Computer simulations show how fundamental particles can behave like electrons in a superconductor

Computer simulations show how fundamental particles can behave like electrons in a superconductor
Figure 1: Fundamental particles such as quarks could behave very differently under the extreme conditions found at the center of stars. Credit: James Thew/iStock/Thinkstock

The protons and neutrons that make up the nucleus of an atom are themselves made up of fundamental particles known as quarks. Under everyday conditions, quarks exist only in pairs or triplets called hadrons. In high-energy environments such as those at the center of neutron stars or in particle accelerators like the Large Hadron Collider, however, quarks can exist as semifree particles. Arata Yamamoto from the RIKEN Nishina Center for Accelerator-Based Science has now used supercomputer simulations to show that quarks can behave like electrons in a superconductor.

The existence of quarks in a semifree state under extreme conditions raises the fascinating question of whether quarks can behave like other free particles such as electrons. Electrons have a property called spin, which can be oriented either up or down. In some materials and at low temperatures, electrons with opposite spin and opposite momentum form interacting pairs called Cooper pairs, which are responsible for superconductivity. Quarks, on the other hand, are characterized by their 'flavor', which can take one of six values: up, down, charm, strange, top and bottom. Protons, for example, consist of two up quarks and a down quark.

Yamamoto investigated whether the pairing of an up and a down quark, which together form a hadron called a pion, could exhibit similar behavior to a Cooper pair. "I used computer simulations to investigate superconductivity in hadron physics," says Yamamoto.

The interaction between quarks is described by a complex theory known as quantum chromodynamics (QCD). Yamamoto performed the computationally intensive QCD simulations using the RIKEN Integrated Cluster of Clusters facility—a supercomputer comprising multiple computer clusters connected by a high-speed network.

Yamamoto started by investigating a system with a balanced number of up and down quarks, as quantified by the chemical potential, or the energy of the most excited particle in a system. The results showed that when the chemical potentials of the up and down quarks are equal in magnitude, the pions all exist in the same energy state. This 'condensate' state is a signature of a superconductor. When the chemical potentials of the two quarks were brought out of balance, however, the condensate state disappeared. The results demonstrate that, similar to , can form Cooper-like pairs under certain conditions.

Explore further

Hunting the unseen

More information: Yamamoto, A. "Lattice QCD with mismatched Fermi surfaces." Physical Review Letters 112, 162002 (2014). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.162002
Journal information: Physical Review Letters

Provided by RIKEN
Citation: Computer simulations show how fundamental particles can behave like electrons in a superconductor (2014, June 20) retrieved 25 April 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jun 20, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Jun 21, 2014
Here is a layman's question. Can such pairing phenomenon be achieved in plasma of tokamak reactors, or can it only be achieved in big particle accelerators? Where is energy threshold where pairing phenomenon occurs?

Wikipedia states (http://en.wikiped...Tokamak) that plasma in tokamak is heated to 10keV. Document (http://accelconf....-43.pdf) proposes plasma heating system for ITER to be heated to 1.5MeV.
LHC accelerates particles to 3.5 TeV (http://www.hephy....ators/).
My thinking is: could this pairing phenomenon somehow ease the task of achieving nuclear fusion? Or is energy input required for it too big to be efficient?

Jun 21, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more