer review and the flawed 'professionals' exploiting it to post crap science that leads to dead end abstraction/fanrasy maths/speculation and flawed 'basis' for 'passing' future 'work'. You are part of the problem.
[continued...]
OZGuy
5 / 5 (11) Jan 10, 2015
RC
Same as yesterday, WTF does this rant have to do with you rewriting knowledge as we know it... NOTHING! What have you actually written NOTHING and never will.

I am part of the problem? hahahaha Take your meds and go have a good lie down.
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (12) Jan 10, 2015
[...continued]
RC PLEASE, publish this amazing tome, revolutionise the world and prove me wrong and I'll get down on my knees to publicly apologise and acknowledge your brilliance.
When I started as a 9-yr-old on my scrupulously independent, objective, scientific, longterm project to satisfy myself of what the actual physical cosmological reality is, it was to satisfy my own curiosity. Hence I am not subject to all the 'publish or perish' imperatives which drive/lead (see earlier linked references) people like you and most 'professionals' to publish endless incomplete/speculatiive maths/abstractions that for 100 yrs now have still to answer in reality-physical terms what the universal energy-space is and how gravity is effected by mass-energy in surrounding energy-space. So much for 'accredited' publications/literature to date!
[continued...]
Uncle Ira
4.4 / 5 (14) Jan 10, 2015
@ Really-Skippy. How you are Cher? Never mind, I see you are about the same. If you don't do your diligence better they are not going to ever let you out of there. Anyhoo, just wanted to say hello, and hope you get better with your mental condition soon.
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (12) Jan 10, 2015
[...continued]
Anyhow, why impatient, OZGuy? You've waited 100 yrs for professionals to complete the theory, to no avail. You can wait a little longer. And as for how long it has taken me, you must realize that a complete work in such a complex field takes time. Darwin published after decades, and then only because of fear a rival would beat him to it. I have no such qualms, since the professionals have failed and the only ones left that can do the job is 'cranks and mavericks'...like me. Anyhow, what makes you think your entreaties, or offer of prostration before me, figure at all in my work moivation or my publication schedules? I am doing what I want because I want to satisfy my curiosity completely; not to impress/beat pathetic bot-vote-gang trolls on the internet; or the professionals who've failed peer review and science understandings for their own aggrandisement/profit in professional/public status and monetary gain.

Go reread/rethink everything anew. Peace. :)

OZGuy
5 / 5 (12) Jan 10, 2015
RC
No impatience on my part just calling the Bullsh!t you spout for what it is. You keep spouting it and I'll keep calling it.
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (12) Jan 10, 2015
Poor OZGuy, still no clue.
RC Same as yesterday, WTF does this rant have to do with you rewriting knowledge as we know it... NOTHING!...I am part of the problem? hahahaha

My posting over years have given clues to my work. You missed it all because it was like 'pearls before swine' to bot-voting mindless trolls like you/your gang. Now at this late stage you pretend to have any informed or rational basis to make any judgements and prejudicial pronouncements about that which you have no clue about because of your own confirmation baised and trollish FAILURE to listen and recognize? And those earlier references about the failures in the system speak precisely of people/mentalities like yours/your gang 'friends'. It is such types that created the problems for science and humanity, because of your self-inflicted irrelevance, self-serving ego and malignancy of mind.

Poor OZGuy, Uncle Idiot et al, still willfully clueless, lying and malicious failures. Pity.

Bye.
Uncle Ira
4.4 / 5 (14) Jan 10, 2015
Bye.


Are you going to start the Bye foolishment up again? I told you I don't have time for that one much anymore. I got the new hobby me. I got my Amateur Extra Class license while you were away the last time getting your mental condition seen to. I talk with peoples all over the world with the new radio I got for Christmas me.

So see if somebody else can play the bye game with you. I can't right now. You get one more bye from me and then you are on your own.

Keeping doing your diligence better now. Bye Really-Skippy.
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (13) Jan 10, 2015
Hi OZGuy.
No impatience on my part just calling the Bullsh!t you spout for what it is. You keep spouting it and I'll keep calling it.

What will it take, mate, to get you to stop/look at yourself/your behaviour objectively? Maybe this:

See this ratings page...

https://sciencex....k/?v=act

What sort of person/mind makes such patently 'automatic' anti-science/humanity 'rates' based on 'person' list rather than on 'content'?

Do you see the parallels between those kinds of self-interested fools who skew/corrupt this site's rating system for their own ends, and the kind of self-interested fools who've done similarly to 'peer review' etc.

Stop being part of the problem; stop 'running with' such types. :)

OZGuy
5 / 5 (9) Jan 10, 2015
"My posting over years have given clues to my work."

Work? What work? I have yet to read a single post where you cite any work or present any finding..

There are plenty of "I am going to change the world" or "You are too stupid to understand me" posts but there is no work, no science, no discourse, just rants. Lots and lots of rants.

I have patience and a thick skin so go for it rant boy until you finally get yourself banned for abuse.
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (13) Jan 10, 2015
OZGUY, for pity's sake!

Did you see Uncle Ira AUTOMATICALLY bot-downrate me 1 in the techxplore thread, where I posted a possible solution to the hacking vulnerability discussed in the article?

This Ira bot-idiot has neither nouse nor the intention of even discussing before downvoting BASED on the PERSON not the content.

If you missed even that item TODAY, how the hell can you claim to know what I have/have not posted over years that would give clues/hints of my overall work to complete reality-based maths/physics cosmology theory?

If you 'approve' of Ira's antics, you tacitly approve of the very antics which has made 'passing peer review' a mockery of the scientific method, because it is SKEWED and CORRUPTED just like that ratings page has been...by twits like Ira, whose irrelevant personality crap comments YOU still blithely, self-servingly rate '5's!

Stop blindly following the dishonest 'lead' of such morons/gangs. You are better than that, OZ. Good luck. :)
OZGuy
5 / 5 (11) Jan 10, 2015
See this ratings page...

No. I don't look at rating pages as I don't care what ratings I or anyone else gets. Facts are facts whether someone rates them 1 or 5, same applies to bullsh!t. I'm sure people read your posts and rate it based on the content NOT your personality, sweet and bubbly though it is. The content of a post speaks for itself. Do you honestly think if you get all 5's your posts will magically turn from insane rants into pure scientific discourse? Seriously?
You want/crave 5's then write something worthwhile for a change or find a site that better caters to your personality.

self-interested fools who skew/corrupt this site's rating system for their own ends,

What is anyone going to gain from skewing ratings? Who could be bothered? Do you think we all get together after school and plot against you?

Stop being part of the problem

You appear to have so many many serious problems that ratings on phys.org should be way way down on the list.
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (12) Jan 10, 2015
OZ. You're "sure", are you? Based on what? The lies of trolls and your reluctance to actually look at the evidence which would dispel your selectively biased, uninformed 'certainty' about me?

You display the very things 'modern science' has come a cropper over....self-interested agendas, overweening egos; that corrupt even those who are supposed to be above corruption, ie, scientists and scientific peer review system.

Wake up and smell the roses about all that OZ; and about yourself and such as the Uncle Ira dimwits who can rate based on person not content.

You don't believe it? Do you have to be led by the nose to the self-evident? Here...

http://techxplore...ity.html

Uncle Ira, as usual, automatically downrated based on person. Period. Look for yourself and see what my posted suggested solution contained that could possibly rate a '1' without any basis in fact offered.

What price your "sure", OZ?
Maggnus
5 / 5 (6) Jan 10, 2015
It surprises me that Reality Check (aka Really Cretinous) continues to try and push his Theory of Some Stuff (or is it Theory of Plenty of Stuff? Theory Of Slews of Things?) on this site, when there is no one on this site, not one person, who thinks he is anything but a laughing stock. I think he and Water Prophet (aka The Diluent Tear Shedder) might be the same personality type. Sad really, in a pathetic sort of way.

Is Crying Baby Prophylactic still denigrating John Cook with his ludicrous slander? To stupid to realize how stupid he is.
OZGuy
5 / 5 (11) Jan 10, 2015
RC
You sure are fixated on ratings, you know they don't mean a thing. Try going outside and looking at the real world for a while and you might see how unimportant those ratings really are.

You have a problem with a rating I give you then suck it up buttercup because it is what it is.

You have a problem with the ratings other people give you then whine to them, it's not my concern and I have no influence on their opinion of you, THAT is all your own work.

There is no conspiracy, no gang meeting up after school to besmirch your reputation.
RealityCheck
1.3 / 5 (13) Jan 10, 2015
Maggnus. Do yourself and objectivity a favour and actually follow the discussion/evidence linked to earlier, instead of coming in with your preprepared, preconceived 'off the shelf' personal and uninformed remarks which only prove the point made about entrenched confirmation bias and personality cult crap being the 'yardstick' for what 'passes peer review' or not here and the science orthodoxy/literature. Your flaws are symptomatic of the system's flaws. Plenty of evidence/proof has been linked to for those who want to get a real idea of what's been happening. You aren't interested in all that, so you effectively make yourself uninformed and irrelevant. Good luck with that modus operandi in this new year, Maggnus.

