A multi-model geoengineering assessment looks at potential climate effects

September 1, 2014
An international team led by scientists from PNNL analyzed output from a dozen climate models to determine how geoengineering—changing temperature and precipitation through technology—might affect 22 world regions. Credit: Wikimedia Commons.

Climate geoengineering uses technology to temporarily reduce the effects of climate change by reflecting a small portion of sunlight back to space. As recently reported in Environmental Research Letters, an international team of scientists led by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory researchers used the output from climate models to evaluate which regions of the globe might be made "better" or "worse" by such geoengineering.

"We hope to further an open dialogue about geoengineering," said Dr. Ben Kravitz, atmospheric scientist at PNNL, who led the study. "What does geoengineering look like when different technologies are used? What climates could be achieved? What can geoengineering not do? And how will people be affected?"

Rising concerns about the climate's future have prompted research into using geoengineering techniques to temporarily alleviate some of the effects of increased carbon dioxide. Some proposed ideas include putting mirrors in space, injecting sulfur gas high into the stratosphere to mimic a volcanic eruption, and brightening low clouds over the ocean, all of which can affect the climate. But how would those effects change for different amounts of geoengineering, and how might they differ for different regions of the globe? This multi-model study is a major step toward understanding the potential effects of geoengineering.

Researchers from across the United States as well as Canada, China, Denmark, Germany, Japan, and Norway used the output from 12 that form part of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project, which seeks to understand the of geoengineering. These models represent different aspects of climate physics in slightly different ways. In the current study, scientists analyzed the simulated amount of geoengineering that would restore temperature and precipitation in 22 populated world regions to preindustrial values without making the climate of any region much worse off.

Climate researchers around the world will continue studying both and the potential impacts of intervening through geoengineering so that governments can make informed decisions about the different options that can be used to address climate change.

Explore further: Scientists develop feedback technique to manage uncertainties in solar geoengineering

More information: Kravitz B, D MacMartin, A Robock, P Rasch, K Ricke, J Cole, C Curry, P Irvine, D Ji, D Keith, J Egill Kristjánsson, J Moore, H Muri, B Singh, S Tilmes, S Watanabe, S Yang, and J-H Yoon. 2014. "A Multi-Model Assessment of Regional Climate Disparities Caused by Solar Geoengineering." Environmental Research Letters 9:074013. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/7/074013.

Related Stories

Effects of sea spray geoengineering on global climate

February 14, 2012

Anthropogenic climate warming is leading to consideration of options for geoengineering to offset rising carbon dioxide levels. One potential technique involves injecting artificial sea spray into the atmosphere. The sea ...

Is nuclear power the only way to avoid geoengineering?

April 23, 2014

"I think one can argue that if we were to follow a strong nuclear energy pathway—as well as doing everything else that we can—then we can solve the climate problem without doing geoengineering." So says Tom Wigley, one ...

Climate change: Can geoengineering satisfy everyone?

September 15, 2010

Reflecting sunlight from the Earth by geoengineering would undoubtedly cool the climate, but would different countries agree on how much to reflect? Research by climate scientists at the University of Bristol shows that the ...

Geoengineering could disrupt rainfall patterns

June 6, 2012

A geoengineering solution to climate change could lead to significant rainfall reduction in Europe and North America, a team of European scientists concludes. The researchers studied how models of the Earth in a warm, CO2‑rich ...

Recommended for you

Climate change made Harvey rainfall 15 percent more intense

December 14, 2017

A team of scientists from World Weather Attribution, including researchers from Rice University and other institutions in the United States and Europe, have found that human-caused climate change made the record rainfall ...

Hydraulic fracturing negatively impacts infant health

December 13, 2017

From North Dakota to Ohio to Pennsylvania, hydraulic fracturing, also known as fracking, has transformed small towns into energy powerhouses. While some see the new energy boom as benefiting the local economy and decreasing ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.