Alaska mine could be blocked to save salmon fisheries

March 1, 2014
File photo shows a salmon swimming up a stream in Alaska

US environmental authorities made a rare move Friday to block a massive copper and gold mine in Alaska before it even gets under way, in a bid to protect wild salmon.

The Pebble Mine project has the potential to be one of the biggest open pit copper mines, but once built, it could threaten the exceptionally rich salmon fishery in the Bristol Bay area, the Environmental Protection Agency explained in a statement.

"Extensive scientific study has given us ample reason to believe that the Pebble Mine would likely have significant and irreversible negative impacts on the Bristol Bay watershed and its abundant salmon fisheries," said EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy.

The EPA action could lead to an unprecedented federal ban on a mining project before the company behind it even puts in a permit request.

"This process is not something the agency does very often, but Bristol Bay is an extraordinary and unique resource," McCarthy said, calling it the "world's most productive salmon fishery."

Bristol Bay produces half the wild sockeye in the world, an average of 37.5 million fish per year, in part because of the exceptional water quality in the streams and wetlands there.

Plans call for the mine to be built near the headwaters of two rivers whose fisheries produce about $480 million of fish and employ some 14,000 people.

In order to move forward, the mine's promoters would need to show that their activities wouldn't threaten the ecosystem.

The EPA move is a victory for environmental activists, fisheries and indigenous groups who had been fighting the mining project for the past three years.

But Republican leaders in Alaska, including Governor Sean Parnell and Senator Lisa Murkowski disapproved, with Murkowski warning the EPA action could set a "terrible precedent."

Promoters of the Pebble project say the region holds one of the world's largest and richest mineral gold and copper deposits, which could produce 36 million tonnes of copper and more than 3,000 tonnes of gold within the next 30 years.

The EPA carried out a large-scale study starting three years ago to evaluate the potential impact of mining on the Bristol Bay ecosystem.

The final report was completed in January and contains 1.1 million public comments as well as the analysis of two independent expert panels.

Explore further: After millennia of mining, copper nowhere near 'peak'

Related Stories

After millennia of mining, copper nowhere near 'peak'

July 3, 2013

New research shows that existing copper resources can sustain increasing world-wide demand for at least a century, meaning social and environmental concerns could be the most important restrictions on future copper production.

Chile president gives nod to huge gold mine

May 30, 2013

Chile's visiting president said Thursday that Canadian firm Barrick Gold can resume operations at its massive gold mine in Chile as long as environmental rules are followed.

Copper making salmon prone to predators

July 10, 2012

Minute amounts of copper from brake linings and mining operations can affect salmon to where they are easily eaten by predators, says a Washington State University researcher. Jenifer McIntyre found the metal affects salmon's ...

Coal industry fumes as US revokes mining permit

January 14, 2011

The withdrawal of a permit for a controversial "mountaintop removal" coal mining operation has sparked outrage in the US industry, but was hailed as a victory for environmental protection and the health of nearby communities.

Researcher shows fishing has reduced salmon size in Alaska

June 8, 2011

( -- Neala Kendall, a graduate student from the University of Washington in Seattle, after studying cannery data on sockeye salmon harvested from Bristol Bay in Alaska, has discovered that the length of the average ...

Recommended for you

Hot spot at Hawaii? Not so fast

August 18, 2017

Through analysis of volcanic tracks, Rice University geophysicists have concluded that hot spots like those that formed the Hawaiian Islands aren't moving as fast as recently thought.

Supervolcanoes: A key to America's electric future?

August 16, 2017

Most of the lithium used to make the lithium-ion batteries that power modern electronics comes from Australia and Chile. But Stanford scientists say there are large deposits in sources right here in America: supervolcanoes.

Greenland ice flow likely to speed up

August 16, 2017

Flow of the Greenland Ice Sheet is likely to speed up in the future, despite a recent slowdown, because its outlet glaciers slide over wet sediment, not hard rock, new research based on seismic surveys has confirmed. This ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Mar 01, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Mar 01, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Mar 01, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Mar 01, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
The Shootist
1 / 5 (9) Mar 01, 2014
Maybe we should give Alaska back to the Russians. At least their government isn't run by bureaucrats.
Mar 01, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
1.4 / 5 (10) Mar 01, 2014
yup, jobs are not important to Obama.
yup, affordable health care is not important to Obama.
yup, treaties with American Allies is not important to Obama.
yup, rule of law is not important to Obama.

what is important to Obama?
4.6 / 5 (10) Mar 01, 2014
Are any of you aware of just how much damage a mining operation like this causes?
Ever seen an actual pit mine?
Do you know what kinds of toxic materials are used to separate metals from ore?
Do you understand what kinds of infrastructure would have to dug out in this pristine terrain to support an operation of this size?
Do you understand that the mining tip has to dumped nearby as operations proceed?
Do you understand the effects of spills, leaching, runoff and sedimentation on the watershed and marine environments? Air pollution?
Do you understand what it means to lose a way of life?

Obviously not -so it's a very good thing, indeed, that there are those who do, and understand that short-term profiteering doesn't justify the long term loss that this project would cause.

There is plenty of gold, silver, and copper in Ontario, where the impact of mining can be much better managed.
5 / 5 (11) Mar 01, 2014
Salmon fisheries are a renewable resource, PITS, whatever you take out of them, are not. Thank goodness there seems to be a part of government that works. Hope the decision sticks.
1 / 5 (8) Mar 01, 2014
Yup, mining bad, metals bad, work is bad, jobs are bad, chemicals are bad, humans are bad. Lets get our minerals from other countries that don't care at all for the environment. This makes us dependent on our enemies, weakens us, all while hurting the environment a whole lot worse. Yup makes a lot of sense if you are a environmentalist Progressive.

Remember every time you breath that the EPA says CO2 is a bad chemical that needs to be regulated.

5 / 5 (9) Mar 01, 2014
The proposed site of the Pebble mine is a sulfide laden ore body located in a large delta in the Bristol Bay watershed. When water comes in contact with the sulfides they will turn into sulphuric acid and dissolve toxic metals, releasing them into Bristol bay. An 800+ foot tall earthen dam would be used to trap toxic mine tailings, right in an active seismic zone. From a technical standpoint, the odds for failure of the mines architecture and release of toxic metals into Bristol Bay are unacceptably high, and would turn Bristol Bay into a deadzone, destroy salmon spawning areas, and severely damage Alaska's commercial fishing industry. So what do you support, A Canadian mining company or Alaskan fishermen? All you troglodytes who think stopping pebble mine is about politics are obviously too stupid to comment on a scientific website like I live in Alaska, why do you that don't even care. Get a life.
5 / 5 (4) Mar 01, 2014
Great move. Downstream to the state of Washington such destruction by the Copper mine will cost Washington State between 4-8 Billion annually. Sorry, but that mine productivity doesn't compare.
Mar 01, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Mar 01, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
1 / 5 (3) Mar 02, 2014
5 / 5 (2) Mar 02, 2014

Was that just for a few sarcastic laughs, or are you really that stupid?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.