Climate change and the physics of falling icebergs

September 4, 2014 by Carol Clark, Emory University
Greenland's Ilulissat glacier is believed to have spawned the iceberg that brought down the Titanic. Credit: iStockphoto.com

For thousands of years, the massive glaciers of Earth's polar regions have remained relatively stable, the ice locked into mountainous shapes that ebbed in warmer months but gained back their bulk in winter. In recent decades, however, warmer temperatures have started rapidly thawing these frozen giants. It's becoming more common for sheets of ice, one kilometer tall, to shift, crack and tumble into the sea, splitting from their mother glaciers in an explosive process known as calving.

"Imagine a sheer, vertical ice face three times as tall as the tallest building in Atlanta breaking off from a glacier and flipping 90 degrees," says Emory physicist Justin Burton. "In my lab, we can calculate how much energy is released during one of these events, which can be equivalent to several nuclear bombs."

Burton studies the geophysics of calving icebergs in order to better understand and predict effects of climate change, such as sea-level rise.

"Ice coverage is one of the most sensitive indicators of climate change," he says. About half of the loss of ice from the is occurring due to melting and half due to . While it's more straightforward to estimate iceberg melt rates, their calving rates are much harder to pin down.

For the 2012 film "Chasing Ice," videographers endured subzero temperatures and years of patience to record stunning time-lapse footage of ancient glaciers receding. Their efforts also yielded the largest calving event ever captured on film. The area involved was about the size of Manhattan. The filmmakers described it as like watching skyscrapers rolling around in an earthquake and an entire city breaking apart before their eyes.

Direct field observations of calving icebergs are as dangerous as they are rare. So Burton and his colleagues developed ways to model these events in a controlled, laboratory setting. "We can measure things that can't be measured in the field," he explains, "and it's also way cheaper and safer."

He and his colleagues built a cylindrical, Plexiglas as a scaled-down version of a fjord, similar to the ice-walled channel at the end of the Ilulissat glacier, which drains the Greenland ice sheet into the ocean. This well-studied glacier, also known as Jakobshavn, is considered an important bellwether for .

While it is normal for glaciers to both accumulate and shed ice, Jakobshavn provides a vivid snapshot of how the shedding process has speeded up. The glacier retreated 8 miles during the 100-year period between 1902 and 2001, but has retreated more than 10 miles during the past decade. Greenland's ice sheet appears to be out of balance, losing more than it gains.

Burton's lab creates experimental models to gain a more precise understanding of these glacial processes. Rectangular plastic blocks that have the same density as icebergs are tipped in the water tank and the resulting hydrodynamics are recorded.

One hypothesis that the lab is investigating is how the waves unleashed by capsizing icebergs may be causing earthquakes that can be detected thousands of miles away. "It's counterintuitive," Burton says, "because usually you think of earthquakes as causing large waves and not the other way around."

The lab models, however, suggest that the violent rotation of massive icebergs generates waves that release the brunt of their energy onto the sheer vertical face of the glacier, instead of dispersing most of it into the ocean.

"If we can correlate the frequencies of earthquake signals with the frequencies of icebergs rocking back and forth in the water, then that could be a direct measurement of the size of the that have broken off," Burton explains. "Large iceberg calving events could then be detected and measured using remote seismic monitoring."

Climate change and its impacts is one of the top problems in science, Burton says. "We're seeing huge changes occurring within a few years and we've got to get on it. I'd like to think that, a few decades from now, we were able to do something."

Explore further: Greenland's fastest glacier reaches record speeds

Related Stories

Greenland's fastest glacier reaches record speeds

February 3, 2014

Jakobshavn Isbræ (Jakobshavn Glacier) is moving ice from the Greenland ice sheet into the ocean at a speed that appears to be the fastest ever recorded. Researchers from the University of Washington and the German Space ...

Retreat of Yakutat Glacier

August 21, 2014

Located in the Brabazon Range of southeastern Alaska, Yakutat Glacier is one of the fastest retreating glaciers in the world. It is the primary outlet for the 810-square kilometer (310-square mile) Yakutat ice field, which ...

Ice scientists study the birth of an iceberg

October 30, 2012

The moment of birth of an iceberg has been analysed in detail for the first time. A team of scientists from the University of St Andrews and Aberystwyth University has completed a detailed and thorough survey of the interface ...

Recommended for you

Ecosystems are getting greener in the Arctic

August 21, 2018

In recent decades, scientists have noted a surge in Arctic plant growth as a symptom of climate change. But without observations showing exactly when and where vegetation has bloomed as the world's coldest areas warm, it's ...

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

mememine69
1 / 5 (4) Sep 04, 2014
Real progressives don't condemn their own kids based on 32 years of science's "could be" a climate crisis and real progressives don't threaten their own children with the exaggerated greenhouse gas ovens of their exaggerated CO2 crisis just as an excuse to hissy fit hate neocons. Now who's the neocon?
Move on;
*Occupywallstreet now does not even mention CO2 in its list of demands because of the bank-funded and corporate run carbon trading stock markets ruled by politicians.
*Canada killed Y2Kyoto 2 years ago with a freely elected climate change denying prime minister and nobody cared, especially the millions of scientists warning us of unstoppable warming (a comet hit).
32 more years of "could" be the end of days is unsustainble in "belief". Deny that.
antigoracle
1 / 5 (5) Sep 04, 2014
The AGW Cult is truly desperate, as their shameless deception gets worse.
The world has actually cooled since the 1930s.
http://www.thereg...retreat/

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.