Study helps quantify biodiversity decrease around farmland

September 11, 2013 by Robert H. Wells, University of Florida

Animal biodiversity suffers near conservation areas that border big farms, and the effects can spread for miles, according to a new study by University of Florida researchers and their colleagues.

Maintaining animal biodiversity is important as it can lead to greater control of and increased pollination around farmland as well as help maintain the health of an area's ecosystem, said Robert McCleery, a study co-author.

The researchers studied small mammal populations across large-scale sugarcane production areas and adjacent to isolated pockets of conservation land in Swaziland, Africa. The study was published Monday in the online journal PLOS ONE.

When analyzing small mammal populations 700 feet into the sugarcane, the researchers found that declined, leaving mainly generalist species that can thrive in a wide variety of conditions and are sometimes pests.

"It went from a diverse suite of eight or nine species to two generalist species that were very abundant," said McCleery, an assistant professor in UF's and conservation department, part of UF's Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences.

"You lost species, gained no species and had a huge biomass of pest species. And this goes on for miles and miles."

Here in the U.S., there are government programs to encourage to set aside agricultural land for conservation, McCleery said.

"From my perspective, the real problems are in the developing world where there is a rapid increase in , and there aren't government programs that consider ," he said.

McCleery said loss of cover, decreased diversity of food resources and agricultural practices, such as flooding the sugarcane, might have played a role in diminishing the populations of the specialist species they studied in Swaziland.

The researchers also measured small mammal populations as they extended from the sugarcane and into the conservation area.

"There weren't all that many negative impacts from the agriculture into the interior of the conservation area, and we saw that as a good thing," McCleery said.

The researcher said implementing different land uses into the landscape, such as perhaps cattle ranching, or incorporating natural habitat corridors connecting the conservation areas could be ways to reduce around the farmland and maintain species diversity.

"If we want to make our isolated protected areas viable, we need to encourage the flow of animals in between them," McCleery said. "We know that a continuous monoculture is not making that possible. So there need to be some different land uses and ways to connect them."

Explore further: Sea-level rise threatens endangered rabbit far more than development, research finds

Related Stories

Relating animals to humans could help conservation projects

August 22, 2013

New research by conservationists at the universities of Kent, Oxford, Columbia (USA) and Monash (Australia) suggests that people's tendency to relate more to animals that bear a resemblance to humans (anthropomorphism) could ...

Recommended for you


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.