The five most poisonous substances

July 29, 2014 by Andrew Bissette, The Conversation
Feared for a good reason. Credit: viperskin, CC BY-NC-SA

With the announcement of an inquiry into the murder of Alexander Litvinenko, talk of poisons is back in the news. There are many articles with lists of the most poisonous substances, which are often gathered based on their acute toxicity as measured by something called LD50. But acute toxicity is only one factor that needs to be considered, and relying solely on LD50 or similar measures is overly simplistic.

LD50 is a measure of the dose of a substance needed to kill half of a given population, usually of mice. It is usually measured in dosage needed per unit weight of the animal. This seems a cruel but objective way to quantify how deadly a given substance is, but overall toxicity is more complex than that.

Toxicologists are aware of the limitations of LD50, and for technical, ethical, and legal reasons, measuring that values in animals is increasingly less common. So here is a list of substances that are more poisonous than their LD50 values might indicate.

1. Botulinum toxins

Even though some of them are used in the cosmetic industry (including in botox), the botulinum family of neurotoxins includes the most known to man. The LD50 values reported for these seven proteins are about 5 ng/kg (ng stands for nanogram, which is a billionth of a gram).

Non-lethal quantities injected into mice can paralyse the affected limb for as long as a month. The exquisite selectivity of these toxins for certain types of cells in the human body is remarkable, but also means that many species (including all invertebrates) are simply unaffected.

2. Snake toxins

Like botulinum toxins, most snake venoms are a mixture of many proteins which are often neurotoxins with LD50s below 1 mg/kg. A crucial complication here, however, is the speed of activity. While some snake venoms may be highly potent, other, less potent venoms might kill faster. This is vital information. A potent but slow-acting venom might leave enough time to intervene, while a fast-acting poison with a lower LD50 might kill you before you can get help.

3. Arsenic

Elemental arsenic has an LD50 of around 13 mg/kg – orders of magnitude higher than some of the substances on this list. Despite that, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry gives it the top rank on its priority list of hazardous substances.

This highlights a key consideration – how common a substance is and how likely you are to be exposed to it. Ex-spies notwithstanding, your odds of being exposed to polonium or botulinum in lethal quantities are negligible. But chronic exposure to is a real problem for many people around the world, and a simple measure of acute lethality such as LD50 simply cannot capture this.

4. Polonium-210

The radioisotope used to kill Alexander Litvinenko is extraordinarily toxic even in quantities less than a billionth of a gram. The LD50 of this compound is not a property of its chemistry. While other toxic metals such as and arsenic kill through the interaction of the metal with the body, polonium kills by emitting radiation which shreds sensitive biomolecules, such as DNA, and kills cells. Its half-life – the time taken for half of the ingested material to decay – is about a month, leading to a slow death by radiation poisoning.

5. Mercury

The harmful effects of mercury are perhaps most famously exemplified by Lewis Carroll's Mad Hatter, who was chronically exposed to mercury while plying his trade. But the toxicity of mercury is actually far more complicated, depending critically upon the kind of mercury involved. Organic and inorganic mercury compounds have different effects and hence LD50 values (which are typically between 1mg/kg and 100 mg/kg).

Pure mercury is considerably less toxic, as dramatically illustrated by the case of a dental worker who attempted suicide by injecting the liquid element into her veins. Ten months later she was effectively symptom-free, despite having mercury distributed throughout her lungs.

Explore further: Explainer: What are chemical weapons?

Related Stories

Explainer: What are chemical weapons?

May 24, 2013

There was chaos on the streets of Halajba in March 1988. In this corner of Iraq, at the time Iraqi Kurdistan, people had suddenly started experiencing cold-like symptoms – tight chest and nasal congestion. Within a few ...

Arafat may have been poisoned, but what is polonium?

November 7, 2013

A Swiss forensic report of the exhumed remains of ex-Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat today suggests polonium poisoning may have been the cause of death – but what is polonium, and why is it so deadly?

WHO launches drive against mercury thermometers

October 11, 2013

The World Health Organization and campaigners launched a drive Friday to try to wipe out mercury in medical thermometers, a day after nations signed a UN treaty to control the toxic liquid metal.

Recommended for you

The pace at which the world's permafrost soils are warming

January 16, 2019

Global warming is causing increasing damage in the world's permafrost regions. As the new global comparative study conducted by the international permafrost network GTN-P shows, in all regions with permafrost soils the temperature ...

Sewers could help clean the atmosphere

January 16, 2019

Sewage treatment—an unglamorous backbone of urban living—could offer a cost-effective way to combat climate change by flushing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Jul 29, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
5 / 5 (3) Jul 29, 2014
LOL Where's Plutonium? Michio Kaka is spinning in his grave, has been since Cassini-Huygens succeeded.

Did you mean "Michio Kaku", and isn't he still alive?
2 / 5 (4) Jul 29, 2014

"writers and scientists, often with far less publicity, have published detailed analyses of these claims and used statistics and experience to prove them totally false.... During the Manhattan Project in 1944 and 1945, 26 men accidentally ingested plutonium in quantities that far exceeded what is now considered to be a lethal dose... As of 1987, more than four decades later, only four of the workers had died and only one death was caused by cancer."

"... there is general agreement among experts in the field that this is incorrect. As of 2003, there has yet to be a single human death officially attributed to plutonium exposure. Naturally-occurring radium is about 200 times more radiotoxic than plutonium, and some organic toxins like Botulism toxin are billions of times more toxic than plutonium."

Ralph Nader started this myth .
Jul 29, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
2.6 / 5 (5) Jul 29, 2014
Mouth, why don't you truck on over to Hanford and try a mouthful? Let us know...
Why dont you eat me and see if you puke toad? Better stick to flies.
1 / 5 (1) Aug 03, 2014
"Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. But you still don't want to get any on you. " - Scott Adams

Also this list is kind of lame. Mercury isn't all that poisonous, but methyl mercury is. (Don't worry, it's organic.) Sarin nerve gas should also have been on this list. (Sorry, I only ingest natural poisons.) I'm pretty sure astatine would be incredibly poisonous, too, what with having a half-life of 8 hours, but nobody has gotten enough of it in one place to really test it properly.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.