Maggnus
5 / 5 (8) Jan 10, 2015
Do yourself and objectivity a favour and actually follow the discussion/evidence linked to earlier, instead of coming in with your preprepared, preconceived 'off the shelf' personal and uninformed remarks blah blah blah


I have been down that rabbit hole with you dumdum, on at least 2 other sites besides this one. You are a laughing stock here and on every other site where you have tried to push your pseudo-scientific meanderings. You have been trying to foist your pretend Theory Of Mostly Nothing for years now, and you are too narcissistic to realize that people that enjoy science read multiple sites. I have seen you banned many times, not because anyone wants to censure you, but because you have no bloody idea what you are talking about. When that becomes obvious due to your own incompetent responses, you lash out with vitriol and denigration.

Grow up.
RealityCheck
1.3 / 5 (12) Jan 10, 2015
OZ, you miss the point. It's not about fixating on ratings (I don't bother to rate and am not fussed what idiot gangs do except that they skew the system).

The point was that peer review, just like rating systems of any kind, are subject to skewing/corruption just like is happening here and in professional review system (go read all the linked PO articles on the people/system flaws allowed to creep into the scientific literature/method/studies/peer review etc).

As for your disingenuous claims you "do not care/follow ratings", it would be more believable if you didn't have the history, there in black and white, showing you DO 'care' to support bot-voter gang members (whether organized or just common idiocy infected as a loose group constituting a 'herd mentality' phenomenon).

You give 5's to irrelevant commentary from Uncle bot-vote Ira et al. You gave me 1's even though the content/references linked to prove me correct.

Pretending you "don't care"? In "denial", OZ?
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (12) Jan 10, 2015
Maggnus. The laughing from mod-troll gangs who've been exposed by experiments and proven to abuse the system is irrelevant to reality, dumdum. But that idiotic/crooked laughter from troll gang morons is apparently what 'counts' in your 'peer review' system, hey dumdum? That's what's gotten professional science peer review and literature into strife; full of irrelevant crap and sometimes suppressing/delaying real breakthrough work. It's insensible selfserving dumdums like you/your gang mates that demonstrate for the forum all too clearly how it is that systems become corrupted: by the process of dumdums 'passing' fellow dumdums crap all along the line. What happens? Embedded confirmation bias; flawed peer review/work being allowed to infest the literature/assumptions/etc then used as basis for further dumdum 'work/passing'. Read these, Maggnus...

http://phys.org/n...ray.html

And the rest.
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (12) Jan 10, 2015
PS: Maggnus, this was the second link. It dropped out when submitted. Here it is...

http://phys.org/n...pts.html

Here are some more you should read, for your objective edification's sake...

http://phys.org/n...ize.html

http://phys.org/n...vor.html

Good luck.
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (12) Jan 10, 2015
PPS: And another link dropped out. Here it is...

http://blogs.scie...onceive/

Read; and rethink everything you have been so "certain" about, Maggnus. Good luck.
Captain Stumpy
4.6 / 5 (9) Jan 11, 2015
Poor OZGuy, still no clue
But, RC_TROLL, you've already admitted you've done absolutely NO publishing (except that absolutely AWFUL web page you had)... you say it above! and you even started when you were 9!
When I started as a 9-yr-old
you also stated that there are NO maths!
What sort of person/mind makes such patently 'automatic' anti-science/humanity 'rates'?
and you've not added any content above either, so there is no reason to be upset at all the 1star votes,

you've not added to the conversation, but TROLLED it

don't bother to answer
I won't read it and i know it will simply be whining about being downvoted blah blah blah everyone picks on you blah blah conspiracy MOD gangs blah blah blah blatantly lying blah blah blah more trolling blah blah links to rating attempting to elicit sympathy ROTFLMFAO

http://sci-ence.o...-flags2/

just like all the rest of your posts, i am reporting you
Maggnus
4.4 / 5 (7) Jan 11, 2015
Hey stumpy that is a great link! Thanks!
Captain Stumpy
4.4 / 5 (7) Jan 11, 2015
Grow up.
@Maggnus
the funniest thing i have seen to date is this part
mod-troll gangs who've been exposed by experiments
The mods actually broke down and felt sorry for the troll so gave him another chance
i will give you three guesses what happened (the first two don't count, either)!
Yup

he started doing the same baiting/trolling on Sciforums he was originally banned for
and i even took a hit refuting the idiot!

but eventually he could not help himself... he got banned,,,then he tried and tried and tried to get back on using a bunch of different sock-puppets

they caught every one and deleted them
THAT is what he is saying is his "experiment"
his sad excuse sock-puppet attempts to get back into Sciforums

he tried to get back into Sapo's page too

best thing that ever happened to the site, too!
LMFAO

RC=crackpot delusional troll with Dunning Kruger and NPD
http://sci-ence.o...-flags2/
http://math.ucr.e...pot.html
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (12) Jan 11, 2015
How many times does this idiot Stump have to be told: I do not suffer from the monetary/selfish/distorting imperatives of 'publish or perish' like the professionals have been? My publication will be whole and complete, finished, not like the flawed discussion papers and speculations infesting the mainstream offerings/literature while the main fundamental reality-based explanations seem beyond their maths abstractions and sci-fi fantasies in lieu of real answers.

If poor Stump could stem the flow of his voluminous (count 'em across the forums for the last few months, guys!) output of irrelevant unoriginal driveling personal posts here and elsewhere long enough for him to actually read the links I posted and think objectively, then maybe his posts would have something more than his idiot wind to contribute to science and humanity discourse.

Poor useless irrelevant Stump. Self-inflicted lying idiocy and malignancy of mind and action here is too pitiful to laugh at. Poor Stump.
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (12) Jan 11, 2015
Poor Stump. He doesn't tell you that the same mod-troll gang just continued to abuse the system for their own amusement/agenda/ego-tripping. So I again proved by further experiment their further abuses. Naturally they trolled, framed and banned the messenger who proved their corrupt anti-science anti-free-discourse behaviour for all to see. So much for 'reporter' Stump's 'objective' view of things, hey folks? His confirmation bias and malignancy bent seems to be the 'perfect storm' of what has gone wrong in science and humanity discourse/sites over recent decades.

Poor self-deluded lying hypocritical Stump. He'll swap irrelevant humorous links with fellow trolls, but doesn't read the relevant on-topic links I provided which prove him wrong and lying stupid. Twas ever thus.
Maggnus
5 / 5 (7) Jan 11, 2015
blah blah My publication will be whole and complete, finished, not like the flawed discussion papers and speculations infesting the mainstream offerings/literature blah blah
The TOSS. Or is it TOPS? Probably more like TOMN!

You're a laughable gascon. Nothing more.
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (11) Jan 11, 2015
Maggnus. Your irrelevant juvenile play on acronyms is just about your level of capability. And you know nothing about what is pending that makes you look like an ignorant child twiddling his funny looking thumbs while the grownups get on with it. Good luck with your twiddling, Maggnus, because that's about all you have to offer real original science efforts/discourse. Pity.
OZGuy
5 / 5 (8) Jan 11, 2015
RC
You say you don't care about ratings but you sure as hell refer to them often enough to make that claim doubtful.

So apparently you've been banned on other forums, well I haven't encountered you elsewhere (thankfully) but it appears you are just as endearing elsewhere as you are here. If I was in "the gang" I'd already know about your history but there IS NO GANG except in your paranoia. I find it disturbing enough to read your tripe once, the thought of wanting to discuss it with others is beyond belief.

And you know nothing about what is pending

All that is pending from you is more vitriolic rants and grandiose BS claims that amount to nothing more than mental masturbation. This is your entire repertoire and I suspect the full extent of any of your future writings.
TechnoCreed
5 / 5 (8) Jan 11, 2015
RealityCheck 1 / 5 (3) 1 hour ago
Comment posted by a person you have ignored ... show comment

Thanks to the 'bug spray' button, it as been a while since I had to read your nausiating comments. The problem here is that there are close to 30 of your impertinent comments under this article alone. That makes this collumn unappealing to other posters and makes Phys.org a very boring place. Please give us a break.
TechnoCreed
5 / 5 (10) Jan 11, 2015
Another interesting experiment to follow this year will be the commissioning of the Wendelstein 7-x stellator. It is just a small step toward fusion energy production but, in physics, every small steps counts forever. https://www.ipp.m...6900/w7x
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (11) Jan 11, 2015
TechnoCreed. The Forum will note that most of those replies are to trolls' lying posts in denial of the linked evidence which proves they are in denial and just keep attacking the messenger and skewing the rating system with their bot-vote-gang block voting '1' based on the person rather than content. If you only see what you want to see, and only think what you want to think, because of confirmation bias, then you are part of the problem which the linked references are talking about.

