Study shows men and women both biased against women's math abilities

March 11, 2014 by Bob Yirka report
Credit: (c) 2014 PNAS, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314788111

( —A study conducted by business and economic researchers Ernesto Reuben, Paola Sapienza, and Luigi Zingales, has found that both men and women hold biases against women's math abilities. In their paper published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the researchers describe a study they undertook using volunteers posing as either employers or job seekers and how it revealed biases that likely lead to fewer women being hired for jobs that require math abilities.

In 2008 a team of analyzed the results of national standardized tests taken by 15 year old students around the world. They found that while male students as a whole tended to score higher than their female counterparts, the gap between the two narrowed to nearly zero in countries where students of both genders received equal math training. This suggested of course, that there is no inherent difference in ability between the genders.

Two of the researchers from the earlier study, Zingales and Sapienza along with Reuben decided to revisit the issue by undertaking a new study. They enlisted the assistance or nearly two hundred volunteers, some of whom served as employers looking to hire, others as those looking to be hired.

In one experiment, employers were asked to choose whom they would hire between two candidates, one male and one female, when all they had to go on was appearance. Both male and female employers chose the male candidate twice as often. In another experiment, the prospective employees were asked to describe their mathematical capabilities to the employer. The result was nearly the same. The researchers pointed out that the male tended to brag about their skills while the female seekers tended to understate theirs. In a third experiment, employers were give test scores achieved by those looking for a job and despite those scores being nearly equal, men still got the job one and half times more often.

All of the employers were also asked to take what is known as an Implicit Association Test, which reveals biases between associated items. In this case, it was a bias against women and math. The researchers found that those that showed the most bias on the test tended to be the most biased in choosing who to hire.

The study team claims their research clearly shows that a bias exists in both against women and that it likely is a primary reason that so few women get hired in jobs like engineering that require a high degree of skills and why so few choose to go into such fields of study.

Explore further: Female students just as successful as males in math and science, Asian Americans outperform all

More information: How stereotypes impair women's careers in science, Ernesto Reuben, PNAS, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1314788111

Women outnumber men in undergraduate enrollments, but they are much less likely than men to major in mathematics or science or to choose a profession in these fields. This outcome often is attributed to the effects of negative sex-based stereotypes. We studied the effect of such stereotypes in an experimental market, where subjects were hired to perform an arithmetic task that, on average, both genders perform equally well. We find that without any information other than a candidate's appearance (which makes sex clear), both male and female subjects are twice more likely to hire a man than a woman. The discrimination survives if performance on the arithmetic task is self-reported, because men tend to boast about their performance, whereas women generally underreport it. The discrimination is reduced, but not eliminated, by providing full information about previous performance on the task. By using the Implicit Association Test, we show that implicit stereotypes are responsible for the initial average bias in sex-related beliefs and for a bias in updating expectations when performance information is self-reported. That is, employers biased against women are less likely to take into account the fact that men, on average, boast more than women about their future performance, leading to suboptimal hiring choices that remain biased in favor of men.

Related Stories

Marie Curie, go home: Science faculty study shows bias

September 21, 2012

(—A study published in PNAS shows that science faculty members, both men and women, need to bring up their poor grades in gender bias. The study. "Science Faculty's Subtle Gender Biases Favor Male Students," reveals ...

Math teachers demonstrate a bias toward white male students

April 16, 2012

While theories about race, gender, and math ability among high school students have long been debated, a recent study found that math teachers are in fact, unjustifiably biased toward their white male students. This study ...

Men support cracking glass ceiling

November 12, 2013

Male workers appear to support women becoming CEOs even more than female workers do, finds new research on the proverbial glass ceiling and job satisfaction in six formerly socialist countries.

Recommended for you

Industrial "edge cities" have helped China grow

August 18, 2017

China's massive investment in industrial parks has paid economic dividends while reshaping the urban areas where they are located, according to a newly published study co-authored by an MIT expert on urban economics.

Ancient species of giant sloth discovered in Mexico

August 17, 2017

Mexican scientists said Wednesday they have discovered the fossilized remains of a previously unknown species of giant sloth that lived 10,000 years ago and died at the bottom of a sinkhole.

The mathematics of golf

August 16, 2017

(—The official Rules of Golf, which are continually being revised and updated as new equipment emerges, have close ties to mathematics. In many cases, math is used to place limitations on golf equipment, such as ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Mar 12, 2014
Yeah, I'm sure engineering firms hire kids out of school based on their dress/appearance and ignore their grades. Lousy article. Intentionally conflates two meanings (one with an emotional/political connotation) of the term "bias". If 51% of people from the group A are known to be BS Engineers and 49% of the people from group B are known to be BS Engineers, given the choice between two people, and the only thing you knew about them was one is an A the other is a B, which would you choose? This is obvious.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.