Hubble finds supernova star system linked to potential 'zombie star'

August 6, 2014
The two inset images show before-and-after images captured by NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope of Supernova 2012Z in the spiral galaxy NGC 1309. The white X at the top of the main image marks the location of the supernova in the galaxy. Credit: NASA, ESA

( —Using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope, a team of astronomers has spotted a star system that could have left behind a "zombie star" after an unusually weak supernova explosion.

A typically obliterates the exploding white dwarf, or dying star. On this occasion, scientists believe this faint supernova may have left behind a surviving portion of the dwarf star—a sort of zombie star.

While examining Hubble images taken years before the stellar explosion, astronomers identified a blue companion star feeding energy to a white dwarf, a process that ignited a nuclear reaction and released this weak supernova blast. This supernova, Type Iax, is less common than its brighter cousin, Type Ia. Astronomers have identified more than 30 of these mini-supernovas that may leave behind a surviving white dwarf.

"Astronomers have been searching for decades for the star systems that produce Type Ia supernova explosions," said scientist Saurabh Jha of Rutgers University in Piscataway, New Jersey. "Type Ia's are important because they're used to measure vast cosmic distances and the expansion of the universe. But we have very few constraints on how any white dwarf explodes. The similarities between Type Iax's and normal Type Ia's make understanding Type Iax progenitors important, especially because no Type Ia progenitor has been conclusively identified. This discovery shows us one way that you can get a white dwarf explosion."

The team's results will appear in the Thursday, Aug. 7 edition of the journal Nature.

The weak supernova, dubbed SN 2012Z, resides in the host galaxy NGC 1309 which is 110 million light-years away. It was discovered in the Lick Observatory Supernova Search in January 2012. Luckily, Hubble's Advanced Camera for Surveys also observed NGC 1309 for several years prior the supernova outburst, which allowed scientists to compare before-and-after images.

Curtis McCully, a graduate student at Rutgers and lead author of the team's paper, sharpened the Hubble pre-explosion images and noticed a peculiar object near the location of the supernova.

"I was very surprised to see anything at the location of the supernova. We expected the progenitor system would be too faint to see, like in previous searches for normal Type Ia supernova progenitors. It is exciting when nature surprises us," McCully said.

After studying the object's colors and comparing with computer simulations of possible Type Iax progenitor systems, the team concluded they were seeing the light of a star that had lost its outer hydrogen envelope, revealing its helium core.

The team plans to use Hubble again in 2015 to observe the area, giving time for the supernova's light to dim enough to reveal any possible zombie star and helium companion to confirm their hypothesis.

"Back in 2009, when we were just starting to understand this class, we predicted these supernovae were produced by a white dwarf and helium star binary system," said team member Ryan Foley of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, who helped identify Type Iax supernovae as a new class. "There's still a little uncertainty in this study, but it is essentially validation of our claim."

One possible explanation for the unusual nature of SN 2012Z is that a game of seesaw ensued between the bigger and smaller of the star pair. The more massive star evolved more quickly to expand and dump its hydrogen and helium onto the smaller star. The rapidly evolving star became a white dwarf. The smaller star bulked up, grew larger and engulfed the white dwarf. The outer layers of this combined star were ejected, leaving behind the white dwarf and the helium core of the companion star. The white dwarf siphoned matter from the companion star until it became unstable and exploded as a mini-supernova, leaving behind a surviving zombie star.

Astronomers already have located the aftermath of another Type Iax supernova blast. Images were taken with Hubble in January 2013 of supernova 2008ha, located 69 million light-years away in the galaxy UGC 12682, in more than four years after it exploded. The images show an object in the area of the supernova that could be the zombie star or the companion. The findings will be published in The Astrophysical Journal.

"SN 2012Z is one of the more powerful Type Iax supernovae and SN 2008ha is one of the weakest of the class, showing that Type Iax systems are very diverse," explained Foley, lead author of the paper on SN 2008ha. "And perhaps that diversity is related to how each of these explodes. Because these supernovae don't destroy the white dwarf completely, we surmise that some of these explosions eject a little bit and some eject a whole lot."

The astronomers hope their new findings will spur the development of improved models for these white dwarf explosions and a more complete understanding of the relationship between Type Iax and normal Type Ia supernovae and their corresponding star systems.

Explore further: Astronomers discover new kind of supernova

More information: Nature paper:

Related Stories

Astronomers discover new kind of supernova

March 26, 2013

( —Supernovae were always thought to occur in two main varieties. But a team of astronomers including Carnegie's Wendy Freedman, Mark Phillips and Eric Persson is reporting the discovery of a new type of supernova ...

