'Gold rush' threatens tropical forests in South America

January 13, 2015, Institute of Physics
Rain forest canopy at the Forestry Research Institute Malaysia. Credit: Wikipedia.

A global "gold rush" has led to a significant increase of deforestation in the tropical forests of South America.

This is according to new research publish today, 14 January, in IOP Publishing's journal Environmental Research Letters, which has highlighted the growing environmental impact of in some of the most biologically diverse regions in the tropics.

Researchers from the University of Puerto Rico have shown that between 2001 and 2013, around 1680 km2 of tropical was lost in South America as a result of gold mining, which increased from around 377 km2 to 1303km2 since the global economic crisis in 2007.

Furthermore, around 90 per cent of this forest loss occurred in just four areas and a large proportion occurred within the vicinity of conservation areas.

Lead author of the research Nora L. Álvarez-Berríos said: "Although the loss of forest due to mining is smaller in extent compared to deforestation caused by other land uses, such as agriculture or grazing areas, deforestation due to mining is occurring in some of the most biologically diverse regions in the tropics. For example, in the Madre de Dios Region in Perú, one hectare of forest can hold up to 300 species of trees."

Driven by personal consumption and uncertainty in global financial markets, global gold production has increased to meet rising demand, increasing from around 2445 metric tons in 2000 to around 2770 metric tons in 2013.

Increased demand for gold has been paralleled by a dramatic increase in price—the price of gold increased from $250/ounce in 2000 to $1300/ounce in 2013.

This has stimulated new gold mining activities around the world and made it feasible to mine for gold in areas that were not previously profitable for mining, such as deposits underneath .

This can lead to extensive forest loss and result in serious environmental and ecological impacts, caused by the removal of vegetation, the set-up of roads and railways for access and the creation of unorganised settlements.

Some of the long-term impacts include the failure of vegetation to regrow, changing of rainfall patterns, the permanent loss of biodiversity, and a release of CO2 into the atmosphere.

In their study, the researchers sought to quantify the impacts of gold mines in tropical forests by creating a geographical database that highlighted the location of newly developed mines between 2000 and 2013.

The database was then cross-referenced with annual land cover maps showing the change of forest cover over the same period.

The study encompassed the tropical and subtropical forest biome in South America below 1000 m, covering Colombia, Venezuela, Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana, Brazil, Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia.

Results showed that over the 13 year period, 89 per cent of occurred in just four regions: the Guianan moist forest ecoregion; the Southwest Amazon moist forest ecoregion; the Tapajós-Xingú moist forest ecoregion; and The Magdalena Valley-Urabá region.

Although there was little deforestation inside strict protection areas, around a third of the total deforestation occurred within a 10-km buffer zone around these areas and thus made the areas susceptible to harmful impacts from chemical pollutants that are dispersed from a mining area.

"To decrease the amount of that is occurring as a result of gold mining in the tropical forests, it is important that awareness is raised among gold consumers to understand the environmental and social impacts of buying gold jewellery or investing in gold.

"It is important to also encourage more responsible ways of extracting by helping miners to extract in a more efficient way to reduce deeper encroachment into the forests," continued Álvarez-Berríos.

Explore further: Gold mining ravages Peru

More information: 'Global demand for gold is another threat for tropical forests' Nora L Alvarez-Berríos et al 2015 Environ. Res. Lett. 10 014006. iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/10/1/014006/article

Related Stories

Gold mining ravages Peru

October 28, 2013

For the first time, researchers have been able to map the true extent of gold mining in the biologically diverse region of Madre De Dios in the Peruvian Amazon. The team combined field surveys with airborne mapping and high-resolution ...

Gold prices spur six-fold spike in Amazon deforestation

April 19, 2011

Deforestation in parts of the Peruvian Amazon has increased six-fold in recent years as small-scale miners, driven by record gold prices, blast and clear more of the lowland rainforest, according to a new Duke University-led ...

Gold rush an ecological disaster for Peruvian Amazon

November 28, 2014

A lush expanse of Amazon rainforest known as the "Mother of God" is steadily being destroyed in Peru, with the jungle giving way to mercury-filled tailing ponds used to extract the gold hidden underground.

Recommended for you

The pace at which the world's permafrost soils are warming

January 16, 2019

Global warming is causing increasing damage in the world's permafrost regions. As the new global comparative study conducted by the international permafrost network GTN-P shows, in all regions with permafrost soils the temperature ...

Sewers could help clean the atmosphere

January 16, 2019

Sewage treatment—an unglamorous backbone of urban living—could offer a cost-effective way to combat climate change by flushing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2 / 5 (2) Jan 13, 2015
Those tropical forest didn't exist 2 million years ago and they probably won't exist in another 2 million years. Mining does no permanent harm to the environment. Otherwise the world would never recover from things like Ice Ages, chicxulub and the Siberian traps.
4.7 / 5 (3) Jan 13, 2015
Adding mercury to the environment doesn't do any good.
not rated yet Jan 15, 2015
Those tropical forest didn't exist 2 million years ago and they probably won't exist in another 2 million years. Mining does no permanent harm to the environment. Otherwise the world would never recover from things like Ice Ages, chicxulub and the Siberian traps.

I am all for the progress of humanity, and Shootist, you are right, but those changes have taken affect over hundreds of thousands, if not millions of years. The rainforests that was the middle east turned to desert while the rain forests in south america formed. It did not happen or change over night. Nature fixes everything, but it takes a lot of time. My personal opinion is, leave the lungs of the earth alone. Focus on technology that will allow us to tap in to the vast resources inside our solar system. There is a lot more money to be made by the people who make industrial space expansion possible, than the bit of gold. Places that our survival of a species is not depended on. Just in case you are wrong.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.