Changing climate poses threat to power plants, US report says

July 12, 2013 by Marina Villeneuve

Power plants across the country are at increased risk of temporary shutdown and reduced power generation as temperatures and sea levels continue to rise and water becomes less available, the Department of Energy said Thursday.

By 2030, there will be nearly $1 trillion in energy assets in the Gulf region alone at risk from increasingly costly extreme hurricanes and sea-level rises, according to the Energy Department report on the impact of climate change on .

"As President Obama said in his speech last month, climate change is happening," said spokeswoman April Saylor in a statement. "As climate change makes the weather more extreme, we have a to prepare the country for its effects."

The report calls on federal, state and local governments to more urgently prepare - particularly coal, natural gas and - for the compounded risks posed by floods, storms, wildfires and droughts.

"All of our science goes in one direction: the damages are going to get worse," said DOE assistant secretary Jonathan Pershing. "It will take dozens of actors from government and private sectors planning what to do and how to make it cost effective."

The report notes that have increased 1.5 degrees since 1900. More than 130 costing $1 billion or more in damage have occurred since 1980.

It says that 2012 was the second most expensive year for weather and climate disasters, with $115 billion in damage from Hurricane Sandy and extended drought.

Higher , costing consumers $45 billion, will require an additional 34 of new in the western United States by 2050. And as infrastructure ages, storm-related power outages are likely to become increasingly frequent, at an annual cost of $20 billion to $50 billion.

"More and more communities are analyzing vulnerabilities and their risks, and developing plans in response to those risks," said Brian Holland of the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives. Holland said more state and federal support is needed for communities, who also pursue private funding.

Greenpeace USA spokesman Robert Gardner said the administration's focus should primarily be transitioning to wind and solar technology, not relying on fossil fuels and nuclear energy.

"The question is why the Department of Energy is really focusing on continuing the problem which has caused this tidal wave of global warming," said Gardner.

Benjamin Cole of the American Energy Alliance, which lobbies for oil and natural gas, said that climate predictions should not be used to justify the "sweeping changes" of Obama's energy proposals, and that alternative energy has not yet lived up to promises.

"We can't continue to dole out money we don't have," for alternative energy, he said.

Explore further: Report: Use of coal to generate power rises

Related Stories

Report: Use of coal to generate power rises

July 12, 2013

Power plants in the United States are burning coal more often to generate electricity, reversing the growing use of natural gas and threatening to increase domestic emissions of greenhouse gases after a period of decline, ...

Most coal must stay in ground to save climate

June 17, 2013

Most fossil fuels must remain in the ground because burning them will unleash changes that will "challenge the existence of our society", a new Australian government agency report warned Monday.

Renewable energy use gaining worldwide: IEA

June 26, 2013

Renewables like solar and wind represent the fastest-growing source of energy power generation and will make up a quarter of the global power mix by 2018, the International Energy Agency said in a report Wednesday.

Germany must spread cost of energy shift fairly: IEA

May 24, 2013

The International Energy Agency said Friday that Germany must shield its consumers from paying too much of the cost of its ambitious switch from nuclear power and fossil fuels toward renewable energy.

Recommended for you

Researchers engineer a tougher fiber

February 22, 2019

North Carolina State University researchers have developed a fiber that combines the elasticity of rubber with the strength of a metal, resulting in a tougher material that could be incorporated into soft robotics, packaging ...

A quantum magnet with a topological twist

February 22, 2019

Taking their name from an intricate Japanese basket pattern, kagome magnets are thought to have electronic properties that could be valuable for future quantum devices and applications. Theories predict that some electrons ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2 / 5 (16) Jul 12, 2013
More scare tactics from those who must keep the dollars flowing in their direction or starve.

For example: "The question is why the Department of Energy is really focusing on continuing the problem which has caused this tidal wave of global warming," said Gardner.

WHat tidal wave of global warming? Yes the earth has warmed less than 1 deg C/century for over a century as it warmed from the little ice age, and that warming has not accelerated. In fact, the evidence, and the apparent travesty, is no warming for at least 15 years. All this while the CO2 concentration has increased from 0.028% to 0.040%, and the all models and modelers continue to forecast doom and gloom.

There is no evidence of accelerating global sea level rise over the past century. The evidence also tells us that cyclonic storm energy is down, globally. The world, and especially the deserts, are greening w/ the extra CO2 fertilization.

Things are no where near as bad as these doomsters wish.
2.5 / 5 (13) Jul 12, 2013
Ouch ! where did you get your facts ?
1.8 / 5 (16) Jul 12, 2013
more greenie BS
1.3 / 5 (12) Jul 12, 2013
The damage and cost from these AGW Alamists lies will make that from all natural weather events, pale in comparison. Well, at least, their False Prophet Gore will be the first CO2 billionaire.
1.5 / 5 (11) Jul 13, 2013
Greenpeace may want more wind and solar and that's not a bad idea, but they are both prone to storm damage. They may be nice but most renewable power plants aren't real tough. High winds, hail, too much rain damages both. Tidal buoy power might be effective, if anchored strong enough and deep enough, if we can ever get it deployed.

The responsible answer is to redesign more "hardened" natural gas fired plants that incorporate more weather resistant designs and buried utilities.
1 / 5 (8) Jul 15, 2013
Ouch ! where did you get your facts ?

From his nether regions, as usual.

That's from whence you came, so you should know.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.