Google seeks help defining 'Right to be Forgotten'
by Alan Clendenning
Google Chairman Eric Schmidt and a panel of experts held the first of seven public sessions Tuesday to help the company define how it should enforce a new "Right to be Forgotten" rule under which Europeans can seek the removal of embarrassing search results.
The company has received more than 120,000 requests to take down 457,000 links since a May court ruling enabled Europeans to ask for the removal of embarrassing personal information that pops up in a search of their names.
"We need to balance the right to information against the rights of privacy," Schmidt said before he and other panel members heard testimony from Spanish privacy and right-to-know experts.
While Google says some decisions to remove or deny the removal of search results are relatively easy, the meetings across Europe are being held to help Google determine how to address European cases that fall into gray areas.
They include removal requests by former politicians criticized for their policies, criminals who don't want their convictions known, bad reviews for architects or teachers and comments people wrote about themselves that they now regret.
Google said Tuesday it could not immediately provide information on how many requests for takedowns have been approved and how many have been denied but said it would release the information soon.
European regulators expect to release guidelines next week on applying the EU court decision, said Isabelle Falque-Pierrotin, president of the French privacy regulator CNIL.
Falque-Pierrotin said coherent guidelines are needed but privacy regulators declined an invitation to join Google's panels.
"Google asked us to join as experts. We are not experts—we are regulators," she said from Paris. "We also want to hear other points of view and we will have our own consultation process."
Let us know if there is a problem with our content
Use this form if you have come across a typo, inaccuracy or would like to send an edit request for the content on this page.
For general inquiries, please use our contact form.
For general feedback, use the public comments section below (please adhere to guidelines).
Thank you for taking time to provide your feedback to the editors
Your feedback is important to us. However, we do not guarantee individual replies due to the high volume of messages.
Donate and enjoy an ad-free experience
We keep our content available to everyone.
Consider supporting Science X's mission by getting a premium account.
This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process
and policies.
Editors
have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:
Phys.org™ is a leading web-based science, research and technology news service which covers a full range of topics.
Phys.org is a part of Science X network.
With a global reach of over 10 million monthly readers and featuring dedicated websites for science (Phys.org),
technology (Tech Xplore) and medical research (Medical Xpress),
the Science X network is one of the largest online communities for science-minded people.