Sensors everywhere could mean privacy nowhere, expert says

September 16, 2014 by Steve Tally
The risks and benefits of the Internet of Things will be the subject of a lecture by Purdue computer science professor Eugene Spafford at the upcoming Dawn or Doom conference. The conference, which will examine the role of several rapidly expanding technologies in society, will be Thursday (Sept. 18) and is free and open to the public. Credit: Purdue University image

Just as we are coming to grips with having less privacy in our lives thanks to the Internet, a new use of the technology is poised to present new questions about security and privacy - and create a new threat to society.

Eugene Spafford, professor of computer science at Purdue University and executive director of the Center for Education and Research in Information Assurance and Security (CERIAS), says the so-called "Internet of Things" will see small and sensors placed seemingly everywhere, and these devices will collect much data about us - often without our knowledge.

"Instead of a small number of scholars recording data, we will soon have millions and soon billions of tireless digital observers recording everything within reach, and storing it forever," Spafford says. "The benefit will be better decision making about many aspects of our lives, such as energy use, decisions about our health and financial decisions. The downside is that we give up a lot of our privacy, and, in fact, maybe all of it."

Ubiquitous Internet microprocessors will soon be in things we encounter every day. Spafford says examples are already appearing.

"We have the Nest thermostat, which does a better job of learning how we like to heat or cool our homes than previous thermostats, and we are beginning to see Internet-connected refrigerators, which can let us know when we need to buy groceries and pull together a shopping list for us," he says.

The problem is that consumers have little or no control about how the data collected will be used, or even knowledge about what data is being collected.

"We put ourselves in a position where we may be manipulated without our consent, and possibly without our knowledge, because connections may be drawn on this data that we don't understand or recognize even about ourselves," Spafford says. "For example the company that makes the Nest thermostat was purchased by Google. Now Google will know when I'm home, can determine how many people are in the house, and that information will be provided to other companies and government agencies. Is that a trade I'm willing to make? To what extent can I control that?"

Spafford will discuss security and privacy of "The Internet of Things" in a lecture titled "Faster Than Our Understanding" at a conference at Purdue called Dawn or Doom: The New Technology Explosion.

The Dawn or Doom conference is being held Thursday (Sept. 18) on the Purdue West Lafayette campus and is free and open to the public.

Spafford says what is needed is consumer information equivalent to the drug information that is packaged with each medication.

"We need a notice of the level of some of these observations, and which of these observations should we be allowed to opt out of. There needs to be greater transparency about what is done with the information that's collected, the accuracy of the data and where it's going," he says.

A second concern with the Internet of Everything is that we may have already crossed a threshold where a large event that would cripple these devices would mean that our current civilization would come to an immediate stop.

"Our telephones wouldn't work, hospitals would not be able to do medical tests, at the university we wouldn't be able to post grades," Spafford says.

An occurrence of a massive solar flare, like the 1859 Carrington Event, could disable all of these devices.

"If something like that were to happen, the Amish would become the only people without a major life upheaval," Spafford says.

Explore further: Cybersecurity expert says White House lack of 'czar' is subpar

Related Stories

US proving Internet-adept and inept at same time

October 31, 2013

When it comes to computers, the Obama administration appears simultaneously to be an amateur and a wizard. The same government that reportedly intercepted the communications of leading U.S. consumer technology firms, Google ...

The next internet revolution brings data to the market

April 3, 2014

Every day, our lives are being captured digitally in the data that is generated by our transactions, interactions and movements. And as we become more connected through the internet of things, even more data is being generated. ...

Recommended for you

Old, meet new: Drones, high-tech camera revamp archaeology

November 24, 2017

Scanning an empty field that once housed a Shaker village in New Hampshire, Jesse Casana had come in search of the foundations of stone buildings, long-forgotten roadways and other remnants of this community dating to the ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (1) Sep 16, 2014
Stuff that !!

I get enough grief when a CB rig goes by; my WiFi repeater takes its signal as an attack and 'fails safe'...

And, yes, a bunch of stuff linked to the repeater 'fails safe', too, leaving half my 'home network' off line...

Having been an 'early uptaker' of 'home control' equipment, via hand-set rather than app, I can honestly say such equipment is often exceedingly exasperating. 'Through the mains' control can simply stop working. At times, I've been unable to send commands between adjacent power sockets. Wireless hand-sets interfere with other stuff, such as cordless phones and doorbells. IR-controlled lights can be blinded by a new --Or old-- CFL...

Due care, please ? And *always* have a manual over-ride....
1 / 5 (2) Sep 18, 2014
Compatibility is not the problem: Big Brother is the problem.

In 1967 I helped to set up, test, deploy and operate the Electronic Battlefield in Southeast Asia. With this system, using our sensors we could listen in on what the Commies were doing, and often saying.

Under Reagan, then Bush, this kind of stuff was expanded to include us. As we became the targets of our own intelligence organizations, they became VERY powerful, now controlling Senators and Congressmen, and possibly, . . presidents.

How do we get America Back?
1 / 5 (2) Sep 18, 2014
Under Reagan, then Bush,

Why not mention how Clinton and Obama have abused their power?
Why did Roberts support Obamacare, at the last minute?
"Was David Petraeus being blackmailed to toe the line? Here's why it could be possible. The FBI discovered that Petraeus was having an affair with his biographer and when he was confronted with the evidence, Petraeus asked that he be allowed to "step down" on his own.

The CIA Director being under investigation is no small deal, yet the White House did not notify Congress:"
1 / 5 (2) Sep 18, 2014
Jimmy Carter:

"Pursuant to Section 102(a)(1) of the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1802(a)), the Attorney General
is authorized to approve electronic surveillance to acquire foreign
intelligence information without a court order, but only if the
Attorney General makes the certifications required by that Section."
not rated yet Oct 03, 2014
Yes that's was true, if the sensor every where there will be no privacy, even with in the toilet

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.