Clemson leads research on new materials that could make it safer to store nuclear waste

Minerals that endure in nature for millions of years are inspiring a Clemson University-led research team to explore whether new materials could be developed to encase nuclear waste for safe storage.

Glass is now used to isolate , but a team led by Clemson's Kyle Brinkman is hoping to develop materials that are more stable. The team's work could help broaden disposal options and lower storage and disposal costs.

The three-year project recently won an $800,000 research grant from the U.S. Department of Energy's Nuclear Energy University Programs.

The team's research is focused on crystalline ceramic that will be based on naturally occurring minerals that endure for millions of years. One example is hollandite that is dug out of the Italian Alps and shows promise for housing cesium.

"Our project is to learn from these naturally occurring, naturally stable minerals and design crystal structures that mimic them to incorporate waste elements we want to store," said Brinkman, a Clemson associate professor of materials science and engineering.

Anand Gramopadhye, dean of the College of Engineering and Science, said the research is a good fit for South Carolina, where about half the energy is generated by nuclear power.

"It is vital to our health and our environment to find safe storage options for nuclear waste," Gramopadhye said. "We owe it to South Carolina and our nation, not only for us, but also for our children and future generations."

The research is aimed at giving policymakers the data they need to weigh options as they decide whether to recycle used from commercial power plants. That waste is now kept at in pools or dry-cask storage across the country.

Current U.S. policy is to not recycle used nuclear fuel.

Components of used nuclear fuel can be reprocessed into fresh fuel. But even with reprocessing, some leftover material is no longer usable.

The crystalline ceramic that researchers are developing would encase the leftover material. Once it's trapped in the crystalline ceramic, it would be put in a container and buried in a miles-deep repository in a stable rock formation. The crystalline ceramic would act as a last line of defense, keeping the waste from spreading if it should ever come in contact with water.

Researchers believe the crystalline ceramic would be more stable than glass, which is now used by several countries to isolate high-level commercial and defense waste. The waste is melted into the glass, a process called vitrification, and then put it in a repository.

"Glass is a proven material for incorporating high-level waste," Brinkman said. "However, over millions of years, it is believed that ceramics would be even better. So our project is to look at ."

Collaborators on the project are Rajendra K. Bordia, chairman of Clemson's materials science and engineering department; Kenneth L. Reifsnider of the University of South Carolina; Wilson K.S. Chiu of the University of Connecticut; and James C. Marra of Savannah River National Laboratory.

"The research will help us strengthen ties between Clemson University and Savannah River National Laboratory," Bordia said. "It also helps South Carolina boost its already strong national reputation in nuclear research. We've built a specialty in finding the safest ways to generate nuclear energy and dispose of the waste."

Several separate nuclear-related projects are underway in Clemson's College of Engineering and Science, including one that was recently awarded $5.25 million to conduct field experiments on waste.

Clemson researchers will make and analyze the crystalline materials but will not need to use nuclear waste for the research. They will send the ceramics to collaborators for further analysis and to make three-dimensional computer simulations.

Explore further

Changes ordered at Los Alamos over nuke waste leak

Provided by Clemson University
Citation: Clemson leads research on new materials that could make it safer to store nuclear waste (2014, October 14) retrieved 22 July 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Oct 15, 2014
1 part aluminum powder and 1 part iron oxide powder, mix with 1 part nuclear waste.

Stir with browns gas, or Rhodes gas.

At a certain point in the mixing... the mix will emit a low 'pop', and the radiation level of the waste will permanently drop to a new low of approx 98% less radiation output.

This experimental result was confirmed by the at least one first world nuclear regulatory agency.

We could get rid of all nuclear waste, if we had governments (and backroom power structures) that would allow this technology to exist.

Ask yourself why this is not generally known, or used.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more