Fewer US nuclear plants could curb climate change fight

May 7, 2014 by Jean-Louis Santini
An aerial view of a nuclear power plant in Pottstown, Pennsylvania, on March 25, 2011

Nuclear power plants in the United States increasingly risk closure amid growing competition from cheap natural gas, which experts said could hamper President Barack Obama's efforts to combat climate change.

The White House on Tuesday urged action to fight the repercussions of emissions, warning that human-caused warming was already having a serious impact.

But an increase in the exploitation of abundantly available shale gas could mean that nuclear power plants—which do not emit greenhouse gases and accounted for 19 percent of US electricity production in 2013—could see cuts.

Aside from , whose prices have dropped since 2009, new regulations put in place after Japan's 2011 Fukushima disaster and tax benefits for wind power production have also dented the competitiveness of atomic , according to the sector.

These factors are casting doubt on the construction of new —six are to be built by 2020.

Four nuclear reactors were shuttered in the United States between 2010 and 2013 with some 10 others possibly facing the same fate in the coming years, Doug Vine, senior energy fellow at the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, told AFP.

"Each nuclear reactor retirement makes it more difficult for the US to achieve its climate pledge to reduce emissions 17 percent below the 2005 level by 2020," as announced by Obama in 2009, "and to achieve even greater reduction necessary over the longer term to avoid the worst effect of climate change," said Vine, who co-authored a recent report on the topic.

US second biggest CO2 emitter

The United States is the second biggest emitter of carbon dioxide after China. And even if the burning of natural gas produces 50 percent less of that greenhouse gas than coal, it does contribute to global warming.

The latest report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the world has a likely chance of meeting the UN's warming limit of two degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) if it cuts annual 40-70 percent by 2050, especially from energy.

There would need to be a "tripling to nearly a quadrupling" in the share of energy from renewable and nuclear sources and from traditional fossil or new biofuel sources whose emissions are captured, it said.

In February, the Nuclear Energy Institute, which represents the industry, said "absent necessary changes in policies and practices, this situation has implications for reliability, longterm stability of electricity price and our ability to meet environmental goals."

Fossil energy sources generate about 66 percent of electricity in the United States—39 percent from coal plants and 27 percent from gas plants.

The rest is roughly derived from nuclear (19 percent) and sources such as hydroelectric (6.2 percent), wind (4 percent), geothermal (0.41 percent) and solar (0.02 percent).

"We need to keep ramping up renewables, but they can't meet our need for reliable power 24/7," said Eileen Claussen, president of the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions.

What's more, she added, nuclear is "carbon-free."

Michael Jacobs, senior energy analyst at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said "the renewable energy sector could compensate the loss of energy provided by nuclear plants (but) only if they get the support in tax credit."

"If policies were supportive, renewable energy can provide 10 to 15 percent of US electricity," he said.

Jacobs added that while the renewable energy tax credit "comes and goes every two years," the fossil fuel tax support "is unchanged and constant."

In reference to current nuclear plants, "we don't believe they maintain that safety requirement," he said.

As for Vine, he acknowledged there were risks associated with nuclear power.

"But we feel that risk from unmitigated CO2 emissions into the atmosphere and the risk of are far, far greater than the risk associate with ," he said.

Explore further: German greenhouse gas emissions rose in 2012

Related Stories

German greenhouse gas emissions rose in 2012

February 25, 2013

Germany saw increased emissions in greenhouse gases last year due to more coal and gas usage while the country seeks to develop its renewable energy sources, officials said Monday.

Americans using more energy, analysis shows

April 2, 2014

(Phys.org) —Americans used more renewable, fossil and even nuclear energy in 2013, according to the most recent energy flow charts released by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

CO2 emissions 'increased at slower rate in 2012'

October 31, 2013

The world's carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions increased at a slower rate in 2012—1.1 percent compared to a 2.9 percent annual increase over the past decade, a report said Thursday.

Japan posts top growth in clean energy

April 3, 2014

Japan last year stepped up spending on clean energy at a faster rate than any other country, despite a drop in the world's overall investment, a study said Thursday.

Experts say nuclear power needed to slow warming

November 3, 2013

Some of the world's top climate scientists say wind and solar energy won't be enough to head off extreme global warming, and they're asking environmentalists to support the development of safer nuclear power as one way to ...

Recommended for you

Volvo to supply Uber with self-driving cars (Update)

November 20, 2017

Swedish carmaker Volvo Cars said Monday it has signed an agreement to supply "tens of thousands" of self-driving cars to Uber, as the ride-sharing company battles a number of different controversies.

New method analyzes corn kernel characteristics

November 17, 2017

An ear of corn averages about 800 kernels. A traditional field method to estimate the number of kernels on the ear is to manually count the number of rows and multiply by the number of kernels in one length of the ear. With ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1.5 / 5 (2) May 07, 2014
also this type of nuclear reactor can be used where it got no heat exchange to the environment and with only Goldcore at most reaches about 100°C http://samuel-hei...eii-more

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.