Broken tooth in dino tail 'proves' T. rex was predator

July 15, 2013 by Kerry Sheridan
A visitor looks at a the skull of a Tyrannosaurus rex at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles on July 7, 2011. A broken T. rex tooth found in another dinosaur's tail bone offers the first hard evidence that the king of all meat-eating beasts hunted live prey, US paleontologists said Monday.

A broken T. rex tooth found in another dinosaur's tail bone offers the first hard evidence that the king of all meat-eating beasts hunted live prey, US paleontologists said Monday.

Scientists have long debated whether the fossil record really proves the legendary Tyrannosaurus rex was a ferocious hunter or just a scavenger that feasted on carcasses of the dead.

Previous discoveries of in the bellies of T. rex fossils, and even T. rex-shaped bites out of the tails of other dinosaurs, have strongly suggested that the late Cretaceous (66-100 million years ago) beast was a predator.

But paleontologists have not been able to rule out that T. rex was an opportunistic scavenger, and scientists say the latest research still cannot disprove that theory.

What researchers have described in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, a US journal, is the first discovery of a broken T. rex tooth in another dinosaur bone—in this case, in the of a plant-eating hadrosaur.

"What we can tell from this without a shadow of a doubt is that a T. rex engaged a living hadrosaur," said lead author Robert dePalma, of the Palm Beach Museum of Natural History in Florida.

"What this present specimen does is it helps to essentially recrown the king," he told AFP.

The bones were uncovered in 2007 in the Hell Creek Formation, a prominent field that spans parts of Montana and North and South Dakota.

Poking out of two fused vertebrae is a major chunk of a T. rex tooth—a well-preserved crown 3.75 centimeters (1.5 inches) long.

T. rex teeth were as big as bananas, and they could regrow any lost during their lifetimes, much like sharks do today, de Palma said.

Tyrannosaurus rex tooth crown embedded between hadrosaur vertebrae and surrounded by bone overgrowth. Researchers Robert A. DePalma II on left and David A. Burnham on right. Credit: David A. Burnham.

The hadrosaur's bone regrew over the injury, signifying that the creature escaped and healed, maybe even living for years afterward.

"The rarity of this piece is so extreme," said dePalma, who worked with co-authors at the University of Kansas and the Black Hills Institute of Geological Research in South Dakota.

"We never in a million years expected to find something that was this clear in the ," he added.

But researchers said their analysis does not mean the reputed dino bully ate only living beasts—it likely ate dead remains, too.

"Like most modern large predators, it almost certainly did also scavenge carcasses," said the study.

Some experts have argued that the lumbering T. rex—as tall as a two story house—could not run fast enough to be a skillful predator.

Jack Horner, curator of paleontology at the Museum of the Rockies in Bozeman, Montana, has described the T. rex as less like a lion and more like a hyena—a creature that fed on creatures large and small, both carrion and fresh-killed prey.

A survey of dinosaur remains in the Hell Creek Formation by Horner and colleagues in 2011 showed that there were a high number of T. rex bones compared to other large dinosaurs, suggesting the T. rex must have had a range of food options to keep its population thriving.

Horner has also advanced the theory that T. rex's short arms, big body and apparently strong sense of smell made it suited for sniffing out the dead.

Asked for comment on the latest research, Horner told AFP in an email it was "insignificant."

"It certainly does not refute our idea that T. rex was an opportunistic carnivore like a hyena. It simply shows that a tyrannosaur bit a hadrosaur," he said.

"It does not reveal any evidence concerning the circumstance."

Other evidence has been found of a T. rex apparently chomping on another dinosaur's tail, but those fossils lacked the tooth left behind and contained only a bite mark.

Ken Carpenter, a paleontologist at Utah State University who has uncovered one such T. rex bite mark, said the latest research backs up the bad-boy legend, but also renders a softer image of the T. rex as a fallible hunter, just like modern animals.

"When you have specimens that show regrowth of bone around an injury that can only be attributed to a T. rex, as in the case of the new article, then it is pretty conclusive that T. rex was indeed a predator," Carpenter told AFP.

