Researchers suggest Greenland ice shelf melting faster due to embedded dust particles

June 9, 2014 by Bob Yirka, report
Melting snow containing light absorbing impurities. Credit: Florent Dominé

( —A team of planetary scientists with members from several research centers in France, has developed a theory that suggests that one of the reasons that Greenland's ice shelf is melting faster than models suggest, is because of embedded dust particles that hold more heat. In their paper published in the journal Nature Geoscience, the researchers describe how an analysis of satellite data over a several year period (2009-2013) convinced them that dust particles in the ice are responsible for the accelerated loss of ice covering the island.

Scientists have known for some time that the edges of the Greenland's are slowly melting due to global warming, but recently, they've begun to uncover evidence that suggests the interior of the shelf is melting too—a worrisome finding because it could mean higher ocean levels sooner than most models have predicted. Greenland's interior is both mountainous and is located at a high latitude, which means temperatures remain below freezing all year around. But, that's not enough apparently, to keep the ice from melting anyway. This, the researchers on this new effort, claim, is because dust from parts of the arctic that have seen ice disappear over the past decade blows onto the ice shelf and becomes embedded in the ice. When the sun shines on the ice, more of the heat is absorbed by the and held, causing some of the ice on top of the shelf to melt.

Prior to this new effort, scientists have attributed a darker looking Greenland, as seen from satellites, to an increase in ice crystal granule size, which they note, comes about due to slightly higher temperatures, as the atmosphere over the island, like the rest of the planet, slowly warms. This new research contradicts that theory and suggests Greenland's ice shelf is melting faster than anyone else has predicted. As the ice covering melts, sea levels rise—just how fast has been a matter of opinion, with different models offering different estimates. The researchers on this new effort suggest that as the arctic warms, and more ice near the edges melts, exposing bare ground, more dust will settle inland, causing more warming, and on and on creating a cycle that likely will only end when the entire shelf is bereft of . If that happens, sea levels would rise as much as 24 feet, inundating many coastal urban areas and completely covering many islands that are now inhabited by people.

Albedo measurement at Summit, Greenland. Credit: Florent Dominé

Explore further: Study suggests large waves may have bigger role in breaking up polar sea ice than thought

More information: Contribution of light-absorbing impurities in snow to Greenland's darkening since 2009, Nature Geoscience (2014) DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2180

The surface energy balance and mass balance of the Greenland Ice Sheet depends on the albedo of snow, which governs the amount of solar energy that is absorbed. The observed decline of Greenland's albedo over the past decade1, 2, 3 has been attributed to an enhanced growth of snow grains as a result of atmospheric warming1, 2. Satellite observations show that, since 2009, albedo values even in springtime at high elevations have been lower than the 2003–2008 average. Here we show, using a numerical snow model, that the decrease in albedo cannot be attributed solely to grain growth enhancement. Instead, our analysis of remote sensing data indicates that the springtime darkening since 2009 stems from a widespread increase in the amount of light-absorbing impurities in snow, as well as in the atmosphere. We suggest that the transport of dust from snow-free areas in the Arctic that are experiencing earlier melting of seasonal snow cover4 as the climate warms may be a contributing source of impurities. In our snow model simulations, a decrease in the albedo of fresh snow by 0.01 leads to a surface mass loss of 27 Gt yr−1, which could induce an acceleration of Greenland's mass loss twice as large as over the past two decades5. Future trends in light-absorbing impurities should therefore be considered in projections of Greenland mass loss.

Related Stories

Earth from space: Ice in motion

October 4, 2013

Clouds blur our view of the snow below in parts of this image acquired over the southern tip of Greenland by the Landsat-8 satellite on 30 May.

Flow of research on ice sheets helps answer climate questions

February 16, 2013

Just as ice sheets slide slowly and steadily into the ocean, researchers are returning from each trip to the Arctic and Antarctic with more data about climate change, including information that will help improve current models ...

Recommended for you

Rainfall's natural variation hides climate change signal

February 22, 2018

New research from The Australian National University (ANU) and ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science suggests natural rainfall variation is so great that it could take a human lifetime for significant climate ...

Seasonal patterns in the Amazon explained

February 22, 2018

Environmental scientists at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Brookhaven National Laboratory have led an international collaboration to improve satellite observations of tropical forests.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1.4 / 5 (10) Jun 09, 2014
They can't even tell how fast a block of ice is melting here on earth and people want me to believe in the big bang theory and the universe is expanding...NEVER!!
3.8 / 5 (5) Jun 09, 2014
Illustration example of it. At many areas the snow layer is actually darker than the ordinary rock and it indeed absorbs more heat. But not all dirt comes from human activity, the micrometeorites and dust from arid areas are involved there too.
3.9 / 5 (7) Jun 09, 2014
When man's UN-natural Industrial Activity adds atmospheric 'nutritive fallout' pollutants/particulates to prior natural 'background levels' of atmospheric 'volcanic ash' and dust-storm etc 'fallout', not only does the ice get 'dirty' and absorb more radiation, it also gets 'darker' still afterwards from the lichen etc which now can live in the upper layers of the dirty ice which now contain more nutrients.

The light absorbing and hence ice-melting rate is thus increased via this double-whammy 'darkening' from both dirt and lichen etc pigmentation. Unfortunately the 'discoloring' Lichen etc metabolism in those conditions does not remove enough CO2 from the atmosphere to balance the effect on climate overall. So the ice warms and any dissolved 'ice-bound' CO2 is released. And so on interconnected 'cascade effects' from even the most simplistic-seeming changes in environment/air pollution from man's over-reaching and unsustainable global industrial/agricultural/mining/fishing activity.
5 / 5 (6) Jun 09, 2014
They can't even tell how fast a block of ice is melting here on earth and people want me to believe in the big bang theory and the universe is expanding...NEVER!!

They figured how to make a computer circuits and international communications systems so that you can complain instantly though, thats something.
5 / 5 (5) Jun 10, 2014
The fact that Greenland is melting at all demonstrates the ferocity of global warming. A change in the Greenland ICE sheet's albedo certainly could distort observations from computer models. It would imply though, that sea level rise while occur much faster than computer models predict as well as the potential disruption of some of the oceans currents from the massive freshwater runoff.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.