Don't be just another self-satisfied biased elitist failure in science and humanity, mate. Actually read ALL the evidence presented by all 'sides'; don't believe the 'framed' and 'edited' version being fed to you by the trolls who gang up based on the person not the objective facts. It is malignant minds like those that have corrupted the mainstream peer review system and many of the scientists themselves who 'go along' with it out of selfish self interest against all true science method and humanity.
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (11) Jan 11, 2015
Hi OZGuy. What does it take? I do not indulge in rating game like you and 'the gang' of bot-voting irrelevants skewing and corrupting the raison d'etre for such systems. Just like the peer review systems have been skewed and corrupted (as those linked PO articles keep trying to get through to you is the reality).

It is you and that 'gang' that 'goose each other' with 5's even for the most inane comments and lying drivel imaginable!....while a the same time you all AUTOMATICALLY bot-vote as a 'gang' giving 1's based on person not content posted (as I pointed out again for your benefit just above...are you denying that too in order to come back with more self-serving twisting of facts?).

OZ, face it like a man; you have become part of the problem and can't extricate yourself from the 'in denial' elitist mire you have fallen into so willingly because of EGO and self-interest, which has led you to jetison all good science and humanity ethics; as demonstrated daily so far. Do better.
Captain Stumpy
4.6 / 5 (9) Jan 11, 2015
Another interesting experiment to follow this year will be the commissioning of the Wendelstein 7-x stellator. It is just a small step toward fusion energy production but, in physics, every small steps counts forever. https://www.ipp.m...6900/w7x
@Techno
COOL
thanks for that link
that should be interesting to watch! i hope they are documenting it (kinda like the Higgs- which i still haven't seen yet but want to)
Thanks to the 'bug spray' button, it as been a while since I had to read your nausiating comments
i will be insanely happy when i no longer have to collect his diatribes for this study... although it does give a little pleasure laughing at the ridiculous claims, he is entirely too repetitious...
at least jvk keeps changing it up and making it more personal and interesting
LMFAO

thanks for that link!!
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (11) Jan 11, 2015
Poor Stump, self-appointed flawed-orthodoxy parroter and official cheerleader to the troll-ocracy across the net. Still in lying hypocrite and evidence denialist mode as ever he was. What a malignant maroon. What a sad sad Stump, hey folks? Pity.
Uncle Ira
4.5 / 5 (15) Jan 11, 2015
Do better.


Hooyeei! You are the funny guy Cher. At least you have the sense of humor.

@ Everybody. This is one of those not really interesting articles even before Really-Skippy showed up. You won't miss anything if you just start Skippy-skipping over this one from here on out. All you going to see is more of Really-Skippy writing a bunch of weird stuffs and peoples making the fun of him.

I mean you can come watch it if want too, but you won't really miss anything if you stop after reading the article and move over to next one.
TechnoCreed
5 / 5 (8) Jan 11, 2015
@OZGuy
So apparently you've been banned on other forums, well I haven't encountered you elsewhere (thankfully)
I might be mistaking but, aren't you both Australian? If it is the case then check that out; he must be known as the only Aussie born without a sense of humour.
TechnoCreed
5 / 5 (7) Jan 11, 2015
Do better.

Hooyeei! You are the funny guy Cher. At least you have the sense of humor.

@RC
Do not get over exited over that. Ira do not disprove wath I said: I will add that everything is funny for a Cajun.
@Vieux Ira
That was a funny coincidence ;-)
Uncle Ira
4.4 / 5 (13) Jan 11, 2015
Do better.

Hooyeei! You are the funny guy Cher. At least you have the sense of humor.

@RC
Do not get over exited over that. Ira do not disprove wath I said: I will add that everything is funny for a Cajun.
@Vieux Ira
That was a funny coincidence ;-)


Non problem with me Techno-Skippy. When it comes to Really-Skippy everything is funny. Ask him to do the one about defending the scientists and humans from the Ira-Skippy. That's a good one.

He thinks that the comment place on physorg is for real scientist-Skippys to do real science stuffs and the real scientist-Skippys come here so Really-Skippy can tell them which papers they wrote was wrong. Or the real scientist-Skippys come here hoping Really-Skippy might give a hint or two to get them going in the right direction.

He is funny couyon. As long as he litters up the boring articles and doesn't get in the way of the good ones.
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (11) Jan 11, 2015
@TechnoCreed. So your excuse for having no valid original contribution to make to advancing valid science is that you have a trolls sense of humour and nothing original to bring to the discourse? The Scientific Method is not for fools, trolls and clowns with 'sense of humour" who go about skewing and corrupting science assessment/discourse instead of being scrupulously fair and objective based on content/facts not 'person/source. Funny guys are a dime a dozen, but serious and objective scientific minds are apparently 'taboo' among you lot and hose that fail the objectivity test when doing their poor-but-funny 'work' and 'peer reviewing'. Mate, one's sense of humour runs out after a few years of being rolled and lied about by morons like you and the rest of 'the gang' of bot-voting 'funny twas' making themselves only too obvious here...

https://sciencex....k/?v=act

Exchange your biased 'sense of humour' for scientific integrity, else what good are you?
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (11) Jan 11, 2015
PS: Forum, you can see what happens to those poor poor sods who have nothing but a sense of humour and malignantly mean little intellects. They form 'gangs' of bot-voting trolls pretending they are relevant to anything at all in science and humanity discourse. See them parading their irrelevance and confirmation biased malignancy here...

https://sciencex....k/?v=act

No wonder why modern science is bedeviled by failures due to self-interested twats skewing/corrupting measures/systems determining what should be passed and what should not, based on evidence, not ganglike abuses like that demonstrated all too clearly for all to see for themselves.

All those earlier linked PO articles highlighting/proving those very same problems are affecting the content and assumptions of 'passed peer review' literature/studies are still being ignored by above trolls and replaced by lame 'sense of humour' rationales for their denying the evidence presented. Poor sods.
Uncle Ira
4.4 / 5 (13) Jan 11, 2015
@ Really-Skippy. How you are Cher? That's one of those rhetoric questions, we can see how you are and you are just like you always were. You should try the smile and the laugh from time to time. It beats being sad and grumpy all the time. And you might live longer and better too.
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (11) Jan 11, 2015
Poor insensible Uncle twat. Pretending that smiles and laughter would have prevented his idiotic discussion/ratings corrupting lying antics here based on personality cult biased rating/trolling. You know, folks, that the 'programming' has passed its use-by-date when this idiot bot Uncle pretends that others don't have a sense of humour! The poor sod doesn't twig that it requires intelligence and objectivity to advance science/discourse as well as a human sense of humour. Unfortunately these troll-gangmember types' 'sense of humour' is even poorer and meaner than their collective 'herd mentality' IQ. Poor poor irrelevant unfunny sods. You just gotta laugh, even as you pity them; else you'd cry at such malignant moronicity in bot-vote-troll-gang form! :)
Uncle Ira
4.4 / 5 (13) Jan 11, 2015
@ Really-Skippy. I told only one "apology accepted" for the whole year. You used him up day before yesterday. This one was wasted because you have to wait until next year to get another one.
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (11) Jan 11, 2015
Poor poor irrelevant unfunny Uncle twat. Still deluding itself its worn-out lame attempts at 'humour' are anything but bot-voter-programmed 'humour' at is lamest. Must be all those foil pointy hats he has been making and been forced to wear by his keeper. Poor insensible unfunny sod. You just gotta laugh or you'll cry to see such lameness of 'bot-intellect' as well as 'bot-humour'. Pitiable.
Uncle Ira
4.3 / 5 (12) Jan 11, 2015
Pitiable.


Thanks for your concern Really-Skippy but everything is good with me. Non, don't worry so much for me Cher. I am the happy one with a fine life. I am glad to be me and not to be you. If I was as miserable as you are all the time I would try to find a stout rope and a tall tree to climb.

Now unless you have something extra silly to say, I'm going to go play with my radio that Santa Claus brought for me for Christmas. (Don't worry though, I'll turn on the automatic-voting-mod-bot-gangster-bad-karma-mafia thing on my computer so you won't feel completely left out.)

So carry on with your defending the scientists and humans so they get their diligence done. We sure are grateful for you doing that for all the scientists and human.
OZGuy
5 / 5 (8) Jan 11, 2015
RC
Off the meds again rant boy.You really don['t get out among real people often do you.

OK are we sitting comfortably? Then lets begin.

Mummy might think EVERYTHING you do is special and ooh and ooh over it and it seems like you went to a school where every child won a ribbon in every event even for last place.

Unfortunately for you here in the real world winners get the ribbons losers get NOTHING and that's what you are RC NOTHING. Hawking et al are winners, they didn't spend years saying "I'm gunna, I'm gunna" they just did it! The BIG difference is that they could do it, you can't.