Image: Hubble eyes a curious supernova in NGC 2441

July 2, 2014

( —This bright spiral galaxy is known as NGC 2441, located in the northern constellation of Camelopardalis (The Giraffe). However, NGC 2441 is not the only subject of this new Hubble image; the galaxy contains ...

Hubble monitors supernova in nearby galaxy M82

February 26, 2014

This is a Hubble Space Telescope composite image of a supernova explosion designated SN 2014J in the galaxy M82. At a distance of approximately 11.5 million light-years from Earth it is the closest supernova of its type discovered ...

New suspect identified in supernova explosion

June 4, 2014

( —Supernovas are often thought of as the tremendous explosions that mark the ends of massive stars' lives. While this is true, not all supernovas occur in this fashion. A common supernova class, called Type Ia, ...

Supernova progenitor found?

August 3, 2012

( -- Type Ia supernovae are violent stellar explosions. Observations of their brightness are used to determine distances in the universe and have shown scientists that the universe is expanding at an accelerating ...

Recommended for you

Video: A colorful 'landing' on Pluto

January 20, 2017

What would it be like to actually land on Pluto? This movie was made from more than 100 images taken by NASA's New Horizons spacecraft over six weeks of approach and close flyby in the summer of 2015. The video offers a trip ...

The evolution of massive galaxy clusters

January 20, 2017

Galaxy clusters have long been recognized as important laboratories for the study of galaxy formation and evolution. The advent of the new generation of millimeter and submillimeter wave survey telescopes, like the South ...

Freeze-dried food and 1 bathroom: 6 simulate Mars in dome

January 20, 2017

Crammed into a dome with one bathroom, six scientists will spend eight months munching on mostly freeze-dried foods—with a rare treat of Spam—and have only their small sleeping quarters to retreat to for solace.

Image: Wavemaker moon Daphnis

January 20, 2017

The wavemaker moon, Daphnis, is featured in this view, taken as NASA's Cassini spacecraft made one of its ring-grazing passes over the outer edges of Saturn's rings on Jan. 16, 2017. This is the closest view of the small ...

Astronomers search for signs of life on Wolf 1061 exoplanet

January 19, 2017

Is there anybody out there? The question of whether Earthlings are alone in the universe has puzzled everyone from biologists and physicists to philosophers and filmmakers. It's also the driving force behind San Francisco ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3.3 / 5 (7) Aug 07, 2014
What - no condescending remarks yet from the all-powerful, all-seeing EU group to tell us how ALL the astrophysicists in the world have got everything wrong with their moribund theories of supernovae?

How are we going to sleep at night until we're told it's all down to electric currents? and cathodes and anodes and all?? and plasmaz??? and Birkeland currents - take a look at the picture: there's clear signs of twisting currents there. No need to do any of that troublesome math: that's evidence, right there... right?

Come on, guys: tell us what's what!!!
2 / 5 (4) Aug 07, 2014
U pretty much nailed it. Nice work constant!
1 / 5 (2) Aug 08, 2014
"Since the time of Langmuir, we know that a double layer is a plasma formation by which a plasma — in the physical meaning of this word — protects itself from the environment. It is analogous to a cell wall by which a plasma — in the biological meaning of this word — protects itself from the environment. If an electric discharge is produced between a cathode and an anode there is a double layer, called a cathode sheath, produced near the cathode that accelerates electrons which carry a current through the plasma. A positive space charge separates the cathode sheath from the plasma. Similarly, a double layer is set up near the anode, protecting the plasma from this electrode. Again, a space charge constitutes the border between the double layer and the plasma. All these double layers carry electric currents." Alfven
There you go cupcake.

1 / 5 (2) Aug 08, 2014
"We put the theory in the textbooks because it sounds right. But we don't really know it's right, and I think people are beginning to worry," says Robert Kirshner, a supernova researcher at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA) in Cambridge, Massachusetts. "We keep saying the same thing, but the evidence for it doesn't get better, and that's a bad sign.""There's a lot of holes in the story." "I wouldn't say it's a crisis," "But if you ask, 'Are the pieces falling into place?' I'd say the answer is no."
"is a little bit of 'the emperor has no clothes,' " as Lars Bildsten, an astrophysicist at the Kavli Institute, put it.
Keep on nailing it!
3.4 / 5 (5) Aug 13, 2014
Right. So if we take a look at the study in the link provided, we're looking at magnetically-driven explosions, linked to plasma double layers (which surely nobody doubts exist) in the magnetospheres of stars or planets, and which are deemed by the authors of the linked study to be possible candidates for "some of the observed intense narrow-band cosmic radio emission [from stellar and planetary magnetospheres]". The study goes on to discuss the intensity, bandwidth and degree of polarization of such emissions, so those can be tested for by observation.

