Finnish study on climate change: Procrastination over mitigation measures could prove costly

September 4, 2013, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

Forecasts about global warming and its consequences are shrouded in uncertainty. Research scientists maintain that the risks associated with climate change are high, but are unable to estimate accurately how easily temperature reacts to changes in the levels of carbon dioxide. According to Tommi Ekholm, Research Scientist at VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, who has modelled the costs of climate change mitigation measures in his recent doctoral dissertation, it is because of this uncertainty that we need to accelerate measures to mitigate global warming rather than hold back.

According to Ekholm's calculations, curbing climate change to two degrees would require worldwide emissions trading and a price of approximately EUR 20 per one tonne of CO2 in 2020. Current systems are regional, and the price in the EU system, for example, has at times been as low as EUR 2-3 per tonne.

"By the end of the century, we should be looking at prices well in excess of EUR 100", Ekholm says.

Ekholm portrays the setting as a question of : Mitigation measures are likely to end up costing less if they are instigated straight away. If the sensitivity of climate change turns out to be lower than the consensus forecast, the intensity of measures can be pulled back. If, however, the sensitivity proves to be higher than anticipated, the cost of the then inevitable cuts to emissions may rise to intolerable levels in the short term.

"In the , the price of one tonne of CO2 could rise to levels as high as EUR 1,000. The probability of this scenario is in the region of a few per cent. The risk is not huge but not marginal either."

In his dissertation, Tommi Ekholm compared different ways to cut emissions globally in a cost-effective manner. He believes that the most cost-effective cuts can be made in electricity production, for example by substituting wind-powered electricity production for coal-powered electricity production.. The area with the second most potential for cost-effective cuts is the industrial sector, where emissions can be reduced by introducing new fuels and by increasing energy efficiency. In other sectors, such as transport and agriculture, the ways to cut emissions are still being developed. This is why the costs attributable to these sectors are considerably higher than those of or the industrial sector.

Tommi Ekholm's dissertation in systems and operations research, "Risks, costs and equity - Modelling efficient strategies for climate and energy policy", will be examined at Aalto University in Finland on 6 September 2013. Professor Erin Baker from the University of Massachusetts serves as the opponent and Professor Ahti Salo from Aalto University as the chair.

Explore further: Where is it cheapest to cut carbon?

Related Stories

Where is it cheapest to cut carbon?

August 30, 2012

Researchers from The Australian National University have shed some light on why some countries are more reluctant to agree to an international carbon price than others.

Cold climate wind energy showing huge potential

May 28, 2013

Wind energy capacity is growing rapidly in the cold climates of the world. According to the latest forecasts, between 45 and 50 gigawatts of wind energy will be built in cold climates by 2017, which would mean an increase ...

Researchers set out path for global warming reversal

July 10, 2013

Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) can reverse the global warming trend and push temperatures back below the global target of 2°C above pre-industrial levels, even if current policies fail and we initially ...

IEA: Energy emissions rose to record high in 2012

June 10, 2013

The world's energy-related carbon dioxide emissions rose 1.4 percent in 2012 to a record high of 31.6 billion tons, even though the U.S. posted its lowest emissions since the mid-1990s, the International Energy Agency said ...

Recommended for you

Mystery solved for mega-avalanches in Tibet

January 23, 2018

An international scientific effort determined the cause of a highly unusual and deadly glacier avalanche in Tibet in 2016, a new Nature Geoscience paper says.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3.3 / 5 (4) Sep 05, 2013
A question: Are China and India participating in the CO2 'cost sharing"? If not, then those who are are simply giving these countries another competitive advantage.
3.8 / 5 (4) Sep 05, 2013
And so, western countries which are attempting to limit carbon emissions might want ot consider a 'carbon tax' on products imported from non-participating countries.
3 / 5 (4) Sep 06, 2013
China out paced every other country in the production of renewable energy sources, PV etc. They see the need and desirability of lower CO2 levels. But why should they lead? Until the USA breaks away from Oil/Coal/Gas China will follow the USA's lead. It's that simple.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.