Alaska shows no signs of rising Arctic methane

November 17, 2014 by Carol Rasmussen
This photo taken during the CARVE experiment shows polygonal lakes created by melting permafrost on Alaska's North Slope. Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

Despite large temperature increases in Alaska in recent decades, a new analysis of NASA airborne data finds that methane is not being released from Alaskan soils into the atmosphere at unusually high rates, as recent modeling and experimental studies have suggested. The new result shows that the changes in this part of the Arctic have not yet had enough impact to affect the global methane budget.

This is important because is the third most common greenhouse gas in the atmosphere, after water vapor and . Although there is much less of it in the air, it is 33 times more effective than carbon dioxide at trapping heat in the atmosphere and adding to greenhouse warming.

High concentrations of have been measured at individual Arctic sites, especially in Siberia. This adds to the concern that massive methane releases are already occurring in the far North. NASA's multiyear Carbon in Arctic Reservoirs Vulnerability Experiment (CARVE) is the first experiment to establish emission rates for a large region of the Arctic.

In the new study, researchers analyzed methane measurements made over Alaska from May through September 2012 during the first season of CARVE. They estimated emission rates for the winter months, during most of which no methane was released because the soil was frozen.

Alaska composes about one percent of Earth's total land area, and its estimated annual emissions in 2012 equaled about one percent of total global methane emissions. That means the Alaskan rate was very close to the global average rate.

"That's good news, because it means there isn't a large amount of methane coming out of the ground yet," said lead author Rachel Chang, formerly at Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and now an assistant professor and Canada Research Chair in Atmospheric Science at Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia.

Charles Miller of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, the principal investigator for CARVE, noted that results from a single year cannot show how emissions might be changing from year to year. "The 2012 data don't preclude accelerated change in the future," he said.

Vast amounts of carbon are stored in undecayed organic matter—dead plants and animals—in Arctic permafrost and peat. Scientists estimate that there is more than twice as much carbon locked in the frozen North as there is in the atmosphere today. The organic material won't decay and release its carbon as long as it stays frozen. But climate change has brought warmer and longer summers throughout the Arctic, and permafrost soils are thawing more and more. If large amounts of undecayed matter were to defrost, decompose and release methane and carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, the impact on global temperatures would most likely be enormous.

CARVE is a pioneering regional study of methane and across Alaska. CARVE makes frequent and sustained science flights across Alaska using NASA's Arctic-tested Sherpa C-23B aircraft. The C-23 carries a variety of research sensors, including gas analyzers that link CARVE methane and carbon dioxide measurements to World Meteorological Organization standards. Flight campaigns occur each month throughout the growing season (May through October), when Arctic carbon emissions are at their highest and change most rapidly. CARVE science flights began in 2012 and will continue through 2015.

Because no other program has made measurements as comprehensive and widespread as CARVE's, Chang said, "One of the challenges is that we have nothing to compare our results to. We can't say whether emissions have already increased or stayed the same. Our measurements will serve as a baseline."

The results are available online in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Explore further: NASA air campaigns focus on Arctic climate impacts

More information: Additional information on the CARVE investigation may be found at: science.nasa.gov/missions/carve/

Related Stories

NASA air campaigns focus on Arctic climate impacts

September 17, 2014

Over the past few decades, average global temperatures have been on the rise, and this warming is happening two to three times faster in the Arctic. As the region's summer comes to a close, NASA is hard at work studying how ...

With few data, Arctic carbon models lack consensus

September 25, 2014

(Phys.org) —As climate change grips the Arctic, how much carbon is leaving its thawing soil and adding to Earth's greenhouse effect? The question has long been debated by scientists. A new study conducted as part of NASA's ...

Recommended for you

Scientists solve mystery of unexplained 'bright nights'

June 21, 2017

Dating back to the first century, scientists, philosophers and reporters have noted the occasional occurrence of "bright nights," when an unexplained glow in the night sky lets observers see distant mountains, read a newspaper ...

New research leverages big data to predict severe weather

June 21, 2017

Every year, severe weather endangers millions of people and causes billions of dollars in damage worldwide. But new research from Penn State's College of Information Sciences and Technology (IST) and AccuWeather has found ...

Measuring biological dust in the wind

June 21, 2017

In the popular children's story "Horton Hears a Who!" author Dr. Seuss tells of a gentle and protective elephant who stumbles upon a speck of dust that harbors a community of microscopic creatures called the Whos living the ...

9 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Eikka
3 / 5 (4) Nov 17, 2014
The new result shows that the changes in this part of the Arctic have not yet had enough impact to affect the global methane budget.


I think that's begging the question that the methane release is an inevitable outcome.
antigoracle
2 / 5 (4) Nov 17, 2014
And so one more lie from the AGW Cult is revealed.
gkam
2.3 / 5 (6) Nov 17, 2014
If folk think increased warming will not release significant amounts of Methane, I have some "WMD!" to sell them.
bmorrow492
1 / 5 (4) Nov 18, 2014
Hardly surprising. Science by computer modeling is often suspect at best. A computer model will predict anything that it is programmed to predict.
antigoracle
1 / 5 (2) Nov 18, 2014
If folk think increased warming will not release significant amounts of Methane, I have some "WMD!" to sell them.

It's a pity, you can't buy a brain.
Modernmystic
3.3 / 5 (3) Nov 18, 2014
I'm not nearly as concerned with methane as CO2. It doesn't stay in the atmosphere long, also much of the "man made" methane emissions are attributed to things like agriculture, and "enteric fermentation"....if you can't see the problem with that classification then you need to think...well just THINK.
MikPetter
3.7 / 5 (3) Nov 18, 2014
As the study notes this is just the first season of data for just alaska. extract from article ..."Because no other program has made measurements as comprehensive and widespread as CARVE's, Chang said, "One of the challenges is that we have nothing to compare our results to. We can't say whether emissions have already increased or stayed the same. Our measurements will serve as a baseline."

Read more at: http://phys.org/n...tml#jCp"
Mike_Massen
4.5 / 5 (8) Nov 19, 2014
antigoracle again trying to marginalise the progress of Science
And so one more lie from the AGW Cult is revealed.
You have been told many times before AGW is not a religion therefore not a cult, there is no deity, it has been hypothesized for >100 years. Your preoccupation with al gore does you no credit, politicians have nothing to do with the Science of hypothesis & measurement etc Hypothesis of AGW was considered before al gore was born.

You come across as a lout & even an ill informed paid lout, why are you here at all ?

What particular 'lie' are you claiming was revealed ?

Alaska is a small part of USA which is only 2% of the world, why are U being so abrasive.

You have been on this forum for > 5yrs & contributed nothing; no rationalisation, no hypothesis, no education, nothing useful your rants only inflame & irritate what should be dialectic or useful debate. You should be banned.
gkam
2.6 / 5 (5) Nov 19, 2014
Mike, the ignore choice is wonderful. I no longer put up with his rants, nor those of otto, JowBlow, and others. You will miss nothing, because they only whine and complain.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.