First detailed map of global forest change created

November 14, 2013
Forest loss in Sumatra's Riau province, Indonesia, 2000-2012. Credit: Hansen, Potapov, Moore, Hancher et al., 2013

A University of Maryland-led, multi-organizational team has created the first high-resolution global map of forest extent, loss and gain. This resource greatly improves the ability to understand human and naturally-induced forest changes and the local to global implications of these changes on environmental, economic and other natural and societal systems, members of the team say.

In a new study, the team of 15 university, Google and government researchers reports a global loss of 2.3 million square kilometers (888,000 square miles) of forest between 2000 and 2012 and a gain of 800,000 square kilometers (309,000 square miles) of new forest.

Their study, published online on November 14 in the journal Science, documents the new database, including a number of key findings on global forest change. For example, the tropics were the only climate domain to exhibit a trend, with increasing by 2,101 square kilometers (811 square miles) per year. Brazil's well-documented reduction in deforestation during the last decade was more than offset by increasing forest loss in Indonesia, Malaysia, Paraguay, Bolivia, Zambia, Angola and elsewhere.

"This is the first map of forest change that is globally consistent and locally relevant," says University of Maryland Professor of Geographical Sciences Matthew Hansen, team leader and corresponding author on the Science paper.

"Losses or gains in forest cover shape many important aspects of an ecosystem including, climate regulation, carbon storage, biodiversity and water supplies, but until now there has not been a way to get detailed, accurate, satellite-based and readily available data on forest cover change from local to global scales," Hansen says.

Forest Fires near Yakutsk, Russia, 2000-2012. Credit: Hansen, Potapov, Moore, Hancher et al., 2013

To build this first of its kind forest mapping resource, Hansen, UMD Research Associate Professor Petr Potapov and five other UMD geographical science researchers drew on the decades-long UMD experience in the use of satellite data to measure changes in forest and other types of land cover. Landsat 7 data from 1999 through 2012 were obtained from a freely available archive at the United States Geological Survey's center for Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS). More than 650,000 Landsat images were processed to derive the final characterization of forest extent and change.

The analysis was made possible through a collaboration with colleagues from Google Earth Engine, who implemented the models developed at UMD for characterizing the Landsat data sets. Google Earth Engine is a massively parallel technology for high-performance processing of geospatial data and houses a copy of the entire Landsat image catalog. What would have taken a single computer 15 years to perform was completed in a matter of days using Google Earth Engine computing.

Hansen and his coauthors say their mapping tool greatly improves upon existing knowledge of global forest cover by providing fine resolution (30 meter) maps that accurately and consistently quantify annual loss or gain of forest over more than a decade. This mapping database, which will be updated annually, quantifies all forest stand-replacement disturbances, whether due to logging, fire, disease or storms. And they say it is based on repeatable definitions and measurements while previous efforts at national and global assessments of forest cover have been largely dependent on countries' self-reported estimates based on widely varying definitions and measures of forest loss and gain.

Dynamics from local to regional to global scale are quantified. For example, subtropical forests were found to have the highest rates of change, largely due to intensive forestry land uses. The disturbance rate of North American subtropical forests, located in the Southeast United States, was found to be four times that of South American rainforests during the study period; more than 31 percent of U.S. southeastern forest cover was either lost or regrown. At national scales, Paraguay, Malaysia and Cambodia were found to have the highest rates of forest loss. Paraguay was found to have the highest ratio of forest loss to gain, indicating an intensive deforestation dynamic.

The study confirms that well-documented efforts by Brazil – which has long been responsible for a majority of the world's tropical deforestation – to reduce its rainforest clearing have had a significant effect. Brazil showed the largest decline in annual forest loss of any country, cutting annual forest loss in half, from a high of approximately 40,000 square kilometers (15,444 square miles) in 2003-2004 to 20,000 square kilometers (7,722 square miles) in 2010-2011. Indonesia had the largest increase in forest loss, more than doubling its annual loss during the study period to nearly 20,000 square kilometers (7,722 square miles) in 2011-2012.

Deforestation in Paraguay, 2000-2012. Credit: Hansen, Potapov, Moore, Hancher et al., 2013

Hansen and colleagues say the global data sets of forest change they have created contain information that can provide a "transparent, sound and consistent basis to quantify critical environmental issues," including the causes of the mapped changes in the amount of forest; the status of world's remaining intact natural forests; biodiversity threats from changes in ; the carbon stored or emitted as a result of gains or losses in tree cover in both managed and unmanaged forests; and the effects of efforts to halt or reduce forest loss.