Nice to see the Über-Genius Alfvén being cited - not just once, but twice folks - in the study: well, that's because he did some important and fundamental work on plasmas and magnetohydrodynamics, which was his field. However, times move on, and the great man is buried as an irrelevance in the rest of the study, dated 1990.

3.4 / 5 (5) Aug 13, 2014
One of Alfvén's works cited in the study was a paper issued in Tellus 10, 1958, entitled "On the theory of Magnetic Storms and Aurorae" which deals, unsurprisingly, with magnetic storms and aurorae and which contains a lot of discussion and a smattering of high-school math. So, interactions of particles or cosmic rays with the Earth's magnetic field.

The other work cited in the linked study is a book he wrote in 1981 entitled "Cosmic Plasma" and, in the words of the author, was 'written according to the principle that "when rigour appears to conflict with simplicity, simplicity is given preference'. So, plenty of discussion of his ideas on cosmic plasmas, but he apparently did not feel the need to share any deep mathematical insights with his readers. In any case, Alfvén's (and Klein's) ideas on plasma cosmology have been shown in many cases to be inconsistent with observations made after 1981.

3.4 / 5 (5) Aug 13, 2014
So, on the one hand we have a report of a Type Iax supernova, with a total energy output probably in the region of 10exp42 Joules, driven by nuclear reactions (and that oh-so-weak-we-can-neglect-it gravity!). On the other hand, we have some theories on aurorae and emissions from magnetospheres dealing with energies MANY orders of magnitude less.

The nuclear reactions and the decay profiles and emission lines of short-lived species formed during the explosion can be followed in observation - standard nuclear physics (which simply confuse the EU/PC "battery" of electricians) explain these in great detail. Theories of aurorae and double-layer maser emissions from magnetospheres literally can't hold a candle to any of it.

If I'm to be a cupcake, my dear, those clinging mindlessly to the coat-tails of the EU/PC Great Men of Armchair Philosophy are mere sips of tepid water.
1 / 5 (2) Aug 14, 2014
Almost fifty years ago, Dr Charles Bruce of the UK Electrical Research Association identified planetary nebulae as bipolar electrical discharges from a central star, standard cosmology ignores these findings as well as the contradictions to every expectation of the thermonuclear fusion model for the sun.
I'm not sure what history your reading, but the Eighties was heyday for Alfven validations with instruments being put into space showing that the scientists who mocked and ridiculed were the true fools. Do a search and see how instrumental his contributions to physics and thinking still is today because your perspective is completely off, but I guess that's why I commented in the first place.
"...Mathematical theory, is only an approximation, applicable to specific situations, and thus has very real limits..."
3.4 / 5 (5) Aug 14, 2014
Charles Bruce - yet another electrical engineer of the 50's and 60's who imagined that he was gifted with the ability to comprehend truths hidden to the merely mortal astronomers / cosmologists / astrophysicists. In reality, he was yet another lame duck who jumped on the electrical cosmology bandwagon and who, like all the others in that runaway cart, could'nt come up with any verifiable predictions from theory based on physics and math.

I know what history you are reading - the hermetically-sealed world-view offered by websites like,,,,, etc. A small bunch of sites built and maintained by an even smaller group of committed electro-nutjobs, all quoting each other and their own "papers" (who needs peer-review?) and pamphlets in a merry-go-round of unverifiable "explanations", obfuscation and irrelevance. A lot of noise, signifying precisely nothing; and you're welcome to it all.

1 / 5 (2) Aug 15, 2014
Thank you. Feel better?
Charles was limited by small minded men, and like Alfven it took equipment in space to validate his work not some mathematical theory.
Thanks for the heads up, some awesome stuff. Amazing amounts of reference material!
3.4 / 5 (5) Aug 15, 2014
You're welcome! - you might also like to try the following:

* for more of the same,

* http://www.biblio...tronomia for a whole bunch of stuff which should be right up your alley;

* and a real personal favourite of mine, - been around a long time, written and maintained by the indefatigable Michael Mozina whose intransigence, blinkered vision and refusal to accept facts when they're presented to him must surely be held up by the EU/PC community as a model of a great man of vision "limited by small minded men".

Then, if you're up to the task of encompassing really high-powered alternative theories, do a search on the "Theory of everything using the Color", authored - I think he uses crayon - by Victor Elias Espinoza Guedez. Here's another article by him as a taster: - jaw-dropping stuff.

Have fun in the playground!
1 / 5 (2) Aug 16, 2014
Checked out those other links, some interesting ideas out there. Probably nothing any more wacky then big bangs and black holes if you really think about it.
The surface of the sun stuff was also interesting, but I'm partial to this guys take on it
Pierre-Marie Robitaille

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.