Hawking could probably even beat you in the 100 yard dash (without his chair), you'd spend all the time whining it wasn't fair rather and the rules were skewed etc etc rather than start running. Once the race was decided you'd rant and stomp your tiny widdle feet until mummy took you home where you could fantasise about what you'd do to all the bad people who stopped you winning.
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (10) Jan 11, 2015
Poor poor Uncle twat. It and its 'friend' the Stump said they both worked on barges and tugs on the Ohio-Mississippi Rivers. Lucky the tug/barge captain fortunate enough to have such dead-weight-mentality lumps on board when the sonar depth-sounding system went on he blink. These two lumps were perfect to be attached to a rope and thrown over the side like the old-fashioned sounding lines....only instead of lumps of Iron and Lead, it was Dumb and Dumber doing the dead-weight-drop to the bottom. These dense dead-heads must have been very useful for that at least! Again and again, until the sonar was up and running again. You gotta laugh when you see these lumps out of heir depth here, or you'd have to cry, watching with pity as they sink again and again, deeper and deeper into the slimy troll depths of their self-inflicted inanity and irrelevance. Poor lying hypocritical useless unfunny lumps. Who'd want to be them or anything like them and their 'friends', anyway? Ugh. Eeeww.
TechnoCreed
5 / 5 (8) Jan 11, 2015
@RC
From now on,
... show comment
is an option that I will defenitely avoid in your case. http://www.psycho...-sadists
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (10) Jan 11, 2015
TechnoCreed. Who cares what a confirmation biased, willfully uninformed, self-interested egotistic bot-voting gangmember does or thinks...until he stops being such, for science and humanity's sake if not for their own erstwhile integrity's sake? Good luck, good thinking and fair unbiased and all-the-facts reading, mate!

Meanwhile, did you read my earlier links which give the fuller context/facts and prove my observations correct yet?
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (10) Jan 11, 2015
OZGuy. Winners have been known to CHEAT. Frauds have been declared 'winners' until they are found out and exposed by braver and more objective minds than yours. What does it take? Have you read ANY of the earlier linked articles which give the fuller context/facts and prove my observations correct yet? And the only time you will ever have any basis for declaring me either winner or loser is when you have all the facts; which will only be when I publish complete work. Until then all your side-line personal crap is irrelevant to both science and humanity in this case. Stop trying to avoid facing the patent truth as per those PO articles, OZ. Do better. Else you and your confirmation biased, selective 'information base' and just plain childish taunts will be ever as irrelevant as they have been to date on this. Good luck.
OZGuy
5 / 5 (9) Jan 11, 2015
RC
What observations?, Rants are NOT observations just rants.

You really should change your name to RantBoy or Gunna, definitely suit you better. Well you better get back to changing the universe, one rant at a time.

"when I publish complete work", hahahahaha that's a good one Gunna!
OZGuy
4.6 / 5 (10) Jan 11, 2015
@Tecno

Gunna lives in his own mystical world not among us puny humans, a physical location matters naught to such a mighty intellect. bwahahaha
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (11) Jan 11, 2015
OZ, mate, are you for real? Or is your demonstrably uninformed position a trolling ploy? :)

In March last year I was the first here to observe that there were many flaws 'built in from the start' into the BICEP2 'paper/work/assumptions/methodology' exercise and resulting/reported interpretations/conclusions. I categorized the flaws, and cautioned this forum (especially those gullible uncritical 'experts' here treating/believing the BICEP2 'findings' as 'fact' because they were so eager to bash cranks with it). Soon many brave mainstream scientists also observed that BICEP2 was flawed due to confirmation biased assumptions and methodology etc. It was nothing more than a 'publish or perish' exercise that came a cropper because I and brave mainstreamers could see the sad failures of science/review therein. I cautioned that all CMB etc 'studies' have for decades been perpetuating flawed 'work/assumptions' into the literature due to prior culture/peer review failures.
[cont...]
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (11) Jan 11, 2015
[...cont]
I later gave you links to mainstream science observations about same/similar problem I cauioned about then and all along for years.

Did you read my earlier linked interview wherein Paul Steinhardt admitted his longstanding reservations about Inflation/Big Bang theories (which he helped conceive in the first place!)? These confirm my longstanding observations/cautions which you are apparently oblivious of. Also did you read the linked article admitting the confirmation bias 'built into' Gamma Ray Buster 'studies' for decades?...just as I have been cautioning had been occuring in overall CMB/Big Bang 'studies' for decades that 'passed peer review' because of similar insidious confirmation bias built into he peer review scientist/system working assumptions/literature used to accept/reject?
[cont...]
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (11) Jan 11, 2015
[...cont]
So, OZ, mate, if you are not fully acquainted with ALL the facts from ALL quarters, from myself and mainstream alike, then what makes you think you have any rational objecive factual basis for making ANY judgements and claims about me or any of my observaions across the net across the years, which have been more lately been increasingly proved spot on?

Stop being biased based and in uninformed state, mate. Either do the necessary FULL objecive research or just wait until you see all my work published in full. Good luck. Patience. Bye.
OZGuy
5 / 5 (8) Jan 11, 2015
RC
You aren't publishing anything but rants, never have never will. Which International Climate
Change Conference do you plan to be presenting at this year?

If it's Vancouver Canada the current submission deadline is 13 January 2015, are you gunna make it in time or are you holding out for Paris in November? Face it, you're not presenting anything to anyone anywhere, anytime, ever.

Patience? Bah I've no patience for fools and gunnas.
Captain Stumpy
4.5 / 5 (8) Jan 12, 2015
Who cares what ...does or thinks.
@rc
if you don't care, why do you keep going on about it?
you seem mighty obsessed for someone who doesn't care... someone who doesn't care would click the ignore button and be done with it, never replying, but you always have to have the last word, regardless...

i know how you can have the last word and make an actual contribution to the thread
you stated
I am trying to get my solutions into 'presentation' shape in time for the next major International Climate Change Conference
please clarify which conference:
this one?
http://en.wikiped...e_Change
or this one?
http://en.wikiped...cipation

or are you referring to another one we don't know about which is held in secret?

please tell us so we don't record the wrong one!
this is, after all, a groundbreaking moment
Whydening Gyre
5 / 5 (8) Jan 12, 2015
PS: Forum, you can see what happens to those poor poor sods who have nothing but a sense of humour and malignantly mean little intellects.

Hey! I resemble that remark!
However, I do not partake in down voting - of anyone.
I only up vote or don't vote a comment based on my own personal criteria.

And - twats?!? Be careful or Benni will call you a foul mouthed retired old codger....
I also note that you use the word "insidious" a lot... Like - Darth Vader insidious?
Captain Stumpy
4.5 / 5 (8) Jan 12, 2015
i have to reply to THIS one
self-appointed flawed-orthodoxy parroter and official cheerleader to the troll-ocracy across the net
@rc
hadn't you heard?
i've been knighted for pointing out the trolls like you for those who are scientifically illiterate...
i am not self appointed, but on a mission from the Crown

there are people who are wrong in the interwebz and i've been assigned mission impossible
#193Penguin-ALPHAhead, subset Earthling, special circumstance authorization RIADA1
to insure the safe, accurate clinical promotion of actual science and to point out people who claim to have scientific knowledge but never produce anything supporting those conclusions, like you, rc

that is how we got your real name, address and pictures of your location as well as downloaded tracking software into your clothing and other personal effects...
we've also invaded your food with micro-bot transmitters to track your consumption

i am SIR Captain now
mooster75
4.2 / 5 (6) Jan 12, 2015
At this point, these comments border on making fun of the mentally disabled. I thought he was a troll, not actually whack.
OZGuy
5 / 5 (9) Jan 12, 2015
@mooster75
Over 18 regularly posting vitriolic and/or grandiose rants on a public forum and apparently multiple forums, he is a troll NOT a poor misjudged soul that needs tender handling.

He knows exactly what he's doing, no need to feel sorry for him.
Whydening Gyre
5 / 5 (8) Jan 12, 2015
I am SIR Captain now


(Saluting)
Can I be King this year?

Mooster,
At this point, these comments border on making fun of the mentally disabled. I thought he was a troll, not actually whack.


And now you know....
Enlightenment is so..... enlightening...:-)
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (9) Jan 12, 2015
OZ. You lot prove my point every day you post ego-tripping rationalizations blaming the messenger in order to avoid acknowledging the earlier linked PO articles showing I was right. Thanks! Now, OZ, how about dropping your uninformed confirmation based rants and actually do what proper scientists do: look at evidence as it presents, instead of "doing a BICEP"...a phrase coined specially for you bot-vote gang 'brains trust'. :)

Were you part of that BICEP2 'team'? You've the 'qualifications'...self-interested biases and missing/misrepresenting important data).