For example, Hansen says, that while their study shows the efforts of Brazil's government to slow loss of rainforest have been effective, it also shows that a 2011 Indonesian government moratorium on new logging licenses was actually followed by significant increases in deforestation in 2011 and 2012.

"Brazil used Landsat data to document its deforestation trends, then used this information in its policy formulation and implementation. They also shared these data, allowing others to assess and confirm their success," Hansen says. "Such data have not been generically available for other parts of the world. Now, with our global mapping of changes every nation has access to this kind of information, for their own country and the rest of the world."

Explore further: Brazil sends more inspectors to Amazon rainforest

More information: High-resolution global maps 21st-century forest cover change, Science, Nov. 15, 2013, Vol 342, 6160.

Related Stories

Historic trends predict future global reforestation unlikely

October 9, 2013

Feeding a growing global population while also slowing or reversing global deforestation may only be possible if agricultural yields rise and/or per capita food consumption declines over the next century, according to historic ...

Parts of Amazon on the verge of forest-to-grassland shift

September 3, 2013

The stability of the Amazon rainforest, and the ecosystem's resilience to widespread deforestation, may be much lower than previously thought. The replacement of stands of trees with grassland changes evapotranspiration rates ...

Recommended for you

Study finds parrotfish are critical to coral reef health

January 23, 2017

An analysis of fossilized parrotfish teeth and sea urchin spines by researchers at Scripps Institution of Oceanography at the University of California San Diego showed that when there are more algae-eating fish on a reef, ...

Caves in central China show history of natural flood patterns

January 19, 2017

Researchers at the University of Minnesota have found that major flooding and large amounts of precipitation occur on 500-year cycles in central China. These findings shed light on the forecasting of future floods and improve ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1.4 / 5 (11) Nov 15, 2013
Pure propaganda. So-called "pollution" nowadays is just plant food:

"We suggest that the surge of fossil fuel use, mainly coal, since 2000 is a basic cause of the large increase of carbon uptake by the combined terrestrial and ocean carbon sinks. One mechanism by which fossil fuel emissions increase carbon uptake is by fertilizing the biosphere via provision of nutrients essential for tissue building, especially nitrogen, which plays a critical role in controlling net primary productivity and is limited in many ecosystems and field studies confirm a major role of nitrogen deposition, working in concert with CO2 fertilization, in causing a large increase in net primary productivity of temperate and boreal forests." - James Fucking Hansen, 2013
3 / 5 (2) Nov 15, 2013
Pure propaganda. So-called "pollution" nowadays is just plant food:

The article has nothing to do with climate change or CO2. It's a map of deforestation and changes in vegetation. It took me a minute to work out, but if you click on the images, it zooms into an area and shows measurements/snapshots.
2.3 / 5 (3) Nov 15, 2013
Sin: Just ignore Nik. If there is anything that can possibly be considered climate related, he has to start ranting about Gore, Hansen, or anyone else he can (not about the content of the article). It just shows how disconnected his rants are from the articles.
5 / 5 (1) Nov 15, 2013
Yeah I knew that Thermo, thanks. But I'm surprised he's ranting on articles now that have nothing or little to do with climate change. I'm also surprised that he's still here and hasn't been banned yet.
4 / 5 (4) Nov 16, 2013
@NikFromNYC says
Pure propaganda.
IS IT REALLY??? Lets look into the BS claim.

We suggest that the surge of fossil fuel use, mainly coal, since 2000 is a basic cause of the large increase of carbon uptake by the combined terrestrial and ocean carbon sinks.
The largest source of excess CO2 pollution is from coal and plants, forests, and oceans are the largest and only carbon sinks for 99% of all CO2. So is that propaganda or FACT?
One mechanism by which fossil fuel emissions increase carbon uptake is by fertilizing the biosphere
CO2 is part of the biology of the planet's respiration process. Animals breath in Oxygen and exhale CO2, where as plants absorb CO2 and exhale O2. So as CO2 from Coal/Gas/and Oil are pumped into the air, plant biology would naturally benefit for a short time. As CO2 builds up and the greenhouse effect takes over, then its another matter. With excess CO2, temperatures rise, and the survival of plants becomes questionable
3 / 5 (2) Nov 16, 2013
You know, by 2050, we could begin to see the begins of SOYLENT GREEN! Everything seems to be pointing to this kind of scenario, regardless of what the idiot deniers push in the way. It seems like the deniers what the earth to meet it's doom a lot faster than it will already.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.