"That we have evidence of failed kills, unsuccessful kills is kind of neat. It shows that T. rex was just as unsuccessful as predators today," he added.

"Let's face it. Everybody would think it was pretty bogus if something as cool as T. rex could only eat dead things."

Explore further: What did T. rex eat? Each other

More information: Physical evidence of predatory behavior in Tyrannosaurus rex, PNAS,

Related Stories

What did T. rex eat? Each other

October 15, 2010

It turns out that the undisputed king of the dinosaurs, Tyrannosaurus rex, didn't just eat other dinosaurs but also each other. Paleontologists from the United States and Canada have found bite marks on the giants' bones ...

T. Rex's killer smile revealed

February 28, 2012

One of the most prominent features of life-size, museum models of Tyrannosaurus rex, is its fearsome array of flesh-ripping, bone-crushing teeth.

T. rex more hyena than lion

February 22, 2011

The ferocious Tyrannosaurus rex has been depicted as the top dog of the Cretaceous, ruthlessly stalking herds of duck-billed dinosaurs and claiming the role of apex predator, much as the lion reigns supreme in the African ...

Recommended for you

EPA adviser is promoting harmful ideas, scientists say

March 22, 2019

The Trump administration's reliance on industry-funded environmental specialists is again coming under fire, this time by researchers who say that Louis Anthony "Tony" Cox Jr., who leads a key Environmental Protection Agency ...

Coffee-based colloids for direct solar absorption

March 22, 2019

Solar energy is one of the most promising resources to help reduce fossil fuel consumption and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions to power a sustainable future. Devices presently in use to convert solar energy into thermal ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

4.7 / 5 (3) Jul 16, 2013
That one find may be evidence but that's a bit short of proof. That's not to say they don't look like one hell of a predator. I wouldn't want to have one in my backyard, even with a good fence.
3 / 5 (2) Jul 16, 2013
Carnivorous reptiles often prefer live prey. Pit vipers, for example, won't touch a corpse. They generally will consider anything small enough to kill to be edible, any anything large enough to kill them to be a threat. Anything the same size as they, but from a different carnivorous species, is competition.
However, if a large food source should happen to be found lying about passively dead, most reptiles will not pass it up.
In short, T. rex was an obligate carnivore and large enough to eat almost anything it wanted to, alive or dead.
4 / 5 (2) Jul 16, 2013
I'd think the fact that the TRex is a predator was a no-brainer? I mean it's cool that they have the first "hard evidence" that the Trex is a predator, but I mean the thing is really fucking huge and has giant friggen teeth. There's not many dinosaurs that can really challenge that.. he'd just step on them if they tried.
1.1 / 5 (7) Jul 17, 2013
The conclusion would be laughed out of any courtroom in the world today!

Now, if they found the hadrosaur's bones inside the T-Rex stomach, then they have REAL evidence. But as usual all they have is conjecture based on the thinnest evidence imaginable!

Those Giant teeth were used for stripping leaves and fruit from trees as all animals were vegetarians in the predeluvian world.

Good call MandoZink!
1 / 5 (4) Jul 18, 2013
If T. Rex wasn't a predator, then large herbivores like Triceratops would have needed no need to defend themselves with those massive horns. It certainly had the ability to kill. That would be like saying that crocodiles are scavengers because they don't have the ability to chase down prey. Ask Jack Horner what the reason behind his theory is, as he has claimed in at least one interview that he doesn't "like T-rex".
5 / 5 (4) Jul 18, 2013
The conclusion would be laughed out of any courtroom in the world today!
Just like the Creationists were laughed out of the Dover courtroom? Fortunately science isn't normally adjudicated in the courtroom.
Those Giant teeth were used for stripping leaves and fruit from trees as all animals were vegetarians in the predeluvian world.
Really? So those puncture wounds we see in fossil skulls were just accidental? I suppose next you'll tell us that those massive canines on saber-toothed tigers were just for digging the meat out of Brazil nuts. I think you really just don't want to have to explain what all those carnivores ate on the Ark.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.