Genuine fair readers of this forum note that OZGuy et al still haven't acknowledged the points raised in earlier linked PO articles re decades of 'mainstream science' fails in training/ethics, research, peer review etc. And they call me troll? :)

OZ, if you trolls are what 'passes' for 'scientists' & 'mainstream thinkers' in cosmology today, then no wonder BICEP2 fiasco happened so easily! Pitiable.

We done? Good. Bye.
Maggnus
4.4 / 5 (7) Jan 12, 2015
Good. Bye.
Again? How many times must you say "good bye" before you actually leave? Gotta be, what, 30 now? More?

Strange little man you are.
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (9) Jan 12, 2015
Maggnus, look to yourself and your fellow trolls. I merely responded to your/their evading, lying, hypocritical and just plain malignant minds attacks on the messenger instead of acknowledging the earlier linked PO articles which prove my point/observations over decades.

That you again posted the above 'attack the messenger while evading the points proven' demonstrates clearly you are he 'strange little man' along with your 'strange little man' fellow sad case bot-vote-gang members who still have not addressed the points which prove me correct. So what price your continuing uninformed and personally biased cheap shots, big brave troll? Those linked PO articles have been describing exactly your kind of self-interested corruption of what should have remained a fair and objective scientific method/review practice/system. How can you not see that even now, after all the linked PO articles discussing that very problem in modern science/literature? Amazing blinkers you have, grandma! :)
Maggnus
4.4 / 5 (7) Jan 12, 2015
You forgot to say "good bye" again.
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (9) Jan 12, 2015
Maggnus, I come back in as necessary to respond. It's the polite thing to do. You lot, in your self-created troll-fug miasma in the mind, have yet to twig that each such troll attack is a fresh opportunity for me to readily demonstrate how biased and malignant you are being while still evading the points placed squarely under your long lying nose by those earlier linked PO articles.

You apparently haven't twigged that you have lost because you are the ones who are STILL trolling the messenger with all sorts of irrelevant crap, while you IGNORE and EVADE addressing the points made in those earlier linked PO articles. That is what trolls do. So you are using nonsense rationalizations to cover your fear of the evidence which proved me correct. Poor things; in more ways than one.

We done? Good. Bye...unless I have to come back in to respond to more of the inanity you/other tragic trolls keep 'offering' in lieu of actually addressing those links/points made by me already. :)
OZGuy
4.9 / 5 (7) Jan 12, 2015
RC
So you are using nonsense rationalizations to cover your fear of the evidence which proved me correct

Yeah I'm trembling as I type at the thought of confronting your evidence, where is it by the way as we still haven't seen it,? I'm sure it'll be here soon, very soon, well soonish.... Remind me WHICH topic is this evidence supposed to cover as you've claimed so many brilliant accomplishments it's hard to keep track.

I am trying to get my solutions into 'presentation' shape in time for the next major International Climate Change Conference

Sorry I missed reading where you informed us which conference you are attending to present your world changing solutions, can you tell us again please.

Vancouver has closed for registration of papers, so is it Paris? It starts in November so remember to pack winter woolies.
OZGuy
5 / 5 (7) Jan 12, 2015
A brief interruption.

For American readers of this gripping drama; when RC mentions blinkers he is referring to what you call blinders.

RC
Quick Tip: When you present your climate paper remember it is for an international audience, use internationally accepted terms or add a list of defined words as an appendix.

OK, back to the story.
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (10) Jan 12, 2015
OZ, did you read my earlier links above?

If you had, you'd read Paul Steinhardt (who helped conceive "Inflation" etc theory) admitting he doesn't really believed in it.

If you had, you would have read PO higlighting mainstream personal/training/practice/peer review failures.

If you had, you'd have read about confirmation bias inbuilt over decades into 'studies' of Gamma Ray Bursters.

If you had read original PO threads re initial BICEP2 'study/claims' in March last year, you would have seen where I observed/cautioned the very same kind of failures/confirmation bias in CMB/BBang 'studies/assumptions/results which that Gamma Ray Burster article pointed out.

But you address none of it.

As for your issues with my withdrawing from further discussing my work (due to pending publication of decades long project to complete GUT/ToE in reality terms, including gravity from the get-go consistently), that's your problem not mine.

As for the rest, wait and see. We done? :)
OZGuy
5 / 5 (8) Jan 13, 2015
Sorry, which international climate conference are you presenting at? Is it going to be Paris?

I want to download the paper once the conference has reviewed and published it seeing it's "THE GW solution". Can't wait to read it and breathe easier knowing that GW will be resolved once and for all.

You really should send Tuvalu an advance copy as they are sh!tting themselves as their islands go under and they'll be relieved (no pun intended) that you're going to save them.

They'll vote you a 5 I reckon, least they could do given you're saving the world.
Whydening Gyre
5 / 5 (8) Jan 13, 2015
A brief interruption.

For American readers of this gripping drama; when RC mentions blinkers he is referring to what you call blinders.

RC
Quick Tip: When you present your climate paper remember it is for an international audience, use internationally accepted terms or add a list of defined words as an appendix.

OK, back to the story.

Actually, OZ, that was a very clever intermission that gave me time to go take a leak...
Which reminded me... Is TED considering extending a speaking invitation to RC any time soon?
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (10) Jan 13, 2015
OZ, Whyde, it's not about me, it's about work towards original, realistic effective solutions in the field of human activity and scientific understanding, especially in areas of sustainable environment and cosmology GUT/ToE completion. I am but one person working on said BIG problems/solutions, and results will speak for themselves.

Meanwhile, can you tell the forum something about YOUR own efforts (if any) towards original, realistic effective solutions in those areas. Just a general synopsis of your work/results will suffice, unless you too are about to publish and don't want to risk being plagiarized?

Also it would help your credibility and give your cynical/sarcastic diversions more 'bite' if you actually addressed all the points made in those PO articles which confirm the accuracy of my own observations over the years. I linked those articles for your attention earlier in this thread, but you are persistently silent and reticent to address them objectively.

Thanks. Bye.
OZGuy
5 / 5 (6) Jan 13, 2015
I've never stated I'd written a ToE/GUT/ToSS nor that I've authored a paper to be presented at an International Climate Conference with the solution to global warming. You have made both these claims and now you need to put up or shut up. So again, which International Climate Conference?

I'm not addressing ANYTHING you write until i read your book and paper. Why should I waste my time on mere chatter when there are such prestigious writings to be absorbed and admired.
The Reality-cavalry is coming to the rescue, whether you like it or not, or believe it or not

Have you considered the movie rights for your book? Probably there should be a documentary on your paper too seeing it's "THE GW solution". This would allow more people to see the true you. I vote for Johnny Depp to play you (think Tonto not Captain Jack) with Jim Carey as the understudy (think Dumb and Dumber not Truman).

Now we just need a title... thoughts anyone? Remember "Liar Liar" has already been used.
Uncle Ira
4.3 / 5 (11) Jan 13, 2015
Now we just need a title... thoughts anyone? Remember "Liar Liar" has already been used.


"The Return of Forrest Gump"? Or how about "The Son of Walter Mitty"?
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (10) Jan 14, 2015
OZ. No-one said you did state that. Seriously, have you done anything by way of big efforts/results for original real solutions in those two big problem areas? Some have, and are doing so. And mine will be published complete soon enough. That should be "put-up-or-shut-up" enough for any reasonable intellect.

You dismiss these as "mere chatter"?!...
http://blogs.scie...onceive/

Mate, did you also think BICEP2 fiasco & subsequent discussion was 'mere chatter" to be ignored?

OZ, you insult the forum's intelligence with denial, bias & trolling me. You fail to even recognize, let alone address, important issues. Good luck.
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (10) Jan 14, 2015
Maggnus
5 / 5 (7) Jan 14, 2015
Hey, I thought you said good bye? In fact, I think you said: Good. Bye. I'm saddened, I thought for sure that meant you were going away. From the other comments, I thought you were maybe going away to talk to everyone about your TOMN theory. Shouldn't you be busy getting that ready? Look above, Ozguy is positively dying to hear/read/see it!

You should get to work, we don't want to be disappointed!
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (10) Jan 14, 2015
Maggnus, my previous posts to OZ apply equally to you. I am working on it all; and am publishing it all soon enough. You, OZ, et al trolls, on the other hand, are doing what, exactly? Oh, that's right: failing even to recognize and address the important issues raised, and serious failures highlighted, in the linked refs above.

It is the facing/correcting of precisely those issues/problems in science/peer review/studies in CMB/BBang/Peer-review etc that will determine the success/failure of Cosmology Theory etc in the NEW "Year Ahead in Science" which is the topic of THIS thread/article.

I come in as necessary, remember? No, probably not, since you only 'remember/make up' whatever trolls you like, while ignoring the on-topic refs and issues which matter infinitely more than your lame trolls do.

We done now? Good. Bye...unless you have more inane irrelevances to offer the forum in lieu of actually recognizing and addressing the important-for-science-and-humanity issues raised?
OZGuy
5 / 5 (7) Jan 14, 2015
RC
Which International Climate Conference?

