Bands urge fans to put the phone down

June 26, 2013 by James Pheby

There are few experiences which compare to the life-affirming thrill of a live music event, knowing that you are one of a privileged few being treated to a display of raw artistic skill and power.

But just as the atmosphere reaches fever pitch, a sea of illuminated smartphones obscures the view and shatters the intimacy, reducing your memories to a shaky YouTube clip drowned out by off-key gig-goers.

Artists and fans are now speaking out against the rising trend of filming concerts on phones.

"People who would rather record a gig than actually look with their own eyes" are challenging the "very essence of the 'live experience'", said Glenn Max, a producer who has worked with Massive Attack, John Cale and Patti Smith.

"It is clear to artists that audiences are moving away from experiencing the music directly, preferring to feel it through their phone."

Tim Burgess, who in April released memoirs detailing his 20 years as lead singer of indie band The Charlatans, urged music fans to use the "recording device in our brains", which "have far better effects than you can get on a phone".

Footage "filmed from half a mile away with the 'director's' mates singing at the top of their voice" cannot capture the emotion of a gig, he told AFP.

Max, artistic director of London's Village Underground cultural project, added that as well as affecting the crowd's enjoyment, those on stage were also bothered.

"It affects the artist's experience tremendously and on many levels," he said.

"Artists work hard and very carefully to be represented as they conceive their own work. Imagine singing your heart out to an audience that's stripping you of this dignity."

Iconic British indie performers Ian Brown and Jarvis Cocker have also spoken out about the craze, but it is not confined to the world of popular music.

Polish pianist Krystian Zimerman recently stormed off stage at the Ruhr Piano Festival in Germany after spotting an audience member filming his performance.

"The destruction of music because of YouTube is enormous," Zimerman said on returning to the stage.

Up to the music industry to act

But should anything be done to limit the trend?

After all, thanks to online amateur footage, fans in countries not served by the travelling live music circus now have a chance to sample the concert experience.

Russia and India were recently highlighted by the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) as huge potential markets for this.

Singer Burgess also points out the benefits to those who cannot afford tickets and "kids who maybe aren't able to get to a gig" due to age restrictions.

But many artists remain opposed.

US art-rockers Yeah Yeah Yeahs took matters into their own hands, posting notes on the doors of New York's Webster Hall asking fans not to film "as a courtesy to the person behind you and to Nick, Karen and Brian (the band)".

The power to enforce a ban ultimately rests with the battered music industry, which has already seen technology decimate its revenues from record sales.

Record companies own exclusive rights to record their artists' music, meaning promoters have to do "what they can" to prevent unauthorised filming, explained Chris Cooke, legal expert and co-founder of online news provider Complete Music Update.

Although not "specifically illegal", promoters could sue transgressors for breach of contract if filming is forbidden by the ticket's terms, he said.

Apple meanwhile mooted plans in 2011 to block its smartphones from recording at concerts, but such moves risk creating a consumer backlash.

For all those who fear amateur recordings could lead to live DVD sales going the same way as record revenues, there are others who sense an opportunity.

Most attempts to create subscription-based or ad-funded live music websites have failed, but many are still hopeful of developing a profitable model "and that may contribute to resistance in the business regards phone-based gig recordings", said Cooke.

Some labels are "dabbling with the idea" of creating websites which would combine crowd-sourced footage with "a decent capture of the sound from the sound desk", he added.

However, phone-wielding directors appear to pose little threat to the industry's revenues, which have risen globally every year since 2006, hitting $23.5 billion in 2011, according to

As Jem Finer of punk band The Pogues told AFP: "You can't experience a live show without being at a live show."

Explore further: Musicians find fame and fortune at YouTube

Related Stories

Flat year for US music industry, survey says

March 27, 2013

US music industry sales held nearly steady in 2012 as gains from digital subscription services offset further declines in physical disc sales, an industry survey showed Wednesday.

When it comes to music, Sweden goes up stream

March 10, 2013

Despite being home to a vibrant community of file-sharing activists, Sweden is at the forefront of a global recovery in music sales driven by streaming music services such as Spotify, industry observers say.

YouTube buys US-based music rights company

December 9, 2011

YouTube said Friday it has acquired RightsFlow, a New York-based company which manages music rights for songwriters, recording artists, record labels and online music services.

Recommended for you

A not-quite-random walk demystifies the algorithm

December 15, 2017

The algorithm is having a cultural moment. Originally a math and computer science term, algorithms are now used to account for everything from military drone strikes and financial market forecasts to Google search results.

US faces moment of truth on 'net neutrality'

December 14, 2017

The acrimonious battle over "net neutrality" in America comes to a head Thursday with a US agency set to vote to roll back rules enacted two years earlier aimed at preventing a "two-speed" internet.

FCC votes along party lines to end 'net neutrality' (Update)

December 14, 2017

The Federal Communications Commission repealed the Obama-era "net neutrality" rules Thursday, giving internet service providers like Verizon, Comcast and AT&T a free hand to slow or block websites and apps as they see fit ...

The wet road to fast and stable batteries

December 14, 2017

An international team of scientists—including several researchers from the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Argonne National Laboratory—has discovered an anode battery material with superfast charging and stable operation ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Jun 26, 2013
Would the people who record videos on their phones otherwise have purchased something? Or the people who watch those crappy videos? No? Then no profit was lost. Conversely, does the existence of those videos increase the band's popularity? Presumably increasing their revenues?
The power to enforce a ban ultimately rests with the battered music industry, which has already seen technology decimate its revenues from record sales.

I suspect this is a little misleading. Doesn't the music industry derive profits from other than record sales nowadays? Like MP3s?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.