The role of synthetic biology in conversion of natural gas into clean fuel

February 7, 2014 by Mike Williams, Rice University

( —Rice University synthetic biologist Ramon Gonzalez sees a future – a near future, in fact – in which Americans get enough clean transportation fuel from natural gas to help make the nation energy independent.

As a program director with the Department of Energy's Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E), he's in a position to help make it happen.

In an article in this week's Science magazine, Gonzalez, an associate professor of chemical and biomolecular engineering, discusses his vision for the development of revolutionary bioconversion technologies for the production of liquid transportation fuels from natural gas. This vision is the basis for a program, Reducing Emissions Using Methanotrophic Organisms for Transportation Energy (REMOTE), developed by Gonzalez and his team at ARPA-E. The program currently supports 15 teams with a budget of approximately $35 million.

He and co-author Robert Conrado, a former senior fellow at ARPA-E, detailed the barriers that must be overcome for the United States to turn the methane-rich natural gas it produces in great abundance into fuel that remains liquid at room temperature – basically, a clean-burning, low-cost gasoline equivalent.

Gonzalez is in the first year of the agency's three-year commitment to create natural gas bioconversion technologies through REMOTE. "Our goal is to come up with things that are not on anyone's radar, completely new approaches that are transformational in nature," he said. "Natural gas is one of the most-abundant resources in the world, but until now the U.S. had invested very little in natural gas bioconversion research."

The United States produces more natural gas than any other country, but converting it to without throwing away most of the it contains is expensive, Gonzalez said. "The gas-to-liquids (GTL) technologies that exist today can only support technologically complex, multistep processes that need to operate at large scale, which means multimillion-dollar investments in each facility. It's probably economically viable today because natural gas is so cheap, but it's bad in terms of energy efficiency and emissions."

While bioconversion offers a potential solution to the large-scale, capital-intensive nature of the GTL approach, implementation of today's bioconversion technologies would lead to "wasting half of the energy and one-third of the carbon in methane during conversion to a liquid fuel and hence a huge carbon footprint," he said. "And when natural gas goes up in price, it won't be economically viable anymore."

REMOTE's goal is to solve both problems by getting the most energy out of natural gas with the least energy input. The key, Gonzalez said, is to engineer enzymes that efficiently "activate" carbon-hydrogen bonds in methane, the first step toward conversion. That involves the manipulation of microbial cells that alter materials at the molecular level.

"People have been trying really hard to do it for decades," he said. "I think it's going to happen within the life of the program – that is, within the first three years."

Next, he said, researchers will need an efficient way to convert activated, intermediate methane into liquid fuel in concert with the development of high-productivity bioreactors.

Gonzalez remains in charge of his Metabolic Engineering and Synthetic and Systems Biology Lab at Rice, but he has spent most of his working hours on REMOTE since joining ARPA-E 18 months ago. As program director, he and his team formulated a vision for REMOTE and created a road map to develop GTL technologies with high energy efficiency and a low carbon footprint. A successful program, he said, will support natural gas bioconversion facilities with low capital cost and at small scales, which in turn would enable the use of any resource, including those frequently flared, vented or emitted.

He said he hopes to fulfill the agency's mission by promoting revolutionary advances in both fundamental and applied sciences. "The development cycle for a truly new, transformative technology in the energy domain takes anywhere from five to 15 years to develop," Gonzalez said. "I would say the five-year time frame is optimistic, but I think by the end of this decade, technologies like the ones we're promoting with REMOTE should be in place."

One essential element is already in place: the infrastructure for delivering and using liquid fuel. Ideally, consumers would see no difference in the way they fill and run their cars. "I would be really happy if we could see something commercialized by the end of this decade," Gonzalez said.

Explore further: LLNL partnership with Calysta works to convert natural gas to liquid fuel

More information: "Envisioning the Bioconversion of Methane to Liquid Fuels." Robert J. Conrado, Ramon Gonzalez. Science 7 February 2014: Vol. 343 no. 6171 pp. 621-623. DOI: 10.1126/science.1246929

Related Stories

Collaboration puts natural gas on the road

March 18, 2013

DOE's Savannah River National Laboratory, in partnership with Ford Motor Company, the University of California-Berkeley, and BASF, has research underway to explore an innovative low-pressure material-based natural gas fuel ...

NREL working to clean air in fracking process

January 22, 2014

In the annals of impressive eating, there was The Cat That Swallowed the Canary and The Eggplant That Ate Chicago. Now, add The Microbe That Consumes the Methane.

NREL to help convert methane to liquid diesel

January 8, 2013

The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) will help develop microbes that convert methane found in natural gas into liquid diesel fuel, a novel approach that if successful could reduce ...

Recommended for you

Looking to the sun to create hydrogen fuel

January 18, 2018

When Lawrence Livermore scientist Tadashi Ogitsu leased a hydrogen fuel-cell car in 2017, he knew that his daily commute would change forever. There are no greenhouse gases that come out of the tailpipe, just a bit of water ...

The early bits of life

January 18, 2018

How can life originate before DNA and genes? One possibility is that there are natural processes that lead to the organisation of simple physical objects such as small microcapsules that undergo rudimentary forms of interaction, ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (1) Feb 07, 2014
I fail to see how this is going to be ecologically superior to using methane as a gas.You are still burning a fossil fuel,only now it is a liquid.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.