OZGuy
5 / 5 (7) Jan 15, 2015
RC
Which International Climate Conference?
Enele Sopoaga is waiting to hear when "THE GW solution" will be released so can he spread the good news to his people.

I come in as necessary, remember?

You come here, post grandiose claims, post vitriolic rants when challenged to prove those claims, then disappear for a while when you realise people aren't going to let you off the hook. After a while you creep back in here with a "Hi Everyone" and pretend you never posted either the grandiose claims or the vitriolic rants.
You're a JOKE.

I ask yet again, at which International Climate Conference are you presenting "THE GW solution"?
OZGuy
5 / 5 (8) Jan 16, 2015
WG
A TED?, Probably but the man needs to get to Paris( assuming it's this ICC) remember, lets not get too much on his agenda. Besides he needs to get the movie rights sorted first before releasing spoilers.
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (10) Jan 16, 2015
OZ, take a hard look at yourself and your motives/actions. You still haven't recognized/addressed that which I linked above. Why?...to troll the person with your own willful biased uninformed opinions formed from other trolls' lies and missing all I posted over the years which prove you ignorant of both me and my work.

I 'disappear' because I am busy with work in these two areas. My publishing will happen when complete and ready. Environmental solutions project was put on back burner for a decade while I concentrated on my reality-based maths-physics COMPLETE GUT/ToE ready for publication. But increasing urgency, highlighted by our nitwit PM Tony Abbot and his 'clown posse' sabotaging our country's efforts, decided me to bring my environmental/climate change work/solutions to the front burner. It will be published, and presented to whichever meeting is upcoming then.

What efforts/solutions have you contributed to science and humanity in these two areas, OZ? Trolling.
OZGuy
5 / 5 (7) Jan 16, 2015
RC
It will be published, and presented to whichever meeting is upcoming then.


So no paper, no International Climate Conference, SURPRISE SURPRISE.

You talk big, make lots of promises but NEVER deliver, there's no ToE, no GUT just you talking through your arse as usual.

Do yourself a favour mate, stop big noting yourself on here that you are changing the world, you're nothing but a charlatan and a liar!

I am trying to get my solutions into 'presentation' shape in time for the next major International Climate Change Conference ...but this GW solutions project has now become too urgent for me to leave it on the backburner any longer in all good conscience. ...The Reality-cavalry is coming to the rescue, whether you like it or not, or believe it or not.


No you're not and we don't believe you and never will! Liar!
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (8) Jan 16, 2015
OZ, have it your way, mate. :)

You continue to fail to recognize facts/links and info which may inform you before you make uninformed opinions and trolls based on your willful ignorance of all the relevant facts/posts which prove you mistaken/biased.

You make unreasonable accusations/demands, knowing full well I can't say any more until published.

You demure when asked to give some general indication of your own efforts/contributions (IF ANY) in these two areas, while deriding others who have/are some to offer/publish.

So what use are you, mate? Nada. Irrelevant troll wasting time and site bandwidth on negativity and personal trolls when you should be using whatever intellect you have more positively/productively for advancement of science and humanity.

Convince yourself and your fellow trolls of whatever you want, OZ; just like Climate Change deniers and Religionist con-men do. Poor show, OZ. You bring shame and dismay to all decent intelligent fair minded Aussies. :(
OZGuy
5 / 5 (7) Jan 16, 2015
RC
YOU claim to have written a ToE, YOU claim to have the GW solution and will be presenting it at the ICC

Asking me to state what I have contributed is a simply trying to deflect the attention away from your lies.But OK then; I have never contributed a scientific paper to any ICC nor have I written a ToE. Neither have you, the difference between us is that I'm not claiming I have.I have no claims to justify nor questions to answer; that is YOUR obligation.

Apparently you've been publishing bullshit online since you were 9. OK so you're what mid-20's no formal scientific education and living at home? Mummy and Daddy may have thought you to be an idiot savant when you were younger but they were only half-right.

Stop posting grandiose bullshit, no-one here believes you have a modicum of scientific brilliance.

Let's put it to the forum!

ANYONE who feels RealityCheck is the brilliant scientific saviour he claims to be speak and defend your hero.
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (9) Jan 17, 2015
OZ, mate, give it up will you? Some people who post here know I am who I say I am, and that I am 65 yrs old, atheist since age 9, and lone, scrupulously objective independent researcher engaged in longterm projects aimed at answering/solving BIG and seemingly intractable questions/problems facing Science and Humanity. My work has been for my own curiosity's satisfaction sake as well as to make my contribution to Science and Humanity for duty's sake to my fellow beings.

I never said you claimed to have published 'papers', I only ASKED if you had made any EFFORTS/CONTRIBUTIONS in that area at all instead of trolling people and ignoring ontopic issues raised/linked in this thread for your attention that shows my observations over the years were correct.

You 'frame' me as 20 yrs etc etc, all with no real effort on your part to know the facts about the person you troll, let alone about the science/issues I posted for years. Please stop trolling in ignorance of both, OZ. :)
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (9) Jan 17, 2015
[...continued]
And it's not about me, OZ. "The man is nothing, the work is everything"...and when published, my work will speak for both me and itself.

And OZ, please don't try to involve others so you can troll them as well. Mate, take a long hard look at yourself before you end up worse-than-useless like some trolls already self-evidently self-made so beyond easy remediation. Good luck. :)
Uncle Ira
4.3 / 5 (11) Jan 17, 2015
And OZ, please don't try to involve others so you can troll them as well.


Skippy, I can not believe you say such a thing as that non. Aren't you the one who try to start about six or five votes with the "forum" about me? Aren't you the one who tried with 12 or 10 peoples to get them not to talk with me? Aren't you the one who tells everybody how they are supposed to vote on you? Aren't you the couyon who wanted to moderation the conversation with Nazi-cantdrive-Skippy and the antialias-Skippy and the Captain-Skippy about the magnetical universe theory awhile back?

I am pretty sure that you are the one who did all those things. Your bright shiny silly looking pointy cap sure do look good on you today I gar-ron-tee me.
Maggnus
5 / 5 (6) Jan 17, 2015
I think it's funny, in a sick, childish, pseudo-scientific sort of way, how RC continues to rant on about his amazing TOMN (Theory of Mostly Nothing) by repeating over and over how incredible it is, without any attempt at all of showing even the most basic understanding of physics or math. Now I have no doubt that his next response to me will be some gibberish about how I don't understand his genius or some equally inane bullshit, but the fact remains that he has been playing this childish laughable game for years with the exact same result - it is ALWAYS "coming soon" or "about to be presented". Always.

It is exactly the same thing Rossi does with his fusion crap. He is always about to dazzle the whole world with his working machine. Next month. Or the next few months, at the latest. I think he first said that in 1999.

What is it about such scam artists that some people actually support their delusions? Ignoring whatever RC replies, does anyone have an idea?
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (9) Jan 17, 2015
Hey folks, there comes the troll-gang bot-voting 'brains trust' to prove my points. Not bad timing, hey?

Poor Ira-twit hasn't twigged that I advised how NOT to vote indiscriminately based on person 'from a list' instead of content.

It's bot-votes are so immediate again that it hardly has time to scratch its bum before it pushes the '1' button like a good little programmed bot designed to skew the rating system....just as like-mindless 'professional' twats have skewed the 'professional' peer review system (as those PO articles in the news lately have highlighted and which the trolls here so pointedly AVOID recognizing/addressing while they mindless/malignantly troll and bot-vote on, regardless of any facts.

Dear dear, folks, it's come to a sorry pass for both science and humanity discourse when these bot-voting twats give each other '5' for any old mindless/malignant troll twat-twaddle irrelevance they post, hey!

No wonder science/humanity seems screwed of late!

Maggnus
5 / 5 (5) Jan 17, 2015
ANYONE who feels RealityCheck is the brilliant scientific saviour he claims to be speak and defend your hero.
I can't help but notice that in the deafening silence following this challenge, the only person who spoke up was: Reality Check!

Why am I not surprised. In fact, I am so not surprised, you could knock me over with a feather from not surprised. I'm about to lay down and have a heart attack from the sudden influx of not surprised.
Uncle Ira
3.9 / 5 (11) Jan 17, 2015
What is it about such scam artists that some people actually support their delusions?


Well, I don't know about the other-Skippys with the delusionments. But that does not apply to the Really-Skippy. There is not one other anybody on the whole interweb that ever signed on with him. Not one.

He still somehow thinks it's just the small group of mod-bot-mafia-gang who is making him the misere all the time. When it is actually everybody he ever knew, stood next to, seen from across the street, down through eight levels of knowing somebody that knows somebody, for 16 generations that thinks he is the really Really-Skippy couyon. That means everybody who has ever trodden the earth.

Ignoring whatever RC replies, does anyone have an idea?


I just told you, that doesn't apply to Really-Skippy because there is not the one person on the earth who ever fell for his "I'm the smart-Scientist-Skippy" act. Everybody thinks he is the foolish couyon.
RealityCheck
1.4 / 5 (10) Jan 17, 2015
There it is again, folks, sheer insensibility and ignoring prior info (most recently already posted to OZ above) where I explicitly point out that I want no-one to speak up or for me or my work, since I and it will speak for itself and me when published.

Also their lying attempts o tar me wih the same brush as Rossi is patent bullshit only its fellow twats can applaud with '5'. It doen't figure in heir malignant mentality and tactics that I am NOT SELLING anything nor am I profiting from anything. I am only foreshadowing work to be published, just for FYI o encourage others not to be so depressed/defeatist about the situation that both Science and Humanity has found itself in of late due PRECISELY to he mindless/malignant type twats which have ruined both and have almost brought both practically to its knees by precisely the kind of self-interested ego-tripping disregard for the facts in order to corrupt the system for their own ends.

Poor mean littleminded twats. Pity.
RealityCheck
1.4 / 5 (10) Jan 17, 2015
Poor poor Ira twat doesn't understand the meaning of "lone scrupulously objective independent researcher" AVOIDING INVOLVEMENT with 'groups' and 'gangs' and 'others' to maintain said lone scrupulously objective independence researcher status.

It hasn't dawned on poor Ira twit that I expressly asked others NOT to get involved in supporting me or other ways of 'associating' with me in any way shape or form. That is why no-one has 'leaped to my defense'...because I asked them NOT to do so!....regardless of provocation by idiot twats like IRA et all to involve them so they can troll them too.

Principle and objectivity is an alien concept to these IRA et al twats...no wonder science and humanity is in a mess, hey folks! Pitiable.
Uncle Ira
4.3 / 5 (11) Jan 17, 2015
I expressly asked others NOT to get involved in supporting me or other ways of 'associating' with me in any way shape or form.


You tell the great BIG with that one Skippy. You must not remember starting the six or five polls asking the "forum" to vote on whether you were getting the fair treatment from my votes and to make a vote against me for making the fun with you.

because I asked them NOT to do so!...


Does not matter if you say it two more times to go with those times. It's still the great BIG lie.

You know you begged the "forum" to lend you some helps in taking me on. The reason you forget is because nobody seemed to want to help you, even after you made the fool of your self begging them to six or five times,,,,,,, but a whole BIG bunch of them chimed in to tell you are the BIG couyon. Don't remember everybody using the word PATHETIC a bunch that day? About your polls?
RealityCheck
1.4 / 5 (10) Jan 17, 2015
Poor poor Ira twat, doesn't understand I was asking others to make their OWN stand and opinions clear about the corrupting ANTI-science/humanity-ethics you and your mindless BOT-voting is perpetrating here. How many have APPROVED of your ADMITTED personally motivated hate-list bot-voting irrespective of science/humanity content posted, you poor dumbfuck?

That is how dumbfuck BULLIES operate to corrupt both the science and humanity discourse. They collect a 'gang' of eager equally moronic twats to 'follow the idiot leader', just as they have been stupidly and malignantly doing here for their own agendas....

https://sciencex....k/?v=act

Poor poor Uncle-fucked Ira twat, pretends to have any leg to stand on when he is just a BOT-using moron which anyone can be on the net no matter how dumbfucked they are as long as they can follow the BOT-voting instructions that come with the off-the-shelf-ratings-skewing-program it is using.

Poor insensible BOT-clot.
Uncle Ira
4.3 / 5 (11) Jan 17, 2015
I haven't seen any scientists or humans coming around to thank you for all you are doing for them. They must be ungrateful selfish couyons for not to realize how the Really-Skippy spends his days defending their honors and dishonoring Ira-Skippy.
Uncle Ira
4.3 / 5 (11) Jan 17, 2015
@ P.S. for you Really-Skippy. You should try to be the more careful with your language Skippy. If you don't ol Bennie-Skippy is going to make you a ROC. Don't ask me what the ROC is because I don't know, it's just what Bennie-Skippy does when he doesn't like the peoples using the bad words on the physorg.
OZGuy
4.4 / 5 (7) Jan 17, 2015
RC
So you're 65 and been expounding the same crap for 56 years. How many poor sods have you inflicted your ego puffing BS on? I shudder to think. You must be a blast at parties.

You have no hope now of garnering support from Benni with being 65 and using f#ck so often a word search on the page for it slows things down. He likes them young and innocent.

Accept it, you are NEVER going to publish ANYTHING that will revolutionise science and unless you host an ICC and introduce the speakers you won't ever be formally talking at one.

You do realise this is a science news forum where anything and everything we write will be wiped in due course. Stop the grandiose bullshit claims that NO-ONE is interested in reading and go enjoy life while there is time.

The Reality-cavalry is coming to the rescue, whether you like it or not, or believe it or not.
NO you're not. This isn't Ripley's where the incredible is true.
THIS is Ripley's http://www.ripleys.com.
RealityCheck
1.4 / 5 (10) Jan 17, 2015
OZ, what does it take, mate??

I have been 'soundboarding and discussing scientific aspects/explanations while in the process of researching/finalizing Reality-based complete GUT/ToE for publication whole, and NOT 'piecemeal' like the usual 'publish or perish' way of 'professionals' who haven't a clue how to complete the reality-based GUT/ToE. This latter state of affairs is self-evident after 100 YEARS of piling abstract maths upon abstract maths constructs.

I have also been OBJECTIVELY observing, and PROPERLY cautioning against, the PROVEN CONFIRMATION BIAS 'inbuilt' over he DECADES into he assumptions/literature/peer review of/for 'studies' in CMB/Big Bang etc. Those links I gave you were to MAINSTREAM professional scientists NOW observing and cautioning against the VERY SAME things I have been.

I have been true to science and humanity ethics. But you contribute only personal social media type trolling; ignorant of ALL the facts. Don't end up like "Uncle Ira" twat. Eeeww!
Uncle Ira
4.3 / 5 (11) Jan 17, 2015
Don't end up like "Uncle Ira"


@ Oz-Skippy. Yeah, don't end up like ol Ira-Skippy. He's got the really nice wife, great 12 year old kid. A good job with a company that has bosses that like me. Worked at the same kind of work for 25 years now. So I do it really good and I have job security me. I own my house and the lot it sits on, and the lot on each side of it. I got two cars and the wife has one too. (Actually one of my cars is not the care but the truck.) I get to hunt and fish about any time I want to and the boat to do it out of. But all those things aren't the best of each of them that someone else might have, but it's everything I want.My cars are four and three years old. My boat is 11 years old and only 21 feets.My job won't make me a millionairary. But I am so thankful for what I got and that I don't have whatever it is that makes Really-Skippy so grumpy and mad all the time.

Non Cher you don't want to be like me, you want to be like Really-Skippy, eh?
OZGuy
4.4 / 5 (7) Jan 17, 2015
RC
What does it take? For what?
To acknowledge you as a scientific genius? A major loss of cognitive function and reasoning due to severe head trauma MAY do the trick.
To shut me up? You publishing your ToE and appearing at the ICC with your GW solution; basically living up to your claims..

Any betting man would put his money on the the former happening rather than the latter.

Posting a list of favourites isn't publishing. It appears you have wasted 56 years, don't waste any more of your or our time with BS. If you haven't garnered from your soundboarding to-date that your genius is BS then there is no hope for you.

Neither you nor I are EVER going to publish a revolutionary scientific treatise, difference is I don't keep shouting that I am.
OZGuy
4.4 / 5 (7) Jan 17, 2015
Ira
BUT mate you could have been more like RC and spent your entire life trying to change the world... one grumpy delusional rant at a time.

Ira in all seriousness you HAVE the life most want. You know what you want, have the ability to achieve it and and the commonsense to appreciate it. Good luck to you and Mrs Ira I hope things stay sweet.
RealityCheck
1.4 / 5 (10) Jan 17, 2015
...and Ira also here bot-voting!...based on personal hate list while understanding/contributing nothing relevant to science/humanity discourse which this site is on the net FOR. There are billions with what Uncle Ira 'has', but very few who IN ADDITION try to bring sanity and fair comment and contribution to science and humanity ethics/discussion.

Bot-voting CREEPs like Uncle Ignorant Troll try to con feeble minded ego-tripping like-mindless gullible/malignant twats that what he 'has' is 'ok'...while he ALSO makes a mockery of all that those 'things' are supposedly based on and stand for.

What a self-immersed CREEP of a useless twat in boh science and humanity terms. And after he admitted more than once that he bot-voted me FIRST and continues to because he 'didn't like me', he now tries to turn around and accuse me of pointing out his idiocy and anti-science/humanity bot-vote tactics because I 'don't like' HIM. Poor clot can't stand being 'outed' OBJECTIVELY for bot-voting. :)
Uncle Ira
4.1 / 5 (10) Jan 17, 2015
Ira
BUT mate you could have been more like RC and spent your entire life trying to change the world... one grumpy delusional rant at a time.


Yeah, I could have been more like the Really-Skippy, I guess I blew it me.

Ira in all seriousness you HAVE the life most want. You know what you want, have the ability to achieve it and and the commonsense to appreciate it. Good luck to you and Mrs Ira I hope things stay sweet.


Thank you for that. I have a good life with more blessings then I probably deserve.

RealityCheck
1.4 / 5 (10) Jan 17, 2015
Hey OZ, while you pander to creeps like bot-voting loser like "Uncle", you demonstrate lack of objective and fairminded character. That is further proof, if any more were needed, that you are not and never will have what it takes to be a truly objective independent thinker and scientist. You ridicule in ignorance of both the person and the work. You keep exchanging '5' with Ira Bot-Vote Moron & Co.

You are truly the 'best judge' and 'trusted brains trust' here, hey? IRONY.

It is sad to see an Aussie sink to the level of an Ira-bot moron-cohort so willingly and completely, as demonstrated here...

https://sciencex....k/?v=act

...while he STILL has NOT recognized or addressed the linked info/articles for his information as to facts rather than the lying version being perpetrated by the moronic 'daisy chain' of stupids 'goosing each other' with '5' while being so malignantly, tragically stupid like hat for all to see. Pitiable creeps.
Uncle Ira
4.3 / 5 (11) Jan 17, 2015
Eeewi!


Ohyeeei to you too Really-Skippy. But you got mixed on part of that and right on part of that.

I started down voting you because on your very first post to me you call stupid, ignorant, troll, and idiot. That made me not like you. The only part you are not lying about is why I down vote you. Because I do not like you. You sure are dense headed for a genius scientist. What Cher? You think I"m going to vote you up because I feel sorry for your mental condition? Non podna, that thing is not going to happen.

Oz-Skippy ask anybody, Captain-Skippy or Magnus-Skippy or Whydening-Skippy or antialias-Skippy or any other normal Skippys here on physorg. Really-Skippy started in on me on day one, and it is not my fault he has got his feeling hurt everyday since day two. That's his fault for being so silly and weird (everywhere he has ever been on, ask Captain-Skippy about that, he has the lists.)
RealityCheck
1.4 / 5 (10) Jan 17, 2015
Poor Uncle BOT-voting Clot. Lying is not going to do you any good. You BOT-voted FIRST and then ADMITED you do so because of a hate list, not content. Now you try to snow the forum and try to drag others into your lying crap? Eeeeww.

What a creepy lying bot-voting numb-brained Uncle this is, folks! It's worse than ever. Pitiable.
Uncle Ira
4.3 / 5 (11) Jan 17, 2015
Poor Uncle BOT-voting Clot. Lying is not going to do you any good. You BOT-voted FIRST and then ADMITED you do so because of a hate list, not content. Now you try to snow the forum and try to drag others into your lying crap? Eeeeww.

What a creepy lying bot-voting numb-brained Uncle this is, folks! It's worse than ever. Pitiable.


That would fly on a forum that doesn't know you. Here they know you better than anywhere else, because this the only place you haven't been given to boot for being so much smarter than everybody.
Uncle Ira
4.3 / 5 (11) Jan 17, 2015
@ Really-Skippy. Everybody else might want to play some more with you. But I got to clear out of here, 10 meters is opening up (that's a Amateur band that will let me talk to some peoples in Alaska or Hawaii) and it's not often you can DX on that band. And that is more fun than fooling around you Cher.
RealityCheck
1.4 / 5 (10) Jan 17, 2015
Poor creepy Ira twat. "They know" hardly anything about either me or my work to be published, as all "their" trolling me lately have clearly demonstrated for the forum. The fact that I was banned elsewhere for proving and exposing mod-troll-gang ABUSES and CORRUPTION is what proves my point, you poor excuse for a BOT-brained jackass. You still don't 'get' it, do you, moron. The facts speak for themselves. Your idiot-gang BOT-voting 'version' is already dead in the water of reality. Pitiable creeps like you have lost all credibility when it comes to the facts of the matter...because I proved and exposed you by experinment and confronting you with the proof in front of he forums for everyone to see what 'standards' of 'ethics' you 'employ' as TROLL gang members. Creeps. You're now polluting the Amateur radio waves band with your idiotic lying creepy crap too? Eeewww.
OZGuy
4.4 / 5 (7) Jan 18, 2015
IRA
Consider the source. RC abuses you ( and everyone else) because he is jealous. He has no supporters here, I suspect no friends anywhere if posts here are the real RC. He is a frustrated self-proclaimed genius who has contributed NOTHING to further the cause of science and is running out of time to do so. Fixty-six years of wasted life when he could have done what you did and been happy. So Ira consider the source, put his rants into context then treat them with the contempt they deserve, l'homme est sous le mépris.
OZGuy
4.4 / 5 (7) Jan 18, 2015
RC
No-one gets banned for pointing out trolls, they get banned for being a troll.

Why are you wasting your time ranting here when you could writing down your brilliant insights into science? Time is running out for submitting papers for the 2015 ICC and the ToE is getting gout yet you're here ranting?

You may be 65 but you still have a LOT of growing up to do and you really shouldn't try to play with others until you do.
RealityCheck
1.4 / 5 (10) Jan 19, 2015
OZGuy. The evidence of my anti-mod-troll-gang exposure experiments on other sites speak for themselves, if you'd had the courage/honesty to recognize/address it. Denying and lying to make you/your gang appear less losers than you have been proven already is futile.

So far P.O is ok. I exposed Dr-toad (alias saposjoint etc) as a malignant troll, and he was banned by an honest moderator; and I have not been banned for responding/exposing your/idiot Ira et al's gratuitous trolling, bot-voting, skewing and sabotaging of otherwise fair discourse/ratings system.

You even post unprovoked gratuitous trolls/misinformation about me between you troll gangmembers, in other threads I haven't even commented in! Way to be a 'credible objective participant'. Not.

You don't address the linked facts which prove me right and you idiotically ignorant of both me and my work. That makes you dishonest brainless biased twats which the Scientific Method was supposed to weed out and exclude. Losers.
OZGuy
4.4 / 5 (7) Jan 20, 2015
RC
Nice rant but you still won't be publishing a ToE or attending and presenting at the ICC now will you.

You claim a list of favourites supposedly proves your work, what work? You have presented NOTHING but links and posts boasting your brilliance or insulting others!

You have published NOTHING but bluster, bile and bravado and to be honest I think you've peaked.

Prepare a paper or the mighty ToE and publish it with a recognised scientific body then you can provide a link to that. Me and gang can read it while waiting for you to appear on stage at the ICC and save the world from Global Warming.

The "reality cavalry is coming"...so is Santa Claus.
RealityCheck
1.4 / 5 (9) Jan 20, 2015
Good morning, OZ. Thats it? I posted links that confirm the accuracy of my objective observations and you call them 'favourites' while you avoid addressing them?

I also made clear last year I had withdrawn from detailed discussion of my work for reasons made clear at the time. But many have found plenty of snippets over the years of what I was completing in reality-based GUT/ToE explanation/publication work. But you remain ignorant of both me and my work while you make lame rationalizations and trolls to divert attention from your failure.

I merely foreshadowed my publishing to dispel the tone of despair and impasse that had begun to be evident in forum discussion, and was disheartening even those genuine members who were not here to troll like you and that loser gang you run with.

My work will be published irrespective of your wishes or intents, OZ. You have made yourself ridiculously clear as an unscientific 'personality cult' troll and, thus, irrelevant. Bye OZ.
OZGuy
4.4 / 5 (7) Jan 21, 2015
Bye RC go back to your make believe world where you are the font of all knowledge and the scientific community kneels at your feet. You have NEVER published ANYTHING and never will. Crackpot comments don't lay the foundations for any reason to believe you have any more knowledge that the average person in the street, possibly less.

We in the real world won't miss you .
RealityCheck
1.5 / 5 (8) Jan 22, 2015
Poor OZ, still in denial of facts which would be efficacious to your recovery if you took the trouble to actually look and address them.
Bye RC go back to your make believe world where you are the font of all knowledge and the scientific community kneels at your feet. You have NEVER published ANYTHING and never will. Crackpot comments don't lay the foundations for any reason to believe you have any more knowledge that the average person in the street, possibly less.

We in the real world won't miss you .


It's you living in fantasy land, OZ...only you are too lazy and stupid a troll to realize it.

Is this all you have contributed to science and humanity so far?...trolling your personality cult crap across the internet while failing to actually address anything except your own 'fantasy versions' of what has transpired about me and my work to date?

You poor sod. Ira is an idiot born and bred and self-maintained so; but YOU are worse, for abetting his idiocy. Pity.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.